RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of bioflocs on immune responses of Fleshy shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis postlarvae and adults as related to the different feeding abilities

Su-Kyoung Kim1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-032X, Su Kyoung Kim1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6647-6798, In-Kwon Jang1, Je-Cheon Jun1
Author Information & Copyright
1National Institute of Fisheries Science, Taean 32132, Korea
*Corresponding author: Su-Kyoung Kim, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Taean 32132, Korea, Tel: +82-41-675-3781, E-mail:agemang@korea.kr

Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 04, 2023; Revised: Oct 11, 2023; Accepted: Oct 17, 2023

Published Online: Nov 30, 2023

Abstract

The present study compared the structure of mixilliped of Fenneropenaeus chinensis between the larval and adult stage and investigated the effect of the structural difference on the immunity of F. chinensis. A fourteen day and a one-month long culture trial were conducted each with postlarvae and adults of F. chinensis in the biofloc, mixed water (50% biofloc:50% clear seawater) and seawater control. Immune-related genes mRNA expressions of postlarvae was analysed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). And the analysis of adult stage immunity was carried out using phenoloxidase (PO) enzyme activation in haemocyte. In the postlarvae, the final body weights were 51.43 and 58.47 mg for the biofloc water and the control seawater, respectively. On the other hand, the final body weights of the adults were significantly different between biofloc water and seawater. The survival rate showed the opposite trend to the growth rate. Immune related genes mRNA expression levels in the postlarvae in the biofloc water were significantly lower than those in the seawater. While, the adult stage showed significantly higher PO enzyme activations in the biofloc water than in the seawater with the PO enzyme activation increasing proportionally to the biofloc concentration. This result is considerably explained by the observations of setal morphological structures of the third maxilliped: postlarvae have short serrulated setae that compose the small ‘net’ structure while adults had long and dense plumose setae. It is understood that the morphological difference of the maxilliped structure resulted in the different feeding abilities in the postlarvae and the adult F. chinensis to use bioflocs as food source.

Keywords: Biofloc; Fenneropenaeus chinensis; Immune; Third maxilliped; Development stages

Introduction

In South Korea, two native penaeid species (Fenneropenaeus chinensis and Marsupenaeus japonicus) and an introduced species (Litopenaeus vannamei) are currently cultured, and the majority of farmed production is derived from L. vannamei (Jang et al., 2007, 2009). Shrimp is one of the most economically important aquaculture species in Korea and worldwide; however, many shrimp farms in South Korea have been significantly affected by various pathogens, including white spot syndrome virus (WSSV; Jang et al., 2011a ; Meng et al., 2010). In 2006, 32.9% of the 468 shrimp farms in South Korea had been hit by the WSSV outbreak, although production has recovered since then (Jang et al., 2009). Our previous study demonstrated the positive effects of bioflocs on the growth and immunity of L. vannamei (Kim et al., 2014). Enhancing disease-resistance by improving shrimp immune activity is considered an effective strategy to control diseases in shrimp species including F. chinensis (Huang et al., 2006). The present study investigated some selective immune related genes including: prophenoloxidase1 (proPO1), prophenoloxidase activating enzyme (PPAE), serin proteinase1 (SP1), masquerade-like serine proteinase (Mas), and ras-related nuclear protein (Ran) mRNA expression. Innate immune reactions are the first line of defense against pathogens in vertebrates and invertebrates (Loker et al., 2004). It is initiated by the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns in invading organisms but not in hosts (Janeway & Medzhitov, 2002), which is followed by triggering cellular and humoral responses in hosts (Medzhitov & Janeway, 2000). In invertebrates, cellular responses consist of encapsulation, phagocytosis, and nodule formation while humoral responses include clotting, synthesis of antimicrobial peptides, and activation of the prophenoloxidase (proPO) system (Lee et al., 2004). The proPO activation system plays an important role in defense against pathogens and parasites and during cuticular sclerotization. Activation of the proPO system is triggered by elicitors derived from microbial cell walls, such as lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, and β-1, 3-gulcan (Loker et al., 2004; Medzhitov & Janeway, 2000). Prophenoloxidase activating protein, also referred to as PPAE, is the last protease of the serine protease (SPs) cascade that converts proPO to PO in Manduca sexta (Jiang et al., 2003). SPs constitute one of the largest families of enzymes in the animal kingdom (Shi et al., 2008). SPs engage in many physiological processes via proteolytic cleavage of specific proteins (Rawlings & Alan, 1994). They are generally secreted at extracellular, vesicular, or granular locations, and have extracellular functions (Gorman & Paskewitz, 2001). Several SPs have been cloned from various shrimp: including binding protein of the yellow head virus from Penaeus monodon (Sriphaijit et al., 2007) and pseudo-clip domain containing SPs from L. vannamei hemocytes (Jiménez-Vega et al., 2005). Masquerade-like proteins is one of the SPs, and this protein has been shown to function in granulocyte adhesion, pattern recognition, and opsonization (Huang et al., 2000; Lee & Söderhäll, 2001). To Ran may play roles in L. vannamei immunity against both virial and bacterial infection (Zhang et al., 2019).

Kent et al. (2011) found that in the culture trial of L. vannamei juveniles provided with different sizes of microalgae, the cell size appeared to be a key factor in the feed consumption by the animals. Also, Kim et al. (2015, 2021) reported that the different contributions of biofloc are closely related to the morphological features of the setae on the third maxilliped of each species. Observations of the maxillipeds of the post larvae of L. vannamei, F. chinensis, and M. japonicus revealed that the types and structures of setal affected the biofloc feeding efficiencies of these shrimp species. In particular, F. chinensis and M. japonicus showed a lower response to bioflocs than L. vannamei. The third maxilliped is mouthparts and consists of a large five segmented endopod, a long exopod and an epipod, armed with various types of setae (Alexander & Hindley, 1985; Suthers, 1984). Information generated through studies on the functional morphology of mouthparts and gut could assist in identifying appropriate characteristics of prey or in developing effective formula diets that better meet the nutritional requirements for each life stage of important aquaculture organisms. This approach has been used successfully for various crustaceans, such as, slipper lobsters, spiny lobsters, blue crabs and prawns (Alexander & Hindley, 1985; Cox et al., 2008; Johnston & Alexander, 1999; McConaugha, 2002). The present study investigated the effects of biofloc on the growth, survival rate and immune response of F. chinensis postlarvae and adults and their biofloc feeding efficiencies, as related to the morphological structure of the third maxilliped.

Materials and Methods

Animals

A total of 10,000 F. chinensis postlarvae (mean body length 18.3 ± 2.86 mm, mean body weight 29.4 ± 13.53 mg) purchased from a local shrimp hatchery. Animals were acclimated in 1,000 L aquaria of sand filtered, ozone treated and heated to 25°C until start of the study. A total of 400 postlarvae were stocked in 20 L plastic bins. We produced F. chinensis adult (mean body length 106.5 ± 5.77 mm, mean body weight 15.2 ± 3.05 g) form outdoor pond. We were stocked in 200 L tanks of 20 individuals. All experiments were performed with tree replicates in each tank with one air stone each to provide aeration.

Experimental design

The study was conducted at room temperature of 27°C at the West Sea Fisheries Research Institute (WSFRI), National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS) Taean, South Korea. 20 L and 200 L rearing tanks were used for each of the three treatments (mean of total suspended solids [TSS] concentrations): biofloc (480 mg/L); mixed (50% BF:50% seawater, 200 mg/L); and seawater (10 mg/L). The rearing tank of each water treatment received recirculated water from the corresponding reservoir at a rate of 50%. Each tank was provided with an air stone at the center of the bottom to keep particles gently suspended and to maintain dissolved oxygen (DO) above 5 mg/L. Seawater for the control biofloc free treatment was sterilized using ozone. The biofloc water source was provided daily from a greenhouse-enclosed intensive shrimp production raceway tank (14-m width × 22-m length × 1.2-m depth) with zero exchange at the experimental station. The mixed water was 50% of seawater and 50% of biofloc water. During the experiments, L. vannamei of approximately 5–10 g were grown with a stocking density of 400–450 shrimp/m2 in the greenhouse raceway tank. Postlarvae were provided with a larval diet (45% crude protein, CJ Feed & Care, Seoul, Korea) and adults were provided with a formulated shrimp feed (40% crude protein, CJ Feed & Care) at three equal daily portions (9:00 a.m., 5:00 p.m., 10:00 p.m.). Water temperature, salinity, pH and DO were measured daily using an YSI 85 meter (YSI, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Alkalinity, total ammonia-nitrogen (TA-N), nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) and total bacterial counts were measured every three days in reservoir tanks (Kim et al., 2014).

Total bacterial counts

The number of total bacteria was determined by 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) staining method (Hobbie et al., 1977). Bacterial numbers were calculated as described by Kirchman et al. (1982).

Growth performance and survival rate

After 14 days, final mean body weights were measured to the nearest 0.1 mg using a scale (BP221S, Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany) and survival rates were calculated at the end of the experiment for each tank.

Expression of immune-related genes analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) (for postlarvae)

The names and GenBank accession numbers of the target genes are shown Table 1. At the end of the experiment, three animals were selected from each treatment to be placed in liquid nitrogen and then stored at –80°C until use for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini Kit and then purified with DNase I (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). A TaqMan quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) technique was used to measure mRNA expression of the six immune-related genes. mRNA expression were measured according to the method of Kim et al. (2014). The relative expression was determined by the comparative threshold cycle method (2-ΔΔCT method, Livak & Schmittgen, 2001).

Table 1. Immune related genes primers and probes sequences
Name Primer sequence (5’ → 3’) Accession no. & remarks
proPO1-RT- F CGAGGGTGGAGAAGCTAGACA JX644447, present study
proPO1-RT- R CCGGAGTTGCTGATAGTCAGTTT JX644447, present study
proPO1-RT- P TGGCGCATTCCCATCAAGGACG JX644447, present study
PPAE-RT- F GGTGACGGTGCCCATCTG JX644446, present study
PPAE-RT- R CGCACAGCTGCTTGTCGAT JX644446, present study
PPAE-RT- P CTTGCGACGACGCCTACGAACAGAA JX644446, present study
SP1- RT- F TCAGGTGGCCCCTTGGT JX644456, Kim et al., 2014
SP1-RT- R CAGGACCGTAGGAGACAATGC JX644456, Kim et al., 2014
SP1-RT- P CTTGCCGGCACTTTTGGTCCTCC JX644456, Kim et al., 2014
Mas-RT- F TGGGATTGCTCCGCACA JX644444, present study
Mas-RT- R ATTTCCGCCCCTGGAAGAT JX644444, present study
Mas-RT- P CCCCGTCTGCTTGCCTTCTCAGG JX644444, present study
Ran-RT- F CCAAGAGAAATTGGGAGGTCTTC JX644455, Kim et al., 2014
Ran-RT- R GGGAACATTCTTGTACGTGACTCTAG JX644455, Kim et al., 2014
Ran-RT- P ATGGTTACTACATCCAGGCCCACTGTGC JX644455, Kim et al., 2014
β-actin-RT- F CCGAGCGTGGCTACACCTT Present study
β-actin-RT- R GCACAGCTTCTCCTTGATGTCA Present study
β-actin-RT- P CCACCGCCGAGCGAGAAATCG Present study

proPO, prophenoloxidase1; PPAE, prophenoloxidase activating enzyme; SP1, serin proteinase1; Mas, masquerade-like serine proteinase; Ran, ras-related nuclear protein.

Download Excel Table
Phenoloxidase (PO) enzyme activity assay (for adult)

A hemolymph (0.5 mL) was individually withdrawn from the pericardial cavity of each shrimp into a 3 mL sterile syringe containing 1 mL of anticoagulant solution (Bae et al., 2012). Haemolymphs collected from each of the three samples were pooled in a tube, and then centrifuged. The haemocyte pellet was used for the PO enzyme activity assay. PO activity of hemolymph was determined using the following Jang et al. (2011b) method: The diluted haemolymph was homogenized and hemocyte lysate supernatant (HLS) was collected after centrifuge for 20 min. For a PO measurement, 50 µL of HLS was placed in 96 well micro-plates and incubated for 10min with 50 µL of trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 25°C. Then 50 µL of L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalaine (L-dopa; Sigma-Aldrich) was added. After 10 min, a 50 µL homogenized buffer (HB, 10 mM sodium cacodylate, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 7.0) was added, and the PO activity was measured using a microplate reader (PowerWaveXS, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 490 nm.

Observation and measure of the third maxillipeds

All specimens examined in this study were either in the postlarvae or the adult stage. Five individuals of each stage were fixed and examined followed that of Kim et al. (2015). Total endopod length, seta length, seta distance, setule length, setule distance and filtering areas of the third maxilliped endopods were measure and calculated using an equation suggested by Kim et al. (2015). The definition and classification of setal characteristics was generally followed that of Garm (2004a, 2004b).

Data analysis

The results were expressed as the mean ± SD. Significant differences between more than three groups were determined by Stepwise Newman-Keuls test following one-way analysis of variance and results of two parameters results were analyzed using t-tests with 95% confidence level in SPSS 13.0 software.

Results

Water quality parameters of each treatment reservoir

The water quality parameters in tanks are showed in Table 2. Water temperature was maintained at 28.8°C, DO in a range from 5.5 to 5.7 mg/L and alkalinity, each parameter showing no significant difference between the treatments. On the other hand, other factors including salinity (29.9, 31.7 psu), pH (7.8, 8.4) and inorganic nitrogen (TA-N, NO2-N, NO3-N) concentrations were significantly different among the treatments. In particular, turbidity was 24 times higher in the biofloc water (7 vs. 169.5 mg/L seawater and biofloc, respectively), showing a larger difference between the treatments.

Table 2. Water quality parameters of each treatment reservoir throughout the experiment (mean ± SD, p < 0.05)
Parameter Seawater Mixed water Biofloc water
WT (°C) 28.8 ± 0.6 28.7 ± 0.9 28.8 ± 1.0
Salinity (psu) 31.7 ± 0.1a 31.4 ± 1.0a 29.9 ± 0.4b
pH 8.7 ± 0.1a 8.3 ± 0.1a 7.8 ± 0.1b
DO (mg/L) 5.7 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 0.3 5.5 ± 0.3
TA-N (mg/L) 0.02 ± 0.02a 0.43 ± 0.05b 0.50 ± 0.08c
NO2-N (mg/L) 0.00 ± 0.00a 1.44 ± 0.09b 3.32 ± 3.42c
NO3-N (mg/L) 0.09 ± 0.06a 65.39 ± 4.30b 263.4 ± 13.99c
Alkalinity 144 ± 20.92 144.5 ± 17.7 145 ± 14.5
TSS (mg/L) 15.7 ± 4.12a 118.3 ± 87.9b 486.6 ± 137.1c
VSS (mg/L) 7.3 ± 2.37a 98.8 ± 16.8b 377.6 ± 44.1c

a–c Different letters indicate a significant difference between clear seawater, mixed and biofloc treatments.

WT, water temperature; DO, dissolved oxygen; TA-N, total ammonia-nitrogen; NO2-N, nitrite-nitrogen; NO3-N, nitrate-nitrogen; TSS, total suspended solids; VSS, volatile suspended solids.

Download Excel Table
Total bacterial counts

Table 3 shows the total bacterial counts for each treatment and stage. The total number of bacteria in the biofloc water was significantly higher than that in the seawater (Table 3). Also, the seawater and mixed water were significant different between each treatment and stage. But, the biofloc water showed the total bacterial counts ranging from 5.59 × 106 to 1.28 × 107 cells /mL and from 6.79 × 106 to 1.72 × 107 cells/mL for postlarvae and adult, respectively. There was no significant different between the two stages.

Table 3. Total bacterial counts in each of the treatment reservoirs (mean ± SD, p < 0.05)
Stage Seawater Mixed water Biofloc water
Postlarvae Mean ± SD (cell/mL) 9.62 × 104a 9.53 × 105b 2.30 × 106b
Range (cell/mL) 3.42 × 104 –4.78 × 105 6.19 × 105–1.57 × 105 5.59 × 106–1.28 × 107
Adult Mean ± SD (cell/mL) 2.21 × 104a* 7.71 × 106b* 1.22 × 107b
Range (cell/mL) 3.42–5.43 × 104 6.11–9.38 × 106 6.79 × 106–1.72 × 107

a,b The significant difference between clear seawater, mixed and biofloc treatments for each stage is marked with different letters (p < 0.05).

* A significant difference between the same treatments of the two different stages is marked with an asterisk.

Download Excel Table
Growth and survival rates

Table 4 summarizes the mean final body weight and survival rate of the shrimp for each treatment on the day of the study termination. The final body weight of postlarvae were 51.4 and 58.5 mg for the biofloc water and seawater, respectively, with no significant difference between the two treatments. But the mixed water resulted in the final postlarvae body weight of 90.5 mg, which was significantly higher than those of the other two treatments. And the adults showed similar trends to postlarvae, with the mixed water resulting in the final body weight of 15 g, which was significantly higher than those of the other treatments. Survival rate of postlarvae had no significant difference between the biofloc water and mixed water (32%–36%) but there was significant difference between the biofloc water and the seawater (52%). On the other hand, the survival rate of the adults was not significantly different between all the three treatments.

Table 4. Shrimp final body weight and survival rate (mean ± SD, p < 0.05)
Stage Parameters Seawater Mixed water Biofloc water
Postlarvae Final body weight (mg) 58.5 ± 33.6a 90.5 ± 60.1b 51.4 ± 30.3a
Survival rate (%) 52 ± 0.1a 36 ± 0.0b 32 ± 0.0b
Total production (g) 12.17a 13.03a 6.58b
Adult Final body weight (g) 12.6 ± 1.1a 15.0 ± 0.9b 14.3 ± 0.5ab
Survival rate (%) 75 ± 0.0a 81.7 ± 0.5a 82.5 ± 2.1a
Total production (g) 472.5a 612.8b 589.9b

a,b The significant difference between clear seawater, mixed and biofloc treatments for each stage is marked with different letters (p < 0.05).

Download Excel Table
Immune-related genes expression (for postlarvae)

Results of relative mRNA expression in the five immune-related genes are summarized in Fig. 1. The PPAE, SP1, and Mas genes of the biofloc and the mixed water treatment showed significantly lower levels of expression than those of the seawater. But, in the biofloc and the mixed water, the proPO gene expression was significantly higher than that in the seawater.

fas-26-11-649-g1
Fig. 1. PPAE, proPO, SP1, Mas and Ran mRNA from Fnneropenaeus chinensis postlarvae in seawater, mixed and biofloc water. The transcription levels were detected by TaqMan qRT-PCR. Gene expression level was normalized to β-actin (± SD, n = 9, p < 0.05). PPAE, prophenoloxidase activating enzyme; SP1, serin proteinase1; proPO, prophenoloxidase1; Mas, masquerade-like serine proteinase; Ran, ras-related nuclear protein; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
Download Original Figure
Phenoloxidase (PO) activity (for adult)

PO activity was measured in haemocyte of F. chinensis adult. PO activities linearly increased with a higher biofloc concentration. In the biofloc water, PO activity was significantly higher than that of the seawater (Fig. 2).

fas-26-11-649-g2
Fig. 2. PO activity (dopachrome formation/min/mg protein) measured in haemocyte of Fenneropenaeus chinensis adult in seawater, mixed and biofloc water (± SD, n = 9, p < 0.05). PO, phenoloxidase.
Download Original Figure
Third maxilliped structures of postlarvae and adult

Table 5 summerizes the mean body, total third maxilliped length, seta length, seutla length and distance of the stages. They were sinificantly different between the postlarvae and adult. The seta distance was found to have no significant difference between the stages. The filter area of adult was significantly larger than that of postlarvae. The microscopic drawings and setal description of the endopod segments of the third maxilliped, hereinafter called ‘maxilliped’, in the two stages are provided in Fig. 3 and Table 6, respectively.

Table 5. Body length of animals, endpod length, setal parameters and filter area on the maxilliped in the postlarvae and adults (± SD, p < 0.05)
Parameters Postlarvae Adults
Body length (mm) 22.07 ± 3.31a 145.9 ± 4.47b
Total endopod length (mm) 0.84 ± 0.22a 81.67 ± 2.68b
Seta length (µm) 79.0 ± 19.7a 416.0 ± 53.7b
Seta distance (µm) 29.1 ± 4.7a 24.4 ± 2.0a
Setule length (µm) 3.6 ± 0.7a 126.7 ± 23.9b
Setule distance (µm) 2.3 ± 0.2a 18.7 ± 3.6b
Filter area (cm2) 16.8 ± 2.2a 339.9 ± 33.5b

a,b The significant difference between clear seawater, mixed and biofloc treatments for each stage is marked with different letters (p < 0.05).

Download Excel Table
fas-26-11-649-g3
Fig. 3. Illustrations of the third maxilliped of Fenneropenaeus chinensis. A: Third maxilliped of postlarval stage. A’: Seta of distal margin of propodus. A’’: Seat of carpus. A’’’: Seta of exopod. B: Third maxilliped of adult stage. Scale bars: A, B = 1 mm; A’, A’’ = 0.5 mm; A’’’ = 0.1 mm.
Download Original Figure
Table 6. Definition and classification of setal characteristics and setations on the segments of the third maxilliped endopod of Fenneropenaeus chinensis postlarvae and adults
Segments Postlarvae Adults
Ischium Mainly simple setae Mainly simple setae
Merus A row of simple setae Mainly plumose
Carpus A row of simple, serrulate setae Mainly plumose
Propodus Five cuspidate setae distally, simple and serrulate long setae Mainly plumose
Dactylus 0.3 × propodus, simple and serrulate setae on entire surface Mainly plumose
Download Excel Table

Discussions

There were significant differences between the water treatments in some of the water quality parameters. The pH in the biofloc water was lower than that of the seawater. It is to the activities of nitrifying bacteria and CO2 production by biofloc. The concentration of inorganic nitrogen by-products was significantly higher in the biofloc and mixed water due to increased metabolism associated with the rich microbial community in these bins. But, all the water quality parameters were within acceptable ranges reported by other researchers for optimal survival and growth of F. chinensis (Chen et al., 1990; Hu & Lu, 1990). Ray et al. (2010) and Samocha et al. (2007) suggested that the TSS concentrations should range from 460 to 500 mg/L of L. vannamei. But, in the present study, concentrations below the 15 mg/L TSS concentration were found optimal for F. chinensis postlarvae (Tables 2 and 4). A TSS concentration higher than 15 mg/L significantly decreased the survival rate as low as 32%–36%, which is probably because increased TSS concentrations caused by particle accumulation can boost oxygen demand, cause gill fouling in cultured species, suppress beneficial algal growth, and promote blooms of potentially harmful microorganisms (Brune et al., 2003; Hargreaves, 2006; Liltved & Cripps, 1999). In this study, the survival and specific growth rate was significantly different between the treatments. It is immune response relationship to energy consumption their treatments shrimp could not grow. Tyler et al. (2006) said 7.5% increase in energy consumption occurs in response to non-pathogenic immune stimulation. Also, each mean total bacterial count ranged was 9.53E+05 and 2.30E+06 mL–1 in mixed and biofloc water (Table 3). Biofloc stimulates parts of the shrimp immune system (Kim et al., 2014). Crab et al. (2010) said the biofloc technology protected shrimp from pathogen Vibriosis. In contrast, the present study found that expressions of the immune-related genes were lower in the biofloc and mixed water than in the seawater. Finally, too high concentrations of TSS and large amounts of bacteria may give stress to F. chinensis postlarvae. They cannot any effect of growth and immune responses. Our previous study investigated the effect of bioflocs on immune activity and growth rate of L. vannamei postlarvae. As they were cultured in Biofloc Technology-based systems, the shrimp evidently consumed the microbial floc in situ (Ekasari et al., 2014) and (Crab et al., 2012) so that the increases in total haemocyte number and PO activity point in the direction of a stimulatory effect of the (digested) biofloc on shrimp immunity. Kim et al. (2014) clearly showed that the expression levels of proPO, PPAE1 and SP1 genes, which regulate the PO activation systems. The authors expect similar results from this study. But different species bring different results. In this study we using postlarvae other different age we need confirm. In Fig. 1, the PPAE and SP1 genes are significantly high in seawater, and the proPO genes are significantly high in biofloc and mixed water the activity of initial precursor genes such as PPAE, SP1, and Mas appears at the end of the series of experiments, and in the biofloc and mixed waters it is believed that the last proPO activity. On the other hands, in adults, PO activity was significantly higher by two to three times in biofloc and mixed waters, which is consistent with other previous studies (Fig. 2). The survival and growth in postlarvae were higher in seawater, but not at a level that could be said to be better for immune-related gene activity. But, the adults showed high growth in mixed and biofloc water, and high PO activity, an immune indicator (Table 5). This is thought to be related to the increase in filtration area in adults than in postlarvae, and the increase in the efficiency of using floating bioflocs.

It is known that the maxilliped structure of L. vannamei that filter out and feed on floating bioflocs forms a net structure (Kent et al., 2011), and in this study, the filter area formed by the maxilliped structure during the postlarvae is small, and adults form a wide net similar to L.vannamei, resulting in increased filtration and consequently, the bioflocs used in the body contribute to stimulating innate immunity (Kim et al., 2015).

Feeding strategy for a particular species can be evaluated by examining the mouthparts and gut. For example, an increased robustness of the mandibles and complexity of the gastric mill can be correlated to a carnivorous food selection in crustaceans (Kunze & Anderson, 1979). Changes in feeding preference and capability in decapods have been previously associated with changes in the structure and function of indigestive and digestive organs (Cox & Johnston, 2004; Nishida et al., 1990).

Indeed, a range of morphological changes in the mouthparts and gut of Lysmata amboinernsis were observed during the larval development. The potential role of the feeding appendages can be deduced from their form and the type of setae. Accordingly, in the early and late larval stage of L. amboinensis, the maxillae may primarily function for respiration. With the long plumose setae on the scaphognathite creating a current flow over the developing gills. The shorter plumose setae on the endites may act as a net to prevent entry of particles to the branchial chamber (Crain, 1999; Factor, 1978; Farmer, 1974). Our previous study about a different contribution of bioflocs is closely related to the morphological features of the setae on the third maxilliped of these species (Kim et al., 2015).

Conclusions

In this study, the role of the maxilliped seta and setula seems to change as F. chinensis develops from postlarvae to adult. In the adult age, the third maxilliped may act principally as filter feeding in the mouth region, as evidenced by their dense of pappose setae in water column. It means growing a F. chinensis the thrid maxilliped setae was densely and setula was long bring these results, and that a significant increase in the area of filter feeding is also related to the efficiency of using floating biofloc.

The data supporting this is that in addition to innate immune activity in adults, growth and total production shows a significantly higher than in seawater.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This study was carried out with support of Research on technology to discriminated damage from natural disasters of aquaculture organisms (R2023041) of National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study conformed to the guidance of animal ethical treatment for the care and use of experimental animals.

References

1.

Alexander CG, Hindley JPR. The mechanism of food ingestion by the banana prawn, Penaeus merguiensis. Mar Behav Physiol. 1985; 12:33-46

2.

Bae SH, Kim BR, Kang BJ, Tsutsui N, Okutsu T, Shinji J, et al. Molecular cloning of prophenoloxidase and the effects of dietary β-glucan and rutin on immune response in hemocytes of the fleshy shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012; 33:597-604

3.

Brune DE, Schwartz G, Eversole AG, Collier JA, Schwedler TE. Intensification of pond aquaculture and high rate photosynthetic systems. Aquac Eng. 2003; 28:65-86

4.

Chen JC, Ting YY, Lin JN, Lin MN. Lethal effects of ammonia and nitrite on Penaeus chinensis juveniles. Mar Biol. 1990; 107:427-31

5.

Cox SL, Jeffs AG, Davis M. Developmental changes in the mouthparts of juvenile Caribbean spiny lobster, Panulirus argus: implications for aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2008; 283:168-74

6.

Cox SL, Johnston DJ. Developmental changes in foregut functioning of packhorse lobster, Jasus (Sagmariasus) verreauxi (Decapoda : Palinuridae), phyllosoma larvae. Mar Freshw Res. 2004; 55:145-53

7.

Crab R, Chielens B, Wille M, Bossier P, Verstraete W. The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional value of bioflocs, a feed for Macrobrachium rosenbergii postlarvae. Aquac Res. 2010; 41:559-67

8.

Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture. 2012; 356-357:351-6

9.

Crain JA. Functional morphology of prey ingestion by Placetron wosnessenskii Schalfeew zoeae (Crustacea: Anomura: Lithodidae). Biol Bull. 1999; 197:207-18

10.

Ekasari J, Azhar MH, Surawidjaja EH, Nuryati S, De Schryver P, Bossier P. Immune response and disease resistance of shrimp fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014; 41:332-9

11.

Factor JR. Morphology of the mouthparts of larval lobsters, Homarus americanus (Decapoda: Nephropidae), with special emphasis on their setae. Biol Bull. 1978; 154:383-408

12.

Farmer AS. The functional morphology of the mouthparts and pereiopods of Nephrops norvegicus (L.) (Decapoda: Nephropidae). J Nat Hist. 1974; 8:121-42

13.

Garm A. Mechanical functions of setae from the mouth apparatus of seven species of decapod crustaceans. J Morphol. 2004a; 260:85-100

14.

Garm A. Revising the definition of the crustacean seta and setal classification systems based on examinations of the mouthpart setae of seven species of decapods. Zool J Linn Soc. 2004b; 142:233-52

15.

Gorman MJ, Paskewitz SM. Serine proteases as mediators of mosquito immune responses. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2001; 31:257-62

16.

Hargreaves JA. Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture. Aquac Eng. 2006; 34:344-63

17.

Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S. Use of nucleopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977; 33:1225-8

18.

Hu Q, Lu J. Preliminary analysis of the relation of growth of Penaeus orientalis Kishinouye with environmental factors. Donghai Mar Sci. 1990; 8:58-62.

19.

Huang TS, Wang H, Lee SY, Johansson MW, Söderhäll K, Cerenius L. A cell adhesion protein from the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus, a serine proteinase homologue similar to Drosophila masquerade. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275:9996-10001

20.

Huang X, Zhou H, Zhang H. The effect of Sargassum fusiforme polysaccharide extracts on vibriosis resistance and immune activity of the shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006; 20:750-7

21.

Janeway CA, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002; 20:197-216

22.

Jang IK, Jun JC, Jo GJ, Cho YR, Seo HC, Kim BL, et al. Polyculture of fleshy shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis and white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with river puffer Takifugu obscurus in shrimp ponds. J Aquac. 2007; 20:278-88.

23.

Jang IK, Meng XH, Seo HC, Cho YR, Kim BR, Ayyaru G, et al. A TaqMan real-time PCR assay for quantifying white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infections in wild broodstock and hatchery-reared postlarvae of fleshy shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Aquaculture. 2009; 287:40-5

24.

Jang IK, Pang Z, Yu J, Kim SK, Seo HC, Cho YR. Selectively enhanced expression of prophenoloxidase activating enzyme 1 (PPAE1) at a bacteria clearance site in the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. BMC Immunol. 2011b; 12:70

25.

Jang IK, Suriakala K, Kim JS, Meng XH, Choi TJ. A TaqMan real-time PCR assay for quantifying type III hepatopancreatic parvovirus infections in wild broodstocks and hatchery-reared postlarvae of Fenneropenaeus chinensis in Korea. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011a; 21:1109-15

26.

Jiang H, Wang Y, Yu XQ, Zhu Y, Kanost M. Prophenoloxidase-activating proteinase-3 (PAP-3) from Manduca sexta hemolymph: a clip-domain serine proteinase regulated by serpin-1J and serine proteinase homologs. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003; 33:1049-60

27.

Jiménez-Vega F, Vargas-Albores F, Söderhäll K. Characterisation of a serine proteinase from Penaeus vannamei haemocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2005; 18:101-8

28.

Johnston DJ, Alexander CG. Functional morphology of the mouthparts and alimentary tract of the slipper lobster Thenus orientalis (Decapoda: Scyllaridae). Mar Freshw Res. 1999; 50:213-23

29.

Kent M, Browdy CL, Leffler JW. Consumption and digestion of suspended microbes by juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2011; 319:363-8

30.

Kim SK, Guo Q, Jang IK. Effect of biofloc on the survival and growth of the postlarvae of three penaeids (Litopenaeus vannamei, Fenneropenaeus chinensis, and Marsupenaeus japonicus) and their biofloc feeding efficiencies, as related to the morphological structure of the third maxilliped. J Crustacean Biol. 2015; 35:41-50

31.

Kim SK, Jang IK, Kim SR, Jeon JC, Kim SK. Effects of artificial substrates on the growth and immunology of postlarvae of Marsupenaeus japonicus (Spence Bate, 1888) (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata: Penaeidae) reared in biofloc. J Crustacean Biol. 2021; 41:ruab044

32.

Kim SK, Pang Z, Seo HC, Cho YR, Samocha T, Jang IK. Effect of bioflocs on growth and immune activity of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei postlarvae. Aquac Res. 2014; 45:362-71

33.

Kirchman D, Sigda J, Kapuscinski R, Mitchell R. Statistical analysis of the direct count method for enumerating bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982; 44:376-82

34.

Kunze J, Anderson DT. Functional morphology of the mouthparts and gastric mill in the hermit crabs Clibanarius taeniatus (Milne Edwards), Clibanarius virescens (Krauss), Paguristes squamosus McCulloch and Dardanus setifer (Milne-Edwards) (Anomura: Paguridae). Mar Freshw Res. 1979; 30:683-722

35.

Lee SY, Lee BL, Söderhäll K. Processing of crayfish hemocyanin subunits into phenoloxidase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 322:490-6

36.

Lee SY, Söderhäll K. Characterization of a pattern recognition protein, a masquerade-like protein, in the freshwater crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus. J Immunol. 2001; 166:7319-26

37.

Liltved H, Cripps SJ. Removal of particle-associated bacteria by prefiltration and ultraviolet irradiation. Aquac Res. 1999; 30:445-50

38.

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25:402-8

39.

Loker ES, Adema CM, Zhang SM, Kepler TB. Invertebrate immune systems: not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood. Immunol Rev. 2004; 198:10-24

40.

McConaugha J. Alternative feeding mechanisms in megalopae of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Mar Biol. 2002; 140:1227-33

41.

Medzhitov R, Janeway C. Innate immune recognition: mechanisms and pathways. Immunol Rev. 2000; 173:89-97

42.

Meng XH, Jang IK, Seo HC, Cho YR. A TaqMan real-time PCR assay for survey of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infections in Litopenaeus vannamei postlarvae and shrimp of farms in different grow-out seasons. Aquaculture. 2010; 310:32-37

43.

Nishida S, Quigley BD, Booth JD, Nemoto T, Kittaka J. Comparative morphology of the mouthparts and foregut of the final-stage phyllosoma, puerulus, and postpuerulus of the rock lobster Jasus edwardsii (Decapoda: Palinuridae). J Crustacean Biol. 1990; 10:293-305

44.

Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ. Families of cysteine peptidases. Methods Enzymol. 1994; 244:461-86

45.

Ray AJ, Lewis BL, Browdy CL, Leffler JW. Suspended solids removal to improve shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production and an evaluation of a plant-based feed in minimal-exchange, super intensive culture systems. Aquaculture. 2010; 299:89-98

46.

Samocha TM, Patnaik S, Speed M, Ali AM, Burger JM, Almeida RV, et al. Use of molasses as carbon source in limited discharge nursery and grow-out systems for Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac Eng. 2007; 36:184-91

47.

Shi XZ, Zhao XF, Wang JX. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of chymotrypsin-like serine protease from the Chinese shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008; 25:589-97

48.

Sriphaijit T, Flegel TW, Senapin S. Characterization of a shrimp serine protease homolog, a binding protein of yellow head virus. Dev Comp Immunol. 2007; 31:1145-58

49.

Suthers IM. Functional morphology of the mouthparts and gastric mill in Penaeus plebejus Hess (Decapoda : Penaeidea). Aust J Mar Freshw Res. 1984; 35:785-92

50.

Tyler ER, Adams S, Mallon EB. An immune response in the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris leads to increased food consumption. BMC Physiol. 2006; 6:6

51.

Zhang MM, Xu Y, Kim S, Wu Q, Qi Z, Pang Z, et al. Molecular characterization, structure and expression analysis of a Ras-related nuclear (Ran) gene in white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Int J Agric Biol. 2019; 21:11-8.