Table 2. Changes in pH values of houndfish treated by DW, 1% AA, CTS 1, CTS 2, CTS 3, CTS 4 during ice storage
| Samples | Storage time (days) |
| 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
| DW | 6.17 ± 0.03a | 6.18 ± 0.05a | 6.26 ± 0.02b | 6.31 ± 0.02d | 6.41 ± 0.04d | 6.51 ± 0.04d |
| 1% AA | 6.13 ± 0.13a | 6.15 ± 0.11a | 6.22 ± 0.06ab | 6.29 ± 0.01cd | 6.35 ± 0.05c | 6.47 ± 0.02d |
| CTS 1 | 6.14 ± 0.06a | 6.16 ± 0.04a | 6.20 ± 0.02a | 6.26 ± 0.02bc | 6.31 ± 0.02b | 6.40 ± 0.02c |
| CTS 2 | 6.10 ± 0.02a | 6.14 ± 0.02a | 6.19 ± 0.03a | 6.25 ± 0.02bc | 6.29 ± 0.01b | 6.38 ± 0.02bc |
| CTS 3 | 6.09 ± 0.07a | 6.11 ± 0.04a | 6.17 ± 0.03a | 6.20 ± 0.02a | 6.24 ± 0.01a | 6.30 ± 0.01a |
| CTS 4 | 6.10 ± 0.05a | 6.13 ± 0.03a | 6.18 ± 0.01a | 6.24 ± 0.04ab | 6.28 ± 0.02ab | 6.34 ± 0.04ab |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
Values with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
DW, houndfish treated with distilled water; 1% AA, houndfish treated with 1% acetic acid; CTS 1, houndfish treated with 0.5% chitosan; CTS 2, houndfish treated with 1% chitosan; CTS 3, houndfish treated with 1.5% chitosan; CTS 4, houndfish treated with 2% chitosan.