Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Optimization and production of protein hydrolysate containing antioxidant activity from tuna cooking juice concentrate by response surface methodology

Mookdaporn Kiettiolarn1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-3479, Lalitphan Kitsanayanyong1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-3785, Jirawan Maneerote1, Sasimanas Unajak2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-3978, Pramvadee Tepwong1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-1580
1Department of Fishery Products, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*Corresponding author: Pramvadee Tepwong, Department of Fishery Products, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. Tel: +66-2-942-8644-122, E-mail: ffispdt@ku.ac.th

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Apr 12, 2022; Revised: May 27, 2022; Accepted: May 31, 2022

Published Online: Jun 30, 2022

Abstract

To optimize the hydrolysis conditions in the production of antioxidant hydrolysates from tuna cooking juice concentrate (TC) to maximize the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, TC containing 48.91% protein was hydrolyzed with Alcalase 2.4 L, and response surface methodology (RSM) was applied. The optimum hydrolysis conditions included a 2.2% (w/v) Alcalase concentration and 281 min hydrolysis time, resulting in the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity of 66.49% (0.98 ìmol Trolox/mg protein). The analysis of variance for RSM showed that hydrolysis time was an important factor that significantly affected the process (p < 0.05). The effects of different drying methods (freeze drying, hot air drying, and vacuum drying) on the DPPH radical scavenging activity and amino acid (AA) profiles of TC hydrolysate (TCH) were evaluated. Vacuum-dried TCH (VD) exhibited an increase in DPPH radical scavenging activity of 81.28% (1.20 ìmol Trolox/mg protein). The VD samples were further fractionated by ultrafiltration. The AA profiles and antioxidant activities in terms of the DPPH radical scavenging activity, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power, and ferrous ion chelating activity were investigated. Glutamic acid, glycine, arginine, and cysteine were the major AAs found in the TCH fractions. The highest DPPH radical scavenging activity was found in the VD-1 fraction (> 5 kDa). The VD-3 fraction (< 10 kDa) exhibited the highest ABTS radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power. The ferrous ion chelating activity was the highest in VD-1 and VD-2 (5 to 10 kDa). In conclusion, this study provided the optimal conditions to obtain high antioxidant activities through TCH production, and these conditions could provide a basis for the future application of TCH as a functional food ingredient.

Keywords: Antioxidant properties; Byproduct utilization; Protein hydrolysate; Response surface methodology; Tuna cooking juice concentrate

Introduction

A tuna cooking juice is one of the byproducts of the canned tuna industry and is estimated to comprise 10% to 14% of liquid byproducts that have long been underutilized (Prasertsan et al., 1988). Indeed, the tuna cooking juice and tuna cooking juice concentrate (TC) are rich in proteins (Ciou et al., 2020). The protein content in tuna cooking juice and TC accounts for 3.75% to 5.65% and 48.91% of the content, respectively, which may serve as potential protein sources. However, the utilizing of TC is limited due to its physical properties, including dark brown coloration, high viscosity, and fishy odor.

Hydrolysis of fish protein helps improving the color and appearance of the juice and removing the fishy odor, and is important for the generation of physiologically and nutritionally important peptides in proteins (Mongkonkamthorn et al., 2021). Protein hydrolysis can be performed through several methods, including chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis. Among these methods, enzymatic proteolysis is the most common because, compared to chemical approaches, the hydrolysis conditions are milder, and the enzyme can cleave specific peptide bonds, resulting in the production of peptides with various sizes and free amino acids (AAs) (Tapal & Tiku, 2019). Several studies have been conducted to elucidate whether protein hydrolysates/bioactive peptides exhibit promising antioxidant (Phongthai et al., 2018), anti-inflammatory (Cheng et al., 2015), and angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activities (Mongkonkamthorn et al., 2021). These results suggest the suitability of protein hydrolysates/bioactive peptides as functional food ingredients. Therefore, research has been focused on improving the utilization of protein byproducts by producing protein hydrolysates.

Optimization of hydrolysis conditions is critical for the production of desirable protein hydrolysates because the physical and functional properties, especially antioxidant activities, of the hydrolysates are affected by several factors, including the hydrolysis conditions (enzyme concentration, hydrolysis time, pH, and temperature), enzyme types, and substrates (Auwal et al., 2017; Zhuang et al., 2009). When several factors are involved in the optimization process, each factor must be individually examined, which is time-consuming, results in low precision and may lead to a false optimum. Therefore, the design of experiments method is a widely accepted, fast alternative approach due to its wide range of experimental designs, i.e., full factorial design, fractional factorial design, the Taguchi method, and the response surface method (RSM) (Wahid & Nadir, 2013).

RSM is generally used for the optimization of experimental parameters by employing mathematical and statistical techniques for reducing treatment numbers and detecting the effects of experimental parameters (Kumari & Gupta, 2019). RSM has been applied for optimizing the production conditions of protein hydrolysate from several sources, e.g., protein hydrolysate from jellyfish (Rhopilema esculentum) (Zhuang et al., 2009) and skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) dark muscle (Mongkonkamthorn et al., 2021). In both cases, hydrolysates were successfully produced with high 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activities. These studies suggested that RSM was a potential tool for the optimization of the production conditions of protein hydrolysates. To the best of our knowledge, optimizing the production of TC hydrolysates (TCH) by RSM is limited.

Based on the abovementioned description, the aim of this study was to optimize the hydrolysis conditions to produce TCH with high antioxidant properties by RSM. The enzyme (Alcalase) concentration and hydrolysis time were varied to maximize the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH. The effect of different drying methods on the radical scavenging activity by DPPH assay was evaluated. In addition, TCH was further fractionated based on molecular weight, and several antioxidant activities and AA profiles were determined.

Materials and Methods

Raw materials

TC was obtained from a canned tuna processing plant in Samut Sakhon province, Thailand. It was packed in polyethylene bags and transported in an icebox at approximately 4°C to the laboratory (Kasetsart University, Bangkok) within 2 h. After arriving, TC was mixed thoroughly, and a portion was taken for proximate composition (protein, moisture, lipid, and ash) analyses (AOAC, 2000; analytical method No. 920.153, 950.46, 960.39, and 928.08, respectively), carbohydrate content analyses (the content was calculated by subtracting the sum of the protein, moisture, lipid, and ash from 100), and physical property (pH) analyses using an MM-60R pH meter (DKK-TOA, Tokyo, Japan). The remaining portions of TC were stored in airtight bottles at –18°C for subsequent use.

For subsequent color analysis and DPPH radical scavenging activity assay, TC was thawed at 4°C for 24 h, heated at 60°C for 10 min, and maintained at 4°C overnight to promote the stratification of lipids (wax formation above the TC) and insoluble materials (precipitation at the bottom layer of TC) (Kasiwut et al., 2015). The lipids and insoluble materials were separated by cloth filtration. A few portions of the filtrated TC were taken and frozen at –18°C for 48 h prior to freeze drying using a Scanvac Coolsafe Touch 95–15 freeze dryer (Labogene, Lillerød, Denmark) for 74 ± 2 h. The condenser temperature and pressure of the freeze dryer were set at –50°C and 0.002 mbar, respectively. Then, the resulting lyophilized TC was ground and subjected to color analysis using an Ultrascan XE 205 HunterLab colorimeter (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Reston, VA, USA) and DPPH radical scavenging activity analysis as described in the DPPH radical scavenging activity section. The remaining portions of the filtrated TC were used to prepare TCH as described in the following section.

Preparation of tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate

TCH was prepared from TC by Alcalase 2.4 L FG (E.C. 3.4.21.62; Novozymes, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) hydrolysis according to our preliminary trial, the manufacturer’s protocol of proteases for biocatalysis (Novozymes, 2016), and the method described by Dong et al. (2008) with slight modifications. Briefly, TC was diluted with water (1:2 [w/v]) based on our preliminary trial (this sample-to-water ratio resulted in the highest value of DPPH radical scavenging activity [data not shown]). The sample was adjusted to pH 8 by dropwise additions of 0.1 M NaOH under continuous stirring and was preheated at 60°C by incubation in a water bath (Memmert, Bavaria, Germany) for 20 min. Then, enzymatic hydrolysis was performed using Alcalase, following the conditions described in Table 1. After hydrolysis, Alcalase was inactivated by heating the reaction mixture in boiling water at 100°C for 15 min. Then, TCH (supernatant) was obtained after centrifugation at 10,000×g for 15 min at 4°C using a Suprema 21 refrigerated centrifuge (Tomy Seiko, Tokyo, Japan) and was subjected to freeze drying as described in the Raw Material Section.

Table 1. Codes of the independent variables and experimental design for enzymatic hydrolysis of tuna cooking juice concentrate
Runs Independent variables DPPH radical scavenging activity (%)
Coded Uncoded
X1(%) X2(min) X1(%) X2(min) Experimental Predicted
1 0 0 2 180 63.21 65.56
2 0 0 2 180 68.26 65.56
3 0 1.414 2 350 67.94 67.02
4 –1 –1 1 60 49.39 46.53
5 –1 1 1 300 62.49 60.45
6 0 –1.414 2 10.30 44.54 44.78
7 –1.414 0 0.60 180 48.36 51.99
8 1.414 0 3.40 180 60.74 67.77
9 1 1 3 300 61.78 65.37
10 1 –1 3 60 45.07 47.85
11 0 0 2 180 67.58 65.56
12 0 0 2 180 62.92 65.56
13 0 0 2 180 65.80 65.56

X1 = Alcalase concentration and X2 = hydrolysis time.

DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.

Download Excel Table
Experimental design

RSM was used to optimize the production conditions to maximize the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH. Central composite design (CCD) was employed by two factors, the Alcalase concentration (X1) and hydrolysis time (X2). Each factor was varied by five levels (coded factor levels at –1.414, –1, 0, 1, and 1.414; uncoded factor levels of X1 at 0.6%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 3.4% and of X2 at 10.30, 60, 180, 300, and 350 min), and various hydrolysis conditions were predicted, as shown in Table 1. In total, there were 9 conditions and 13 runs (5 runs for the central points). All TCHs were produced and their DPPH radical scavenging activity was analyzed. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables is illustrated in Equation (1). A three-dimensional response surface graph and a contour graph were also plotted to demonstrate the relationship between the levels of independent variables and the outcome or response. Minitab ver. 17 (Minitab, State College, PA, USA) was used for the experimental design, data analysis, and model building in CCD and to generate three-dimensional response surface and contour plots.

Y=β 0 + β 1 X 1 + β 2 X 2 + β 3 X 1 X 2 + β 4 X 1 2 + β 5 X 2 2
(1)

where Y is the DPPH radical scavenging activity, X1 is the Alcalase concentration, X2 is the hydrolysis time, β0 is the constant coefficient, β1 and β2 are linear coefficients, β3 is the interaction coefficient, and β4 and β5 are quadratic coefficients.

Drying of tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate

The TCH that was produced under optimal conditions (Fig. 1A) was spread in an aluminum tray and dried by the following methods: 1) freeze drying, 2) hot air drying, and 3) vacuum drying. Freeze dried TCH (FD) was obtained as described in the Raw Materials Section, and a few portions of the FD were subjected to proximate composition (AOAC, 2000) and physical property analyses. Hot air dried TCH (OD) was obtained using a UN110 hot air oven (Memmert) at 70°C for 80 h. A VO101 vacuum oven (Memmert) set at 70°C and 72 mbar for 76 h was used to obtain vacuum dried TCH (VD). The resultant TCH powders from each of the drying methods (moisture content < 10%) were stored at –18°C for the latter AA analysis, DPPH radical scavenging activity analysis, and ultrafiltration.

fas-25-6-335-g1
Fig. 1. Response optimization and response surface plots for the production conditions of TCH. Response optimization for independent variables, predicted responses and level of desirability (A), contour plot (B), and three-dimensional plot (C). TCH, tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate; X1, Alcalase concentration (%); X2, hydrolysis time (min); DPPH, 2,2 -diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Download Original Figure
Ultrafiltration

The VD samples were dissolved in deionized sterile water to obtain a final concentration of 100 mg/mL and were subjected to ultrafiltration using two molecular weight cutoff membranes (MWCO; 5 and 10 kDa; Corning, New York, NY, USA). Initially, 14 mL of VD solution (100 mg/mL) was placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube containing 10 kDa MWCO. The protein was separated using a UNIVERSAL 32R refrigerated centrifuge (Hettich-Zentrifugen, Tuttlingen, Germany) that was set at 6,000×g for 30 min at 4°C. The resulting solutions, above (> 10 kDa) and below (< 10 kDa) the membrane, were collected. The solution below the membrane was subjected to another ultrafiltration using 5 kDa MWCO with the same centrifugation conditions. The following VD fractions were obtained: 1) VD-1 (MWCO < 5 kDa; the fraction collected below the 5 kDa membrane), 2) VD-2 (MWCO = 5 to 10 kDa; the fraction collected above the 5 kDa membrane), and 3) VD-3 (MWCO > 10 kDa; the fraction collected above the 10 kDa membrane) and were vacuum-dried (Memmert) for subsequent AA analysis and antioxidant activity measurements.

Amino acid analysis (AA analysis)

The AA content was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; 1200 Infinity Series, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol of automated AA analysis using an Agilent Poroshell HPH-C18 column for AA analysis (Agilent Technologies) as described by Long (2021). Briefly, a 0.5-g portion of TCH or TCH fractions (FD, OD, and VD) was hydrolyzed with 5 mL of 6 M HCl in a B-300 oil bath (Buchi, Flawil, Switzerland). After 24 h of incubation at 110°C, the hydrolyzed samples were diluted with 50 mL of HPLC-grade water (Honeywell Burdick and Jackson, Muskegon, MI, USA) to obtain a final concentration of 10 mg/mL and were filtered through a 0.22 μm nylon membrane filter (Filtrex Technologies, Encinitas, CA, USA). Then, a 10-μL portion of the filtrates was subjected to HPLC analysis. Analytes were separated in a Poroshell-120 column (HPH-C18, 4.6 × 100 mm, 2.7 μm) at 40°C. Mobile phase A consisted of 10 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), 10 mM sodium tetraborate (Na2B4O7 · H2O), and 0.5 mM sodium azide (NaN3) (pH 8.2). Mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile, methanol, and water (45:45:10 [v/v/v]). The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min. The gradient condition was set at 2% B from 0 to 0.35 min, 57% B at 13.4 min, 100% B from 13.5 to 15.7 min, and 2% B from 15.8 to 18.0 min. Each eluent was detected by a fluorescence detector with excitation and emission wavelengths of 230 nm and 450 nm, respectively. The AA contents of the TCH and TCH fractions were quantified against a standard curve obtained using an AA standard (Agilent Technologies).

Antioxidant activity
2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was analyzed according to the methods described by Yen & Hsieh (1995) with slight modifications. Briefly, TC, TCH, or TCH fractions (VD-1, VD-2, and VD-3) were individually dissolved in distilled water (10 mg/mL), and 1 mL of the sample solution was mixed with 1 mL of 85% ethanol containing 200 µM DPPH. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark, and the absorbance at 517 nm was determined using an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Trolox (0 to 1.8 µM) was used as a reference standard. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated as illustrated in Equation (2). Data were expressed as a percentage, µmol Trolox/mg protein, or half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50).

DPPH radical scavenging activity(%) =[(A control -A sample )/A control ] × 100
(2)

where Acontrol is the absorbance of the reaction mixture without a sample, and Asample is the absorbance of the reaction mixture with a sample or Trolox.

2,2’-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging activity

The 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging activity was determined following the methods described by Alemán et al. (2011) with slight modifications. Briefly, the ABTS radical cation (ABTS•+) was generated in the reaction of 14.8 mM ABTS and 5.2 mM potassium persulfate. After 12 to 16 h of incubation at room temperature in the dark, the absorbance at 734 nm of the ABTS solution was adjusted to 0.700 ± 0.02 by adding 200 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.2 (1:1 [v/v]). One milliliter of this solution was mixed with 0.1 mL of 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8.2) containing an individual TCH fraction (10 mg/mL) and 0.9 mL of deionized water. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min in the dark. Then, the absorbance at 734 nm was determined by an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) against Trolox (0 to 200 µM) as a reference standard. The ABTS radical scavenging activity of TCH fractions was reported as µmol Trolox/mg protein.

Ferric reducing antioxidant power

The ferric reducing antioxidant power was determined following the methods described by Oyaizu (1986) with slight modifications. Briefly, a 1-mL portion of aqueous TCH fractions (10 mg/mL) was mixed with 1 mL of phosphate buffer (200 mM, pH 6.6) and 1 mL of 1% (w/v) potassium ferric cyanide. After incubation at 50°C for 20 min, 1 mL of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid was added to the mixture. A 2.5 mL aliquot of the mixture was taken and mixed with 2.5 mL of deionized water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) ferric chloride. Then, the ferric reducing antioxidant power was determined at 700 nm by an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) against Trolox (0 to 600 µM) as a reference standard. Data were expressed as µmol Trolox/mg protein.

Ferrous ion chelating activity

The ferrous ion chelating activity of the TCH fractions was determined according to the method described by Decker & Welch (1990) with slight modifications. Briefly, dried TCH fractions were individually dissolved in distilled water (10 mg/mL). One milliliter of the sample solution was transferred to another tube and mixed with 3.7 mL of distilled water, 0.1 mL of 0.2 mM ferrous chloride, and 0.2 mL of 5 mM ferrozine. After incubation at room temperature for 10 min, the ferrous ion chelating activity was determined by an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) at 562 nm. EDTA (0 to 0.1 mM) was used as a reference standard, and the ferrous ion chelating activity was calculated as illustrated in Equation (3). Data were expressed as µmol EDTA/mg protein.

Ferrous ion chelating (%) =[(A control -A sample )/A control ] × 100
(3)

where Acontrol is the absorbance of the reaction mixture without a sample, and Asample is the absorbance of the reaction mixture with a sample or EDTA.

Statistical analyses

The statistical analysis of the regression coefficients was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Minitab ver. 17. The fitted value predicted by the response regression equation was compared with the experimental values to validate the model. The statistical analysis of the antioxidant activities of TCH fractions was performed by one-way ANOVA using Duncan’s multiple range test in SPSS ver. 26 (SPSS, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significantly different. All data for each of the experiments are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3).

Results and Discussion

Proximate composition and physical properties of tuna cooking juice concentrate and its hydrolysate

The proximate compositions revealed that protein was a major component found in TC; the protein, moisture, lipid, ash, and carbohydrate contents in TC accounted for 48.91%, 27.98%, 0.39%, 21.73%, and 0.99% of the contents, respectively. Our results are in accordance with other concentrated cooking waters derived from different tuna species, which consisted of 40% to 60% protein as a major component (Ciou et al., 2020; Martínez-Montaño et al., 2021). In addition, the hydrolysis of TC by Alcalase resulted in a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the protein and carbohydrate contents to 58.72% and 18.79%, respectively, but a reduction in the moisture, lipid, and ash contents to 6.05%, 0.04%, and 16.40%, respectively. The increase in protein content could be explained by the decrease in the protein molecular weight and increase in the ionizability and hydrophobicity of TCH after enzymatic hydrolysis, resulting in the higher solubility of protein (Wouters et al., 2016). Similar protein increases have been reported in red meat hydrolysates from mackerel tuna (Euthynnus affinis), which increased the protein content to 89.9% when compared to that of nonhydrolyzed tuna red meat (28.3%) (Parvathy et al., 2018). Overall, our findings were in accordance with the report on protein hydrolysates from bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), by which hydrolysis increased the protein content but decreased the lipid, moisture, and ash contents (Alahmad et al., 2022). These results suggest that byproducts of tuna processing, such as TC, may serve as a good source of protein in the production of value-added fish protein hydrolysate.

The physical properties of TC and TCH revealed that they had slightly acidic pH values of 5.86 and 5.48, respectively. TC had a brown coloration (L* = 14.04, a* = 35.34, and b* = 24.17). However, after enzymatic hydrolysis, the color appearance of TCH was improved as a lighter brown coloration was observed (L* = 32.58, a* = 1.48, and b* = 1.75) (data not shown). Of note, L* was increased, while both a* and b* were decreased in TCH compared to TC, which was in accordance with the findings of Banjongsinsiri et al. (2017). The lighter coloration after hydrolysis was probably due to the degradation of color pigments to colorless compounds. In addition, the differences in peptide size and AA composition between TC and TCH are probably responsible for the color change (Banjongsinsiri et al., 2017).

Results of the central composite design

RSM revealed the effects of the Alcalase concentration and hydrolysis time on the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH. Following the experimental conditions described in Table 1, the results showed that the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH ranged from 44.54% to 68.26% (IC50 = 1.71 to 2.09 mg/mL). The best production conditions for TCH with DPPH radical scavenging activity under CCD were at 2% (w/v) Alcalase and a hydrolysis time of above 180 min, resulting in a DPPH radical scavenging activity of approximately ≥ 63% (Table 1). The model efficiency of the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH was validated (data not shown). Data were linearly distributed, indicating that there were no aberrates in the residual of the results. Therefore, it was concluded that the data had a normal distribution, which was in accordance with the findings of Bahari et al. (2020), in which the data plot of the DPPH radical scavenging activity obtained for sea cucumber (Actinopyga lecanora) hydrolysate was normally distributed. Furthermore, the residuals of the results were evenly distributed between positive and negative values, indicating that the data were independent with stable variance (data not shown).

Response surface modeling and the effect of factors

The ANOVA of the TCH was investigated and is shown in Table 2. The correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9056 indicated that the statistical model was adequate and could represent the relationships between the Alcalase concentration (X1) and hydrolysis time (X2) on the DPPH radical scavenging activity (Y) of TCH. According to Narkprasom et al. (2015), R2 should be close to 1.0, but a value greater than 0.8 is acceptable. The coefficient of variation (CV) was used to describe the dispersion of the data and to represent the precision and reliability of the results. A lower CV value indicates low variation in the mean value of the dataset. The CV value obtained in this study was 15.06% (Table 2), which is quite low, suggesting that the experimental values have good precision and reliability (Šumić et al., 2016). The suitability of the regression equation was assessed based on the lack of fit value, wherein no significant differences were observed for the lack of fit value, suggesting that the regression equation was suitable. The results obtained in this study showed a significant difference in DPPH radical scavenging activity (p < 0.05) without a significant difference (p > 0.05) in the lack of fit values (Table 2). Our results agreed well with the finding of Halim & Sarbon (2017), who investigated the model to produce eel (Monopterus sp.) protein hydrolysate; significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for the DPPH radical scavenging activity but not for the lack of fitness (p > 0.05). These results indicated that the regression equation and the fitness of the data are suitable.

Table 2. Analysis of variance for the effects of enzymatic hydrolysis conditions and their interactions on DPPH radical scavenging activity of tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate
Sources Sum of squares df Mean square F-value p-value
Model 860.30 5 172.06 13.42 0.002
X1 19.48 1 19.48 1.52 0.257
X2 494.58 1 494.58 38.59 0.000
X1X1 224.47 1 224.47 17.51 0.004
X2X2 162.51 1 162.51 12.68 0.009
X1X2 3.25 1 3.25 0.25 0.630
Lack of fit 65.82 3 21.94 3.67 0.121
Pure error 23.90 4 5.97
Total 950.02 12
R 2 0.9056
CV 15.06%

X1 = Alcalase concentration (%) and X2 = hydrolysis time (min).

DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; CV, coefficient of variation.

Download Excel Table

Both independent variables (Alcalase concentration and hydrolysis time) had positive linear and interactive relationships with the DPPH radical scavenging activity. However, quadratic effects revealed negative correlations with DPPH radical scavenging activity, resulting in a curvilinear regression Equation (4) as follows:

Y=65 .56+1 .56X 1 + 7.86 X 2 + 0.90 X 1 X 2 5.68 X 1 2 4.83 X 2 2
(4)

where Y is the DPPH radical scavenging activity, X1 is the Alcalase concentration, and X2 is the hydrolysis time.

Optimization of the hydrolysis conditions

The contour plot and three-dimensional plot and contour plot for the DPPH radical scavenging activity are shown in Fig. 1B and 1C , respectively. These plots show the effects of independent variables (Alcalase concentration and hydrolysis time) on the dependent variable (DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH). The obtained results showed that an increase in the Alcalase concentration and hydrolysis time increased the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH. However, an increase in both variables beyond the optimal point resulted in the reduction of DPPH radical scavenging activity (Fig. 1A). When the enzyme concentration and hydrolysis time increased, the DPPH radical scavenging activity increased, which was probably due to the occurrence of more hydrolysis reactions and the formation of short chained peptides that contained free radical scavenging activity, respectively (Mahdavi-Yekta et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017). On the other hand, the reduction in the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH beyond the optimal point could be explained as follows: 1) the progression of hydrolysis caused the degradation of some antioxidant peptides that had formed at the early stage of hydrolysis and 2) the ratio of enzyme-to-substrate was insufficient for the latter hydrolysis reaction, leading to a reduction in the antioxidant activity of TCH under excess enzyme concentration and hydrolysis time (Mahdavi-Yekta et al., 2019). Similar findings were observed in the study by Wang et al. (2017) and Mongkonkamthorn et al. (2021), in which the DPPH radical scavenging activity of chub mackerel (Pneumatophorus japonicus) and skipjack tuna (K. pelamis) dark muscle protein hydrolysate increased when the enzyme concentration and hydrolysis time increased but gradually decreased when the enzyme concentration and hydrolysis time were excessive.

The raw TC exhibited a DPPH radical scavenging activity of 35.21% (data not shown). After the CCD, the production of TCH under optimal conditions was predicted at 2.2% Alcalase and a hydrolysis time of 281 min (factor levels at 0.2143 and 0.8428, respectively) (Fig. 1A). The validation of the TCH produced under this condition revealed a 66.49% (0.98 µmol Trolox/mg protein) DPPH radical scavenging activity (data not shown). The DPPH radical scavenging activity increased up to 88.84%. In addition, the difference between the predicted (68.98%) and experimental (66.49%) values had a 3.74% error, which was within the acceptable range (5% error). Therefore, the experimental model was accurate within the 95% prediction interval (Choudhary & Pramanik, 2021). The IC50 of TCH produced under the optimal conditions was 1.52 mg/mL (1.37 µmol Trolox/mg protein), which is comparable to that of skipjack tuna (K. pelamis) dark meat hydrolysate (1.1 mg/mL) when optimized by RSM (Mongkonkamthorn et al., 2021).

Effects of drying methods on the amino acid content of tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate

Drying techniques have significant effects on the rheological, physical, and structural traits of protein hydrolysates. The difference in rheological and physical attribute changes in the AA profiles and functionality provides strong insights into protein hydrolysates, such as their antioxidant activity (Dabbour et al., 2022; Uribe et al., 2020). In this part of the study, the effects of drying methods (freeze drying, hot air drying, and vacuum drying) on the AA profiles, which may consequently affect the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH, were investigated.

Per 100 g of protein in all TCHs prepared by different drying methods, cysteine was a major AA component (19.95 to 20.67 g), followed by glycine (14.69 to 15.61 g), glutamic acid (10.25 to 10.80 g), arginine (7.75 to 7.85 g), and alanine (7.32 to 7.76 g). Conversely, tyrosine (1.00 to 1.23 g), isoleucine (1.40 to 1.69 g), and methionine (1.63 to 1.88 g) were observed in the lowest amounts (Table 3). A significant difference (p < 0.05) in AA content with different drying methods was found in glutamic acid, serine, and histidine (Table 3). The highest amounts of glutamic acid and serine content were found in VD, whereas the highest histidine content was found in OD. Some AA contents were less affected by the different drying methods; threonine levels in VD were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in FD and OD. Cysteine was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in VD and FD than in OD. Glycine and alanine were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in VD and OD than in FD. The aspartic acid, arginine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, leucine, lysine, and proline contents were independent (p > 0.05) of the drying method. By grouping these AAs, a significantly higher (p < 0.05) abundance of negatively charged AAs (NCAAs) was found in VD than in FD. The aromatic AAs (AAAs) in VD and FD were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in OD. Essential AAs (EAAs) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in FD and OD than in VD. Positively charged AAs (PCAAs) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in OD than in FD and VD. Hydrophobic AAs (HAAs) were not affected (p > 0.05) by the different drying methods.

Table 3. Effects of different drying methods on AA composition of TCH
AA Sample (g/100 g protein)
FD OD VD
Aspartic acidNS 5.33 ± 0.02 5.36 ± 0.02 5.42 ± 0.07
Glutamic acid 10.25 ± 0.09C 10.57 ± 0.04B 10.80 ± 0.10A
Serine 3.23 ± 0.03B 3.17 ± 0.02C 3.45 ± 0.03A
Histidine* 7.07 ± 0.06B 7.64 ± 0.04A 6.41 ± 0.06C
Glycine 14.69 ± 0.30B 15.52 ± 0.10A 15.61 ± 0.17A
Threonine* 3.13 ± 0.05B 3.13 ± 0.05B 3.24 ± 0.04A
ArginineNS 7.75 ± 0.03 7.75 ± 0.04 7.85 ± 0.07
Alanine 7.32 ± 0.08B 7.65 ± 0.05A 7.76 ± 0.08A
TyrosineNS 1.23 ± 0.23 1.00 ± 0.01 1.15 ± 0.03
Cysteine 20.67 ± 0.10A 19.40 ± 0.09B 19.95 ± 0.62A
Valine* 3.04 ± 0.05A 2.87 ± 0.19AB 2.59 ± 0.27B
Methionine* 1.88 ± 0.15A 1.63 ± 0.02B 1.76 ± 0.03AB
PhenylalanineNS 2.15 ± 0.23 1.99 ± 0.02 2.01 ± 0.05
Isoleucine* 1.69 ± 0.19A 1.63 ± 0.01A 1.40 ± 0.05B
Leucine*NS 3.29 ± 0.13 3.30 ± 0.03 3.34 ± 0.07
Lysine*NS 4.14 ± 0.19 4.37 ± 0.03 4.25 ± 0.05
ProlineNS 3.13 ± 0.32 3.02 ± 0.02 3.02 ± 0.07
EAA 24.24 ± 0.06A 24.57 ± 0.06A 22.99 ± 0.09B
HAANS 55.72 ± 0.34 55.02 ± 0.06 55.43 ± 0.20
AAA 3.38 ± 0.00A 2.99 ± 0.01B 3.17 ± 0.01A
NCAA 15.58 ± 0.05B 15.93 ± 0.02AB 16.22 ± 0.02A
PCAA 18.96 ± 0.09B 19.75 ± 0.00A 18.51 ± 0.01B

Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among the mean value of each treatment (p < 0.05).

Essential AAs.

AA, amino acid; TCH, tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate; FD, freeze dried TCH; OD, hot air dried TCH; VD, vacuum-dried TCH; NS, not significant; EAA, essential AAs; HAA, hydrophobic AAs; AAA, aromatic AAs; NCAA, negatively charged AAs (acidic AAs); PCAA, positively charged AAs (basic AAs).

Download Excel Table

Different thermal treatments may improve, maintain, or reduce the AA content in the hydrolysate depending on the initial AA content or the drying conditions (Uribe et al., 2020). Because the initial AA content in TCH before being subjected to different drying methods was the same, it should not be considered a factor that affects the AA content after drying in this study. However, different drying conditions, i.e., temperature (–50°C for freeze drying or 70°C for hot air drying and vacuum drying) and oxygen concentrations (atmospheric oxygen for hot air drying or vacuum for freeze drying and vacuum drying), played an important role in the AA profiles of hydrolysate. High temperature can increase the AA content due to the possible progression of proteolysis during drying (Uribe et al., 2020). Vacuum conditions, which involve an oxygen-free environment, can prevent compounds from undergoing oxidative degradation (How & Siow, 2020; Jakkranuhwat & Kunchansombat, 2021). Based on the obtained results, we proposed that changes in the AA profiles of TCH under different drying conditions may be due to these reasons.

Effects of drying methods on the DPPH radical scavenging activity of tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate

DPPH is one of the most stable and general organic nitrogen radicals that is commercially available, and it can accept an electron or hydrogen ion and form a stable molecule (Tang et al., 2013). In this study, DPPH activity was altered by the different drying methods. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of VD was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of OD and FD (1.20, 1.07, and 0.98 µmol Trolox/mg protein, respectively), although there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in HAA, which plays an important role in the radical scavenging activity of peptides among treatments (Fig. 2 and Table 3). This was probably due to the protection of the antioxidants present in VD under vacuum conditions (oxygen-free environments) (How & Siow, 2020; Jakkranuhwat & Kunchansombat, 2021). In addition, higher temperatures and longer drying times under a vacuum may lead to the alteration of the structural conformation of peptides. Consequently, the formation of new compounds with antioxidant activities, such as melanoidins derived from the Maillard reaction, might occur (Uribe et al., 2020). These factors caused VD to exhibit a significantly higher (p < 0.05) DPPH radical scavenging activity than that of FD and OD, which lacked the heat treatment and oxygen-free conditions, respectively. The results of this study were consistent with the finding of Uribe et al. (2020), wherein vacuum drying, which uses heat treatment and vacuum conditions, remarkably increases the DPPH radical scavenging activity of brown algae (Durvillaea antarctica) compared to that of various drying methods. Therefore, we recommend vacuum drying as a suitable drying method to produce protein hydrolysates that exhibit high DPPH radical scavenging activity.

fas-25-6-335-g2
Fig. 2. Effects of different drying methods on DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH. All data were reported as mean ± SD (n = 3). Uppercase letters indicate significant difference among the mean value of each treatment group (p < 0.05). DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; TCH, tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate; FD, freeze dried TCH; OD, hot air dried TCH; VD, vacuum-dried TCH.
Download Original Figure
Amino acid content in the tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate fractions

VD was subjected to ultrafiltration using 3 MWCO. The following VD fraction were obtained: VD-1 (MWCO < 5 kDa), VD-2 (MWCO = 5 to 10 kDa), and VD-3 (MWCO > 10 kDa). The predominant AA contents in all VD fractions per 100 g protein were 13.24 to 15.17, 12.19 to 13.76, 10.26 to 11.10, and 8.95 to 12.03 g for cysteine, glycine, glutamic acid, and arginine, respectively. A high yield of these amino products was obtained, which can be attributed to enzymatic hydrolysis (specifically by Alcalase). The results obtained in this study were in accordance with the previous finding by Henriques et al. (2021), in which hydrolysis by Alcalase resulted in high levels of glutamic acid, glycine, and arginine from protein byproducts hydrolysates in gurnard fish (Trigla spp.). Additionally, a high yield of glutamic acid was also associated with a high content of glutamic acid in tuna (Thunnus albacares and Thunnus obesus) meat (Peng et al., 2013). However, the high contents of cysteine in our study differed from other findings (Henriques et al., 2021). This might be due to the high content of cysteine that originally existed in TC (approximately 21 g/100 g protein), and this was different from fish protein byproducts hydrolysate, which had low contents of cysteine (approximately 0.4 g/100 g protein).

Aside from cysteine and glycine, enzymatic hydrolysis by Alcalase may also produce other HAAs, such as alanine, leucine, isoleucine, and proline (Tacias-Pascacio et al., 2020). The presence of HAA may improve the solubility of peptides in hydrophobic environments. This helps simplify interactions between peptides and helps donate protons to radical species. Thus, hydrophobic interactions among HAA residues may enhance physicochemical and functional properties, such as the antioxidant activity of peptides (Karimi et al., 2020).

Significant changes in AA contents after fractionation were observed in cysteine, glycine, arginine, histidine, and proline (Table 4). Cysteine and glycine were present at significantly higher amounts (p < 0.05) in the larger fraction (VD-3) than in the smaller fractions (VD-1 and VD-2). Arginine and proline were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in VD-1 than in VD-2 and VD-3. Histidine was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in VD-2 than in VD-1 and VD-3. The remaining AA contents were not affected (p > 0.05) by fractionation. By grouping the AAs, the HAA, AAA and NCAA contents of VD-3 were found to be the highest among fractions, accounting for 52.11, 3.81, and 16.57 g/100 g protein, respectively. The highest content of PCAA was found in VD-2 at 25.24 g/100 g protein. EAA, a category of AAs that cannot be synthesized in humans alone, was provided at high amounts by each of the VD fractions (Table 4). The EAA content (except for undetected tryptophan, which cannot be hydrolyzed by acid) accounted for 27.13, 29.29, and 26.53 g/100 g sample in VD-1, VD-2, and VD-3, respectively. These amounts were slightly different but were comparable to the standard set by the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization for the dietary intake of EAA for adults (27.70 g/100 g of protein) (FAO/WHO, 2007). However, of note, unlike the FAO/WHO standard, the amount of EAA in the VD fractions reported in this study lacked tryptophan.

Table 4. AA composition of VD fractions
AA Sample (g/100 g protein)
VD-1 VD-2 VD-3
Aspartic acidNS 5.54 ± 0.18 5.17 ± 0.34 5.46 ± 0.22
Glutamic acidNS 10.26 ± 0.26 10.41 ± 0.89 11.10 ± 0.35
SerineNS 3.60 ± 0.14 3.48 ± 0.27 3.78 ± 0.07
Histidine* 8.19 ± 0.43B 9.79 ± 0.61A 5.72 ± 0.08C
Glycine 12.19 ± 0.30B 12.86 ± 0.86B 13.76 ± 0.27A
Threonine*NS 3.15 ± 0.27 3.05 ± 0.26 3.22 ± 0.05
Arginine 12.03 ± 0.96A 10.52 ± 0.30B 8.95 ± 0.12C
Alanine*NS 7.83 ± 0.99 7.44 ± 0.63 7.16 ± 0.10
TyrosineNS 1.38 ± 0.07 1.20 ± 0.09 1.32 ± 0.02
Cysteine 13.24 ± 0.88B 13.49 ± 0.52B 15.17 ± 0.22A
Valine*NS 2.72 ± 0.39 3.04 ± 0.22 3.19 ± 0.08
Methionine*NS 2.05 ± 0.23 2.15 ± 0.16 2.35 ± 0.05
PhenylalanineNS 2.35 ± 0.17 2.10 ± 0.13 2.49 ± 0.05
Isoleucine*NS 1.89 ± 0.13 1.85 ± 0.11 2.00 ± 0.05
Leucine*NS 4.22 ± 0.15 3.98 ± 0.25 4.20 ± 0.10
Lysine*NS 4.92 ± 0.53 5.44 ± 0.99 5.84 ± 0.69
Proline 4.45 ± 0.27A 3.83 ± 0.26B 4.27 ± 0.08A
EAA 27.13 ± 0.15B 29.29 ± 1.35A 26.53 ± 0.61C
HAA 48.59 ± 0.61B 48.64 ± 0.48B 52.11 ± 0.08A
AAA 3.73 ± 0.07A 3.30 ± 0.03B 3.81 ± 0.02A
NCAA 15.80 ± 0.51AB 15.59 ± 0.39B 16.57 ± 0.10A
PCAA 25.13 ± 0.04A 25.24 ± 1.18A 20.52 ± 0.92B

Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among the mean value of each treatment (p < 0.05).

Essential AAs.

AA, amino acid; VD, vacuum dried tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate; VD-1, VD with a molecular weight cutoff < 5 kDa; VD-2, VD with a molecular weight cutoff range of 5 to 10 kDa; VD-3, VD with a molecular weight cutoff > 10 kDa; NS, not significant; TAA, total AAs; EAA, essential AAs; HAA, hydrophobic AAs; AAA, aromatic AAs; NCAA, negatively charged AAs (acidic AAs), PCAA, positively charged AAs (basic AAs).

Download Excel Table
Antioxidant properties of tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate fractions

The antioxidant properties of the TCH fractions were evaluated by DPPH radical scavenging activity, ABTS radical scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power, and ferrous ion chelating activity assays. VD-1 exhibited the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity among the fractions (0.89 µmol Trolox/mg protein), followed by VD-2 and VD-3, respectively (p < 0.05). In contrast, significant ABTS radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power were observed in VD-3 (29.74 and 1,511.1 µmol Trolox/mg protein, respectively), followed by VD-2 and VD-1, respectively (p < 0.05). Significant ferrous ion chelating activity was detected in VD-1 and VD-2 (0.0824 and 0.0829 µmol EDTA/mg protein, respectively) compared with VD-3 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3). These results suggested that molecular weight plays an important role in the antioxidant activities of peptides (Azemi et al., 2017). From the results, the DPPH radical scavenging activity and ferrous ion chelating activity showed a negative correlation with peptide size, whereas that of ABTS radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power showed a positive correlation with peptide size (Fig. 3). Our results were in agreement with the findings of several studies, wherein similar correlations between peptide size and several antioxidant activities were observed (He et al., 2013; Khositanon et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2010). However, some of our results revealed contradictory correlations between the peptide size and antioxidant activities (Zhao et al., 2011). From these findings, it could be inferred that other factors might be involved.

fas-25-6-335-g3
Fig. 3. Antioxidant activity of VD fractions. VD was fractionated by ultrafiltration using 5 and 10 kDa MWCO. VD-1, VD with MWCO < 5 kDa; VD-2, VD with MWCO 5 to 10; VD-3, VD with MWCO > 10 kDa. DPPH radical scavenging activity (A), ABTS radical scavenging activity (B), ferric reducing antioxidant activity (C), and ferrous ion chelating activity (D). All data were reported as mean ± SD (n = 3). Uppercase letters indicate significant difference among the mean value of each treatment group (p < 0.05). VD, vacuum-dried; TCH, tuna cooking juice concentrate hydrolysate; MWCO, molecular weight cutoff; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid.
Download Original Figure

In addition to peptide size, AA profiles may play an important role in the antioxidant activities of VD fractions. Some AA residues in peptides are known to have considerable free radical scavenging activity. The presence of glycine, glutamic acid, and alanine may have promoted peptide interactions with lipids and consequently improved the stability of free radicals (Zamorano-Apodaca et al., 2020). Proline can scavenge free radicals by acting as a hydrogen donor (Zou et al., 2016). Arginine enhances the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities of peptides (Yao et al., 2021). Cysteine and its disulfide molecule (cysteine/cysteine disulfide) affect the antioxidant capacity of peptides by inhibiting the formation of the DPPH complex. Cysteine and its radical can also scavenge ABTS•+, i.e., 1 molecule of cysteine reacts with 1.9 molecules of ABTS•+ (Kim et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2016). In addition, two phenylalanine and two histidine residues may potentially increase the antioxidant ability of peptides (Zou et al., 2016). Thus, all hydrolysates containing peptides that can react with the radicals and convert them to more stable products can terminate the radical chain reaction. In this study, cysteine, glycine, arginine, histidine, and proline were significantly different (p < 0.05) among fractions. Our results were consistent with the finding of Chaijan et al. (2021), who reported that a high content of these AAs enhanced the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity of peptides. However, significant DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities were observed from different fractions. VD-1 exhibited the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity, while VD-3 exhibited the highest ABTS radical scavenging activity. Based on our results, it is likely that not only the AA contents affected the free radical scavenging activity of the VD fraction. Other factors, such as AA sequences, the stereoselectivity of radicals, and the stoichiometry between radicals and antioxidants, may be associated with antioxidant activities (Borawska et al., 2015; Chaijan et al., 2021).

In this study, the sum of AAA (tyrosine and phenylalanine) and PCAA (histidine, arginine, and lysine) content was the highest in VD-1, followed by VD-2 and VD-3, respectively (28.76, 28.54, and 24.33 g/100 g protein, respectively). This resulted in the highest ferric reducing antioxidant power of VD-3 due to the negative correlation between AAA and PCAA on ferric reducing antioxidant power, which was consistent with the finding of Udenigwe & Aluko (2011). Furthermore, ferrous ion chelating activity depends not only on peptide size but also on the presence of specific peptide structures (Phongthai et al., 2018); the AA or carboxyl groups present in the NCAA (aspartic acid and glutamic acid) and PCAA side chain can chelate the transition metal ions by forming strong ionic interactions (Chuesiang & Sanguandeekul, 2015). Specifically, the presence of these AAs in the C-terminal end promotes the ferrous ion chelating activity of peptides (Zou et al., 2016). These data explained why VD-1 and VD-2, which had higher quantities of NCAA and PCAA contents, had higher ferrous ion chelating activities than that of VD-3 (p < 0.05). Similar findings were observed in the study by Chuesiang & Sanguandeekul (2015), in which an increase in the sum of these NCAA and PCAA increased the ferrous ion chelating activity of frame protein hydrolysate from tilapia (Oreochromis nilotica).

Overall, the results suggested that not only peptide size and AA profiles play important roles in the antioxidant activities of TCH fractions, but other factors may also be involved. Therefore, investigations associated with peptide structure would be advantageous for future studies to confirm the sequence and position of AAs in peptides, which may be correlated with various antioxidant activities.

Conclusion

RSM revealed that the optimal hydrolysis conditions for TCH production were 2.2% Alcalase and a hydrolysis time of 281 min; under these conditions, the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity (66.49%) was achieved. Among the drying methods, the vacuum process markedly increased the DPPH radical scavenging activity of TCH. After ultrafiltration, the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity and ferrous ion chelating activity were found in VD-1 (MWCO < 5 kDa). On the other hand, the strongest ABTS radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power were found in VD-3 (MWCO > 10 kDa). Therefore, TC could serve as a potential protein source of raw material in the production of TCH and has promising antioxidant activities for future application as a functional ingredient.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This research was funded by Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Alahmad K, Xia W, Jiang Q, Xu Y. Effect of the degree of hydrolysis on nutritional, functional, and morphological characteristics of protein hydrolysate produced from bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) using ficin enzyme. Foods. 2022; 11:1320

2.

Alemán A, Pérez-Santín E, Bordenave-Juchereau S, Arnaudin I, Gómez-Guillén MC, Montero P. Squid gelatin hydrolysates with antihypertensive, anticancer and antioxidant activity. Food Res Int. 2011; 44:1044-51

3.

Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International. 2000.

4.

Auwal SM, Zarei M, Abdul-Hamid A, Saari N. Response surface optimisation for the production of antioxidant hydrolysates from stone fish protein using bromelain. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017; 2017:4765463

5.

Azemi WAWM, Samsudin NA, Halim NRA, Sarbon NM. Bioactivity of enzymatically prepared eel (Monopterus sp.) protein hydrolysate at different molecular weights. Int Food Res J. 2017; 24:571-8.

6.

Bahari AN, Saari N, Salim N, Ashari SE. Response factorial design analysis on papain-generated hydrolysates from Actinopyga lecanora for determination of antioxidant and antityrosinase activities. Molecules. 2020; 25:2663

7.

Banjongsinsiri P, Pasakawee K, Noojuy N, Taksima T, Rodsuwan U. Production of mushroom protein hydrolysates by enzymatic hydrolysis and their physicochemical properties. Food Appl Biosci J. 2017; 4:161-70.

8.

Borawska J, Darewicz M, Vegarud GE, Iwaniak A, Minkiewicz P. Ex vivo digestion of carp muscle tissue – ACE inhibitory and antioxidant activities of the obtained hydrolysates. Food Funct. 2015; 6:211-8

9.

Chaijan M, Rodsamai T, Charoenlappanit S, Roytrakul S, Panya A, Phonsatta N, et al. Characterization of antioxidant peptides from Thai traditional semi-dried fermented catfish. Fermentation. 2021; 7:262

10.

Cheng ML, Wang HC, Hsu KC, Hwang JS. Anti-inflammatory peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of tuna cooking juice. Food Agric Immunol. 2015; 26:770-81

11.

Choudhary AK, Pramanik H. Optimization and validation of process parameters via RSM for minimizing use of resources to generate electricity from a DEFC. Int J Energy Res. 2021; 45:20413-29

12.

Chuesiang P, Sanguandeekul R. Protein hydrolysate from tilapia frame: antioxidant and angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor properties. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2015; 50:1436-44

13.

Ciou JY, Hsieh LS, Lee TT, Hsieh CW. Enhancement of agricultural processed by-products: qualities analysis of fermentation method in gradient salt adding treatment of tuna cooking juice with black bean koji added. Foods. 2020; 9:320

14.

Dabbour M, Sami R, Mintah BK, He R, Wahia H, Khojah E, et al. Effect of drying techniques on the physical, functional, and rheological attributes of isolated sunflower protein and its hydrolysate. Processes. 2022; 10:13

15.

Decker EA, Welch B. Role of ferritin as a lipid oxidation catalyst in muscle food. J Agric Food Chem. 1990; 38:674-7

16.

Dong S, Zeng M, Wang D, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Yang H. Antioxidant and biochemical properties of protein hydrolysates prepared from silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Food Chem. 2008; 107:1485-93

17.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]/World Health Organization [WHO]. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2007.

18.

Halim NRA, Sarbon NM. A response surface approach on hydrolysis condition of eel (Monopterus sp.) protein hydrolysate with antioxidant activity. Int Food Res J. 2017; 24:1081-93.

19.

He R, Girgih AT, Malomo SA, Ju X, Aluko RE. Antioxidant activities of enzymatic rapeseed protein hydrolysates and the membrane ultrafiltration fractions. J Funct Foods. 2013; 5:219-27

20.

Henriques A, Vázquez JA, Valcarcel J, Mendes R, Bandarra NM, Pires C. Characterization of protein hydrolysates from fish discards and by-products from the north-west Spain fishing fleet as potential sources of bioactive peptides. Mar Drugs. 2021; 19:338

21.

How YK, Siow LF. Effects of convection-, vacuum-and freeze-drying on antioxidant, physicochemical properties, functional properties and storage stability of stink bean (Parkia speciosa) powder. J Food Sci Technol. 2020; 57:4637-48

22.

Jakkranuhwat N, Kunchansombat P. Effect of foam-mat drying conditions on antioxidant activity, total phenolic compound, anthocyanin content and color of purple-fleshed sweet potato powder. Chiang Mai Univ J Nat Sci. 2021; 20e2021045

23.

Karimi A, Azizi MH, Ahmadi Gavlighi H. Fractionation of hydrolysate from corn germ protein by ultrafiltration: in vitro antidiabetic and antioxidant activity. Food Sci Nutr. 2020; 8:2395-405

24.

Kasiwut J, Youravong W, Adulyatham P, Sirinupong N. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory and Ca-binding activities of peptides prepared from tuna cooking juice and spleen proteases. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2015; 50:389-95

25.

Khositanon P, Panya N, Roytrakul S, Krobthong S, Chanroj S, Choksawangkarn W. Effects of fermentation periods on antioxidant and angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activities of peptides from fish sauce by-products. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2021; 135:110122

26.

Kim JH, Jang HJ, Cho WY, Yeon SJ, Lee CH. In vitro antioxidant actions of sulfur-containing amino acids. Arab J Chem. 2020; 13:1678-84

27.

Kumari M, Gupta SK. Response surface methodological (RSM) approach for optimizing the removal of trihalomethanes (THMs) and its precursor’s by surfactant modified magnetic nanoadsorbents (sMNP) - an endeavor to diminish probable cancer risk. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:18339

28.

Long W. Automated amino acid analysis using an Agilent Poroshell HPH-C18 column. Santa Clara, CA: Agilent Technologies. 2021Report No.: 5991-5571EN.

29.

Mahdavi-Yekta M, Nouri L, Azizi MH. The effects of hydrolysis condition on antioxidant activity of protein hydrolyzate from quinoa. Food Sci Nutr. 2019; 7:930-6

30.

Martínez-Montaño E, Osuna-Ruíz I, Benítez-García I, Osuna CO, Pacheco-Aguilar R, Navarro-Peraza RS, et al. Biochemical and antioxidant properties of recovered solids with pH shift from fishery effluents (sardine stickwater and tuna cooking water). Waste Biomass Valori. 2021; 12:1901-13

31.

Mongkonkamthorn N, Malila Y, Regenstein JM, Wangtueai S. Enzymatic hydrolysis optimization for preparation of tuna dark meat hydrolysate with antioxidant and angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities. J Aquat Food Prod Technol. 2021; 30:1090-108

32.

Narkprasom N, Narkprasom K, Upara U. Optimization of total phenolic from Cleistocalyx nervosum by microwave-assisted extraction. Am J Eng Appl Sci. 2015; 8:302-9

33.

Novozymes. Proteases for biocatalysis: for smarter chemical synthesis. Bagsvaerd, Denmark: Novozymes. 2016.

34.

Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reaction antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr Diet. 1986; 44:307-15

35.

Parvathy U, Nizam KM, Zynudheen AA, Ninan G, Panda SK, Ravishankar CN. Characterization of fish protein hydrolysate from red meat of Euthynnus affinis and its application as an antioxidant in iced sardine. J Sci Ind Res. 2018; 77:111-9.

36.

Peng S, Chen C, Shi Z, Wang L. Amino acid and fatty acid composition of the muscle tissue of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). J Food Nutr Res. 2013; 1:42-5.

37.

Phongthai S, D’Amico S, Schoenlechner R, Homthawornchoo W, Rawdkuen S. Fractionation and antioxidant properties of rice bran protein hydrolysates stimulated by in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2018; 240:156-64

38.

Prasertsan P, Wuttijumnong P, Sophanodon P. Seafood processing industries within Songkhla-Hat Yai region; the survey of basic data emphasis on wastes. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 1988; 10:447-51.

39.

Šumić Z, Vakula A, Tepić A, Čakarević J, Vitas J, Pavlić B. Modeling and optimization of red currants vacuum drying process by response surface methodology (RSM). Food Chem. 2016; 203:465-75

40.

Tacias-Pascacio VG, Morellon-Sterling R, Siar EH, Tavano O, Berenguer-Murcia Á. Fernandez-Lafuente R. Use of Alcalase in the production of bioactive peptides: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020; 165:2143-96

41.

Tang X, He Z, Dai Y, Xiong YL, Xie M, Chen J. Peptide fractionation and free radical scavenging activity of zein hydrolysate.. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58:587-93

42.

Tang WL, Zhang M, Adhikari B, Mujumdar AS. Effects of preparation and drying methods on the antioxidant activity of enzymatically hydrolyzed porcine placenta hydrolysates. Dry Technol. 2013; 31:1600-10

43.

Tapal A, Tiku PK. Nutritional and nutraceutical improvement by enzymatic modification of food proteins.In In: Kuddus M, editor.editor Enzymes in food biotechnology: production, applications, and future prospects. London, UK: Academic Press. 2019; p. 471-81

44.

Udenigwe CC, Aluko RE. Chemometric analysis of the amino acid requirements of antioxidant food protein hydrolysates. Int J Mol Sci. 2011; 12:3148-61

45.

Uribe E, Pardo-Orellana CM, Vega-Gálvez A, Ah-Hen KS, Pastén A, García V, et al. Effect of drying methods on bioactive compounds, nutritional, antioxidant, and antidiabetic potential of brown alga Durvillaea antarctica. Dry Technol. 2020; 38:1915-28

46.

Wahid Z, Nadir N. Improvement of one factor at a time through design of experiments. World Appl Sci J. 2013; 21:56-61.

47.

Wang X, Yu H, Xing R, Chen X, Liu S, Li P. Optimization of the extraction and stability of antioxidative peptides from Mackerel (Pneumatophorus japonicus) protein. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:6837285

48.

Wouters AGB, Rombouts I, Fierens E, Brijs K, Delcour JA. Relevance of the functional properties of enzymatic plant protein hydrolysates in food systems. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016; 15:786-800

49.

Yao H, Yang J, Zhan J, Lu Q, Su M, Jiang Y. Preparation, amino acid composition, and in vitro antioxidant activity of okra seed meal protein hydrolysates. Food Sci Nutr. 2021; 9:3059-70

50.

Yen GC, Hsieh PP. Antioxidative activity and scavenging effects on active oxygen of xylose-lysine maillard reaction products. J Sci Food Agric. 1995; 67:415-20

51.

Zamorano-Apodaca JC, García-Sifuentes CO, Carvajal-Millán E, Vallejo-Galland B, Scheuren-Acevedo SM, Lugo-Sánchez ME. Biological and functional properties of peptide fractions obtained from collagen hydrolysate derived from mixed by-products of different fish species. Food Chem. 2020; 331:127350

52.

Zhao L, Luo YG, Wang CT, Ji BP. Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates from aqueous extract of velvet antler (Cervus elaphus) as influenced by molecular weight and enzymes. Nat Prod Commun. 2011; 6:1683-8

53.

Zheng L, Zhao M, Xiao C, Zhao Q, Su G. Practical problems when using ABTS assay to assess the radical-scavenging activity of peptides: importance of controlling reaction pH and time. Food Chem. 2016; 192:288-94

54.

Zhuang Y, Zhao X, Li B. Optimization of antioxidant activity by response surface methodology in hydrolysates of jellyfish (Rhopilema esculentum) umbrella collagen. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009; 10:572-9

55.

Zou TB, He TP, Li HB, Tang HW, Xia EQ. The structure-activity relationship of the antioxidant peptides from natural proteins. Molecules. 2016; 21:72