Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science

α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition effects of Korean edible brown, green, and red seaweed extracts

Ju-Won Ryu1,#, Myeong Seok Lee2,#, Mi-Jin Yim2, Jeong Min Lee2, Dae-Sung Lee2, Young-Mog Kim3, Sung-Hwan Eom1,*
1Department of Food Science and Technology, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47303, Korea
2National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon 33662, Korea
3Department of Food Science and Technology, Pukyoung National University, Busan 48513, Korea
*Corresponding author: Sung-Hwan Eom, Department of Food Science and Technology, Dong-Eui University, Busan 47303, Korea, Tel: +82-51-890-1569, Fax: +82-505-182-6897,

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Dec 07, 2022; Revised: Dec 20, 2022; Accepted: Dec 20, 2022

Published Online: Mar 31, 2023


The control of intestinal α-amylase and α-glucosidase is an effective therapeutic strategy for prevention of post-prandial hyperglycemia associated with diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the anti-diabetes activities of Korean edible seaweed against α-amylase and α-glucosidase, two carbolytic enzymes involved in serum glucose regulation. Of the 41 species initially screened, Cladophora wrightiana var. minor, Eisenia bicyclis, Ecklonia cava, Ishige foliacea, and Ishige okamurae exhibited the strongest inhibitory activities from brown seaweeds. Asparagopsis taxiformis showed the strongest inhibitory effects from red seaweeds. The results of this study suggest that the crude brown seaweed extracts (C. wrightiana var. minor, E. bicyclis, E. cava, I. foliacea, and I. okamurae) and crude red seaweed extracts (A. taxiformis) may have beneficial effects suppressing the rise in postprandial hyperglycemia through the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase.

Keywords: α-amylase; α-glucosidase; Diabetes mellitus; Korean seaweeds


Seaweeds have been a dietary component and used as alternative medicine in East-asian countries such as China, Japan and Korea for several centuries. In Korea, seaweeds have been also used as a useful food resource for dry products, salt products, and condiments. Seaweed is classified into macroalgae and microalgae. Macroalgae are additionally divided into three main groups: Chlorophyceae (green algae), Rhodophyceae (red algae), and Phaeophyceae (brown algae) (Widyaswari et al., 2021). Seaweeds are known to contain a variety of biological substances with diverse health benefits (Rindi et al., 2012). Apart from the major components of seaweeds such as polysaccharides, protein, and fatty acids, they are also rich in bioactive compounds including polyphenols, peptides, sterols, flavonoids, alkaloids, and other bioactive compounds (Ahn et al., 2004; Athukorala et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2018). Especially, brown algae are known to contain bioactive compounds such as alginic acid, fucoidan, laminarin, sargassan, and to have anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-oxidant, anti-coagulant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer activities (Kim & Jung, 2019).

Diabetes mellitus is an endocrine metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels. The long-term complications of diabetes mellitus can cause some severe symptom such as cardiovascular, nephropathy, retinopathy, and poor blood flow. Diabetes is generally classified into 2 categories; Type 1 diabetes involves T-cell mediated autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta-cells that produce insulin, which do not usually produce enough insulin (Simmons & Michels, 2015). Fat, liver, and muscle do not respond to insulin in type 2 diabetes, which accounts for about 90% of diabetic cases (Fan et al., 2017). The number of people living with diabetes is currently growing in worldwide and its successful treatment is not fully to be discovered (Tabish, 2007). Until now, the most effective therapeutic approach for type 2 diabetes inhibits the carbohydrate hydrolyzing enzymes, such as α-amylase and α-glucosidase in the small intestine (Gong et al., 2020). The inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase can reduce the production of monosaccharides, thereby attenuating the rapid postprandial increase in blood glucose concentration. Although, acarbose and voglibose are widely used to treat against type 2 diabetes as commercialized inhibitors, they have commonly been reported to have side effects such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence (Fujisawa et al., 2005).

Therefore, there is a need to develop the stable, reliable and safe anti-diabetes agents from natural products. Since few innovative products derived from marine are commercially available, we tried to investigate the α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition effects of Korean edible seaweeds to find potential antidiabetic agents in this study.

Materials and Methods


α-amylase (EC, α-glucosidase (EC, and 4-Nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (p-NPG) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dinitrosalicylic acid was obtained from Fluka Chemicals (Madrid, Spain). Starch, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium potassium tartrate, and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) were obtained from Junsei Chemicals (Tokyo, Japan). Other chemicals and reagents were commercially available and of analytical grade.

Sample preparation

The samples (crude extracts of 41 seaweeds) used in this study were provided by Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (Seocheon, Korea). The seaweeds were collected on the coast of Korea from April 2011 to June 2016. All voucher specimen were deposited at the Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea. Briefly, each samples (41 seaweeds) were stored at –20°C after collection and lyophilized at –40°C (FDT-8650; Operon, Gimpo, Korea). After drying, the samples were grounded and stored at –20°C. Dried seaweeds were extracted three times for 1 hr each with 70% ethanol using ultrasonicator (WUC-N30H; Daihan Scientific, Seoul, Korea). Extracted samples were concentrated using a rotary evaporator (R-210; Buchi, Flawil, Switzerland) at 50°C and then the extracts were lyophilized. To obtain a stock solution of 100 mg/mL, powdered samples dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Junsei Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) and stored at –70°C until used.

Assay of α-amylase activity

The α-amylase inhibition assay was performed according to the method of Kim et al. (2004) with slight modifications. 10 µL of porcine pancreatic α-amylase (EC was incubated with sample at various concentrations. The reaction was started by adding 180 µL of 1.0% potato starch solution in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) to the reaction mixture. After incubation at 37.5°C for 15 min the reaction was stopped by addition of DNS (dinitro salicylic acid; 1% 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid, 12% sodium potassium tartrate in 0.4 mol/L NaOH) color reagent solution. The mixture was then boiled for 5 min in a water bath and chilled on ice. The α-amylase-inhibitory activity was measured at 540 nm using Versamax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, California, NJ, USA). The relative inhibition was calculated using the equation:

Relative inhibition ( % ) = [ 1 ( sample sample blank ) / ( control blank ) ] × 100

Acarbose was tested as a positive control.

Assay of α-glucosidase activity

The assay for α-glycosidase inhibition was conducted by using the slightly modified method (Eom et al., 2012). 1 µL of α-glucosidase (EC and 10 μL of each sample solution with different concentrations in 100 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) were incubated at 37.5°C for 30 min. Then added to 4 µL of 3 mM p-NPG (Sigma-Aldrich) as a substrate. After incubation at 37°C for 30 min, mixture was added to stop reaction 100 µL of 0.1 mol/L Na2CO3. Optical density at 492 nm was measured on Versamax microplate reader (Molecular Devices). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value was calculated via the following equation:

Relative inhibition ( % ) = [ 1 ( sample sample blank ) / ( control blank ) ] × 100

Acarbose was tested as a positive control.

Kinetic inhibition patterns on α-glucosidase

The inhibition kinetic study of extract on glucosidase was determined by using a Lineweaver-Burk plot which were calculated from the results according to the Michaelis-Menten kinetics at different concentrations of samples. The quantity of α-glucosidase was maintained at 1–10 μL of sample was measured with p-NPG as substrate.

Results and Discussion

Inhibition of α-amylase

The ethanolic extracts of brown, green and red seaweeds were evaluated for their α-amylase inhibitory activity compared with those of a commercial inhibitor, acarbose. The inhibitory effects on α-amylase of the brown, green, and red ethanolic extracts and acarbose are shown in Table 1. In twenty-four brown seaweeds, Ishige okamurae was the highest α-amylase inhibitory effect with IC50 value of 16.10 ± 1.01 μg/mL, followed by Ecklonia cava (30.85 ± 0.78 μg/mL), Ishige foliacea (33.68 ± 0.10 μg/mL), Desmarestia tabacoides (36.71 ± 2.91 μg/mL), Sargassum filicinum (120.69 ± 3.64 μg/mL), and Eisenia bicyclis (159.11 ± 28.79 μg/mL; Table 1). Comparing our findings with other studies showed that I. okamurae and E. cavaexhibited IC50 values of 0.30 μg/mL and 956 μg/mL (Kim, 2010; Kim et al., 2011).

Table 1. α-Glucosidase- and α-amylase-inhibitory effects of brown, green and red seaweeds extracts
Scientific name IC50 values for α-amylase inhibition1) IC50 values for α-glucosidase inhibition
Brown seaweeds
Agarum cribrosum > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Carpomitra costata > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Desmarestia tabacoides 36.71 ± 2.91 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Dictyopteris divaricata > 500 μg/mL 142.84 ± 50.33 μg/mL
Distromium decumbens > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Ecklonia cava 30.85 ± 0.78 μg/mL 0.87 ± 0.03 μg/mL
Eisenia bicyclis 159.11 ± 28.79 μg/mL 3.57 ± 0.16 μg/mL
Ishige foliacea 33.68 ± 0.10 μg/mL 2.51 ± 0.09 μg/mL
Ishige okamurae 16.10 ± 1.01 μg/mL 0.78 ± 0.02 μg/mL
Myagropsis myagroides > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Padina arborescens > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Padina crassa > 500 μg/mL 10.94 ± 0.70 μg/mL
Rugulopteryx okamurae > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Saccharina japonica > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Sargassum coreanum > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Sargassum filicinum 120.69 ± 3.64 μg/mL 2.96 ± 0.06 μg/mL
Sargassum fusiforme > 500 μg/mL 39.75 ± 3.13 μg/mL
Sargassum horneri > 500 μg/mL 9.36 ± 0.66 μg/mL
Sargassum macrocarpum > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Sargassum micracanthum > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Sargassum miyabeiYendo > 500 μg/mL 80.71 ± 3.22 μg/mL
Sargassum thunbergii > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Sargassum yendoiOkamura & Yamada > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Sporochnus radiciformis > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Green seaweeds
Cladophora japonica > 500 μg/mL 7.54 ± 0.43 μg/mL
Cladophora wrightianavar. minor > 500 μg/mL 0.22 ± 0.01 μg/mL
Caulerpa okamurae > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Codium fragile > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Ulva pertusa > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Red seaweeds
Acrosorium yendoi > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Asparagopsis taxiformis > 500 μg/mL 2.27 ± 0.12 μg/mL
Callophyllis japonica > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Chondracanthus tenellus > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Gracilaria textorii > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Gracilaria verrucosa > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Grateloupia angusta > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Grateloupia crispata > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Grateloupia elliptica > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Martensia bibarihi > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Meristotheca papulosa > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Plocamium telfairiae > 500 μg/mL > 500 μg/mL
Acarbose2) 0.59 ± 0.01 μmol/L 92.39 ± 0.70 μmol/L

Different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

IC50, inhibitory concentration 50%.

Positive control.

Download Excel Table

Agarum cribrosum, Carpomitra costata, Dictyopteris divaricata, Distromium decumbens, Myagropsis myagroides, Padina arborescens, Padina crassaYamada, Rugulopteryx okamura, Saccharina japonica, Sargassum coreanum, Sargassum fusiforme, Sargassum horneri, Sargassum macrocarpum, Sargassum micracanthum, Sargassum miyabei Yendo, Sargassum thunbergii, Sargassum yendoi Okamura & Yamada, and Sporochnus radiciformis had no significant effects (IC50 values > 500 μg/mL) on a-amylase inhibition. Comparing these results with a recent study that M. myagroides exhibited IC50 values in the range of 2,790–4,280 μg/mL, P. arborescens and S. fusiforme exhibited IC50 values of 230 μg/mL and 153.12 μg/mL (Park & Han, 2012; Pak et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2019). S. thunbergi showed α-amylase inhibition effect (66.29%) at 5 mg/mL (Lee, 2010). The results of other studies showed that the α-amylase inhibition activities are not significantly higher in brown seaweeds as compared with these of our results.

In five green seaweeds, Caulerpa okamurae, Cladophora japonica, Cladophora wrightiana var. minor, Codium fragile, and Ulva pertusa had no significant effects (IC50 values > 500 μg/mL) on a-amylase inhibition (Table 1). Although Lordan et al. (2013) reported C. fragile showed α-amylase inhibition effect at 10 mg/mL concentration, limited information are available on α-amylase inhibitions of Korean edible green seaweed.

Twelve red seaweeds such as Acrosorium yendoi, Asparagopsis taxiformis, Callophyllis japonica, Chondracanthus tenellus, Gracilaria textorii, Gracilaria verrucosa, Grateloupia angusta, Grateloupia crispata, Grateloupia elliptica, Martensia bibarihi, Meristotheca papulosa, and Plocamium telfairiae had no significant effects (IC50 values > 500 μg/mL) on α-amylase inhibition (Table 1). Like green seaweeds, few studies identified the α-amylase inhibitions of Korean edible green seaweed. Thus, further study is needed to investigate green and red seaweeds over IC50 value of 500 μg/mL to quantify a broader spectrum of seaweeds than previously reported. Acarbose showed the α-amylase (IC50 value : 0.59 ± 0.01 μmol/L) as internal standard. As a result, the α-amylase inhibition effect of brown seaweed were consistent with these of other studies which brown seaweeds showed the strongest α-amylase inhibition than green and red seaweeds (Mikami & Hosokawa, 2013; Zaharudin et al., 2019).

Inhibition of α-glucosidase

The inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase of the brown, green, and red ethanolic extracts and acarbose are shown in Table 1. In brown seaweeds, I. okamuraewas the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory effect with IC50 value of 0.78 ± 0.02 μg/mL, followed by E. cava (0.87 ± 0.03 μg/mL), I. foliacea (2.51 ± 0.09 μg/mL), S. filicinum (2.96 ± 0.06 μg/mL), E. bicycls (3.57 ± 0.16 μg/mL), S. horneri (9.36 ± 0.66 μg/mL), P. crassaYamada (10.94 ± 0.70 μg/mL), S. fusiforme (39.75 ± 3.13 μg/mL), S. miyabeiYendo (80.71 ± 3.22 μg/mL), and D. divaricata (142.84 ± 50.33 μg/mL). Comparing these results with a previous study showed that E. bicyclisand exhibited IC50 values of 0.46 ± 0.00 mg/mL and I.okamurae exhibited IC50 values in the range of 220–520 μg/mL (Eom et al., 2012; Ryu et al., 2018). A. cribrosum, C. costata, D. divaricata, D. decumbens, M. myagroides, P. arborescens, R. okamurae, S. japonica,S. coreanum, S. macrocarpum, S. micracanthum, S. thunbergii, S. yendoi Okamura & Yamada, S. radiciformis had no significant effects (IC50 values > 500 μg/mL) on a-glucosidase inhibition. However, recent studies show that P. arborescensand R. okamurae exhibited IC50 values of 260 μg/mL and 50.63 µg/mL (Jeong et al., 2012; Park & Han, 2012). Like these results, the α-glucosidase inhibition activities of the S. thunbergii was 97.97% at the 0.1 mg/mL concentration (Kim et al., 2015). In green seaweeds, C. wrightiana var. minor showed the strong inhibition with IC50 value of 0.22 ± 0.01 μg/mL against α-glucosidase, followed by C. ladophora japonica (7.54 ± 0.43 μg/mL). But C. okamurae, C. fragile, and U. pertusa had no significant effects (IC50 values > 500 μg/mL) on a-glucosidase inhibition among green seaweeds. In red seaweeds, A. yendoi, C. japonica, C. tenellus, G. textorii, G. verrucosa, G. angusta, G. crispata, G. elliptica, M. bibarihi, M. papulosa, and P. telfairiae had no significant effects (IC50 values > 500 μg/mL) on a-glucosidase. Therefore, brown (I. okamurae, E. cava, I. foliacea, S. filicinum, E. bicycls, S. horneri, P. crassa Yamada, S. fusiforme, S. miyabeiYendo, and D. divaricata1), green (C. wrightiana var. minor), and red (A. taxiformis) seaweeds can be good candidates as α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Recent studies founded that the total phenolic (TP) contents (marine-derived polyphenols) are known to be have significant correlations with anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-cancer, anti-coagulant, anti-diabetes, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant activities (Gómez-Guzmán et al., 2018; Lopes et al., 2017). Recently, TP contents of brown (range from 3.52 to 78.52 mg phloroglucinol equivalent (PGE)/g) and green (range from 2.40 to 51.87 mg PGE/g) seaweeds showed significantly higher TP content than tested red seaweeds (range from 3.24 to 33.22 mg PGE/g) (Ahmad et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2021). Therefore, the glucosidase inhibition activity of brown seaweeds may be precisely correlated with the TP contents.

Inhibition pattern on α-glucosidase

Since brown seaweed such as C. wrightiana var. minor, E. cava, and I. okamurae are the strongest α-glucosidase inhibition among brown, green and red seaweeds, the Lineweaver-Burk plot analyses of C. wrightiana var. minor, E. cava, and I. okamurae were carried out to determine the type of inhibition. As shown in Fig. 1. All tested brown seaweeds were identified as non-competitive inhibitors. Thus, C. wrightiana var. minor, E. cava, and I. okamurae may bind at α-glucosidase protein sites other than the active site and cannot interact with the substrate in the active site (Blat, 2010). Our findings are in agreement with the results of Park et al. (2018), who observed E. cava ethanol extract was identified as non-competitive against α-glucosidase and I. okamurae methanol extract also reported to have a non-competitive inhibition of α-glucosidase activity. However, the α-glucosidase inhibition activity of C. wrightianavar. minor via non-competitive inhibition, which has not been reported previously.

Fig. 1. Lineweaver–Burk plots of α-glucosidase activity in presence of Cladophora wrightiana var. minor (a), Ecklonia cava (b), and Ishige okamurae (c) (■, control; ●, 3 μg/mL) using p-NPG as enzyme substrate. Each value is presented as mean ± SE of three independent experiments.
Download Original Figure

In conclusion, the assessments of α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition activities showed that the IC50 values in 41 samples (brown, red, and green seaweeds). E. cava, I. foliacea, and I. okamurae had high α-amylase inhibitory activities with 30.85 ± 0.78 μg/mL, 33.68 ± 0.10 μg/mL, and 16.10 ± 1.01 μg/mL of IC50values. Also, E. cava, I. foliacea, and I. okamurae had high α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with0.87 ± 0.03 μg/mL, 2.51 ± 0.09 μg/mL, and 0.78 ± 0.02 μg/mL of IC50values. While green (C. japonica IC50 = 7.54 ± 0.43 μg/mL, C. wrightiana var. minor IC50 = 0.22 ± 0.01 μg/mL) and red (A. taxiformis IC50 = 2.27 ± 0.12 μg/mL) seaweed extracts were significant effective in inhibiting α-glucosidase, they did not have any effect on inhibition of α-amylase. A. taxiformis, C. japonica, C. wrightiana var. minor, E. cava, I. foliacea, and I. okamuraewere presumed to have anti-diabetes effects via inhibition on α-glucosidase among 41 seaweeds. In kinetic study, C. wrightiana var. minor, E. cava, and I. okamuraehave known as non-competitive inhibition patterns. Therefore, E. cava, I. foliacea, and I. okamurae can be good candidate as a α-glucosidase inhibitor.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea Research Program 2022M00500.


Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.



Ahn CB, Jeon YJ, Kang DS, Shin TS, Jung BM. Free radical scavenging activity of enzymatic extracts from a brown seaweed Scytosiphon lomentaria by electron spin resonance spectrometry. Food Res Int. 2004; 37:253-8


Ahmad F, Sulaiman MR, Saimon W, Yee CF, Matanjun P. Proximate compositions and total phenolic contents of selected edible seaweed from semporna, Sabah, Malaysia. Borneo Sci. 2012; 31:85-96.


Athukorala Y, Lee KW, Kim SK, Jeon YJ. Anticoagulant activity of marine green and brown algae collected from Jeju island in Korea. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98:1711-6


Blat Y. Non-competitive inhibition by active site binders. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2010; 75:535-40


Eom SH, Lee SH, Yoon NY, Jung WK, Jeon YJ, Kim SK, et al. α-Glucosidase- and α-amylase-inhibitory activities of phlorotannins from Eisenia bicyclis. J Sci Food Agric. 2012; 92:2084-90


Fan W. Epidemiology in diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 6:8-16


Fujisawa T, Ikegami H, Inoue K, Kawabata Y, Ogihara T. Effect of two α-glucosidase inhibitors, voglibose and acarbose, on postprandial hyperglycemia correlates with subjective abdominal symptoms. Metabolism. 2005; 54:387-90


Gómez-Guzmán M, Rodríguez-Nogales A, Algieri F, Gálvez J. Potential role of seaweed polyphenols in cardiovascular-associated disorders. Mar Drugs. 2018; 16:250


Gong L, Feng D, Wang T, Ren Y, Liu Y, Wang J. Inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase: potential linkage for whole cereal foods on prevention of hyperglycemia. Food Sci Nutr. 2020; 8:6320-37


Jeong SY, Qian ZJ, Jin YJ, Kim GO, Yun PY, Cho TO. Investigation of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of ethanolic extracts from 19 species of marine macroalgae in Korea. Nat Prod Sci. 2012; 18:130-6.


Kim DH, Jung JY, Kim KBWR, Lee CJ, Kwak JH, Kim MJ, et al. Effects of heat and pH treatments on α-amylase inhibitory activity of Ecklonia cava ethanol extract. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011; 44:791-5


Kim H. Utility technical development of algae origin ability anti-diabetes food that take advantage of small molecule processing technology. Seoul: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2010Report No.: 1545001252.


Kim JH, Kang HM, Lee SH, Lee JY, Park LY. Antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibition activity of seaweed extracts. Korean J Food Preserv. 2015; 22:290-6


Kim TH, Jung WK. R&D trends of brown algae as potential candidates in biomedical application. J Mar Biosci Biotechnol. 2019; 11:1-13.


Kim YM, Wang MH, Rhee HI. A novel α-glucosidase inhibitor from pine bark. Carbohydr Res. 2004; 339:715-7


Lee MS, Yim MJ, Lee JM, Lee DS, Kim MY, Eom SH. In vitro antimicrobial activities of edible seaweeds extracts against cutibacterium acnes. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2021; 54:111-7.


Lee SJ. Lipase and α-amylase inhibitory activity of Sargassum thunbergii extracts. M.S. thesis Busan: Pukyong National University. 2010.


Lopes G, Andrade PB, Valentão P. Phlorotannins: towards new pharmacological interventions for diabetes mellitus type 2. Molecules. 2017; 22:56


Lordan S, Smyth TJ, Soler-Vila A, Stanton C, Paul Ross R. The α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory effects of Irish seaweed extracts. Food Chem. 2013; 141:2170-6


Mikami K, Hosokawa M. Biosynthetic pathway and health benefits of fucoxanthin, an algae-specific xanthophyll in brown seaweeds. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14:13763-81


Pak WM, Kim KBWR, Kim MJ, Cho JY, Ahn DH. Inhibitory effect of hexane fraction from myagropsis myagroides on pancreatic α-amylase in vitro. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 25:328-33


Park MH, Han JS. Hypoglycemic effect of Padina arborescens extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2012; 17:239-44


Park SR, Kim JH, Jang HD, Yang SY, Kim YH. Inhibitory activity of minor phlorotannins from Ecklonia cava on α-glucosidase. Food Chem. 2018; :128-34


Rindi F, Soler-Vila A, Guiry MD. Taxonomy of marine macroalgae used as sources of bioactive compounds.In In: Hayes M, editor.editor Marine bioactive compounds. New York, NY: Springer. 2012; p p. 1-53


Ryu BM, Jiang Y, Kim HS, Hyun JM, Lim SB, Li Y, et al. Ishophloroglucin A, a novel phlorotannin for standardizing the anti-α-glucosidase activity of Ishige okamurae. Mar Drugs. 2018; 16:436


Simmons KM, Michels AW. Type 1 diabetes: a predictable disease. World J Diabetes. 2015; 6:380-90


Tabish SA. Is diabetes becoming the biggest epidemic of the twenty-first century?. Int J Health Sci. 2007; 1:V-VIII.


Wang L, Park YJ, Jeon YJ, Ryu BM. Bioactivities of the edible brown seaweed, Undaria pinnatifida: a review. Aquaculture. 2018; 495:873-80


Widyaswari SG, Metusalach , Kasmiati , Amir N. A review: bioactive compounds of macroalgae and their application as functional beverages. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021; 679:012002


Yang J, Liu C, Cai H, Dongyu G, Zhenni J, Guo X, et al. Identification and theoretical explanation of chemical composition against α-amylase in the n-hexane extract from Sargassum fusiforme. Algal Res. 2019; 43:101642


Zaharudin N, Staerk D, Dragsted LO. Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity by selected edible seaweeds and fucoxanthin. Food Chem. 2019; 270:481-6