Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of LED spectrum on the regulation of appetite-related hormones in the digestive tract of red seabream (Pagrus major)

Si-Chan Kim1https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9671-3982, Ji-Sung Moon1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5835-4571, Josel Cadangin1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2017-3032, Bo-Hyun Joo1https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3090-0778, Han-Sik Kim2https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0998-4110, Sang-Woo Hur3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-6000, Youn Hee Choi1,4,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-7893
1Department of Fisheries Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
2Gyeongsangnam-do Fisheries Resources Research Institute, Tongyeong 53080, Korea
3Aquafeed Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Pohang 37517, Korea
4Division of Fisheries Life Sciences, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
*Corresponding author: Youn Hee Choi, Department of Fisheries Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea, Tel: +82-51-629-5915, Fax: +82-51-629-5908, E-mail:unichoi@pknu.ac.kr

Copyright © 2025 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 23, 2024; Revised: Nov 26, 2024; Accepted: Dec 12, 2024

Published Online: May 31, 2025

Abstract

Light is an external factor that stimulates the neuroendocrine system through the hypothalamus and controls hormonal regulation in fish. Specifically, various light wavelength can influence feeding behavior and feed digestion by regulating the expression of key hormones that control appetite and digestive functions or processes. In this study, we compared how the hormone-producing endocrine cells, known to be important during feed regulation and feeding, reacted in response to different light emitting diode (LED) spectrum stimulation in red seabream (Pagrus major). Fish were subjected to different light treatments (replicated thrice), namely; red (660 nm), green (518 nm), blue (450 nm), and white (full spectrum), at a 12L:12D photoperiod in a cylindrical tank equipped with LED covers. After 12 weeks of light exposure, gastrointestinal tract samples were subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis to check the expression level of ghrelin (GHRL), neuropeptide Y (NPY), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and cholecystokinin (CCK), and H&E and alcian blue-periodic acid-schiff (AB-PAS) staining to check structural influence. The results showed that the blue group exhibited the fastest body growth, followed by green, white, and red (p < 0.05). FISH analysis showed a similar pattern for GHRL expressed in the stomach and NPY expressed in both the stomach and intestine. IHC analysis revealed that PP was strongly expressed in the red and white groups, while weakly expressed in the green and blue groups. There were no visible differences in the CCK signals among the experimental groups. Moreover, H-E staining results showed no discernable morphological differences in the muscle layer and villi length of the intestine (p > 0.05), but AB-PAS staining results revealed that the number of goblet cells was the least in the red group (p < 0.05). These results illustrated that the blue group exhibited fast growth due to increase feeding strategy controlled by gastrointestinal hormones whereas, least growth and reduction was observed in red group. Based on these findings, the potential use of blue wavelength light in red seabream aquaculture is emphasized.

Keywords: Red seabream (Pagrus major); Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Immunohistochemistry; Appetite hormone

Introduction

The regulation of feeding and energy metabolism in fish is an essential process for survival and development, allowing them to obtain necessary energy for growth, and maintenance of physiological functions. Moreover, feeding processes are influenced by external factors such as light, temperature, habitat, and salinity, as well as internal factors including developmental stage and genetic influences (Schreck & Tort, 2016; Volkoff & Rønnestad, 2020). In particular, light serves as an important external stimulus for the physiological activities of fish, stimulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which directly influences feeding behavior through increased secretion of appetite-related peptides (Canosa & Bertucci, 2023; Falcón et al., 2010).

Light emitting diodes (LEDs) have garnered attention in the aquaculture sector as lighting strategy due to their long lifespan and low energy consumption. LEDs can effectively emit light at specific wavelengths, making them widely utilized in studies inducing physiological changes in fish, leading to the development of aquaculture methods that enhance growth efficiency and stress reduction (Güller et al., 2020; Luchiari & Freire, 2009; Villamizar et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2024). However, studies investigating the impact of light spectra on the distribution of endocrine cells and growth in fish remain relatively scarce.

Feeding behavior in fish is regulated by various appetite-related hormones. Among these, ghrelin (GHRL) is an orexigenic hormone secreted from the stomach, primarily produced in the P/D1 (human) or X/A (rat and dog) equivalent cells of the gastric oxyntic mucosa (Date et al., 2000). GHRL secretion is stimulated by factors such as IGF-1 and leptin, promoting the release of growth hormone (Avau et al., 2013; Tannenbaum et al., 2003). Additionally, GHRL acts on the hypothalamus to stimulate appetite, decreasing after food intake (Cummings et al., 2001; Kojima et al., 1999; Tschöp et al., 2000). Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neurotransmitter primarily found in the brain, including peripheral tissues such as the hypothalamus, sympathetic ganglia, and gastrointestinal tract. Composed of 36 amino acids, NPY plays crucial regulatory roles in both the central and peripheral nervous systems, particularly in appetite regulation, energy balance, blood pressure, and gastrointestinal motility (Danger et al., 1990; Holzer et al., 2012). Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) is found in various vertebrates, including fish and mammals, and plays a critical role in regulating digestion and energy metabolism. It modulates the exocrine functions of the pancreas and is involved in appetite regulation and gastrointestinal motility (Zhu et al., 2023). Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a hormone secreted from the digestive tract that functions in inhibiting gastric secretion, regulating bile secretion, promoting digestive enzyme secretion, and appetite regulation (Gibbs et al., 1973; Rehfeld, 2017). In fish, CCK expression is known to decrease primarily during fasting periods, and its effects on various digestive processes are regulated by receptor activation (Furutani et al., 2013). Goblet cells are distributed in the mucosal epithelium of the digestive tract, where they secrete mucus to protect and lubricate the intestinal lining. Enteroendocrine cells, on the other hand, secrete hormones that regulate digestion and metabolism. These cells detect the components of ingested food and activate the gut-brain axis by releasing hormones such as CCK, NPY, and GHRL. Through this activation, they help regulate appetite, digestive enzyme secretion, and gastrointestinal motility (Dezfuli et al., 2017; Rombout, 1977).

Red seabream (Pagrus major) is a highly demanded species in East Asian countries; however, uncertainties in aquaculture have increased due to mortality from climate change and disease. While research on other areas such as temperature has been actively conducted (Biswas et al., 2006), studies focusing on light remain relatively insufficient. Therefore, this study compared the growth and regulation of appetite-related hormones in the digestive tract of red seabream under different LED spectra. This study would expand understanding of various light exposure to the digestive physiology and support aquaculture development of red seabream.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Pukyong National University and was conducted in strict compliance with animal welfare regulations (Approval Number: PKNUIACUC-2023-58).

Experimental tank setup

The rearing tanks were made from 350 L circular polypropylene tanks (40 × 40 × 90 cm) fitted with lids that housed LEDs emitting monochromatic light, effectively blocking incoming external light. LEDs were custom made to emit different light wavelengths-red (660 nm), green (518 nm), blue (450 nm), and white (full spectrum), allowing for the division of experimental groups (replicated thrice; Fig. 1; Kim et al., 2025). White-colored light served as a control treatment due to its high similarity to natural light. The LEDs were installed 50 cm above the water surface, programmed to turn on at 8 AM and off at 8 PM, establishing a photoperiod of 12L:12D, and brightness was set to 150 lux measured by a light meter (TES-1339, TES Electrical Electronic, Taipei, Taiwan).

fas-28-5-307-g1
Fig. 1. Spectral profiles of white (A, full spectrum), red (B, 660 nm), green (C, 518 nm), blue (D, 450 nm) Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) used in this experiment.
Download Original Figure
Rearing management and sample collection

The red seabream used in the experiment were supplied by the Gyeongnam Fisheries Resources Research Institute (Tongyeong, Korea) and transported to the facility of Institute of Fisheries Sciences, Pukyong National University (Busan, Korea). Fish underwent a two-week acclimatization period in a separate, no light treatment tanks before actual experiment commenced. Thereafter, 14 fish per tank (42 individuals per light treatment) were randomly distributed to tanks. The average weight of the red seabream used was 122.96 ± 19.12 g. Fish were fed a commercially formulated feed twice daily at 8:30 AM and 6:30 PM until apparent satiation, which was determined based on the lack of feeding response. The rearing water was supplied through a flow-through system and complete water exchange was conducted 18 times per day. Aeration was provided, and a temperature of 20.06 ± 0.29°C was maintained using heated seawater (NIFS, 2020). Fish were subjected to body measurements and collection of gastrointestinal samples. Fish were anaesthetized with 2-phenoxyethanol (100 ppm), and the total length (cm), standard length (cm), body height (cm), body width (mm) were measured using a vernier caliper (CD-20APX, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan). The weight of the liver, viscera and gonad were subsequently measured in an electronic scale (AJ-4200E-D, Shinko, Nagano, Japan). Consequently, using sterile dissecting tools, liver, stomach, and intestine were separated from the body, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until analysis. Samples intended for histological analysis were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis

For fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of NPY and GHRL, stomach and intestinal tissues were analyzed from five fish per experimental group. The fixed tissues were made into paraffin blocks and sectioned at 5 μm thickness, which were then mounted onto glass slides. Probes for NPY (5’- TTGTGGCGTAAGTCAACC -3’; GeneBank#: LC314445.1) and GHRL (5’- AACTTGGTGAGCTGGCTG -3’; GeneBank#: LC155430.1) were added and incubated overnight at 55°C. The slides were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline with Diethyl pyrocarbonate treated water and intensity of expression was observed within 2 min exposure time for all samples using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis

For IHC analysis of PP and CCK, liver and intestinal tissues were collected from five fish per experimental group. The fixed tissues were made into paraffin blocks and sectioned at a thickness of 8 μm, which were then mounted on lysine-coated poly-prep slides (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Immunostaining was performed according to the protocol of the VECTASTAIN ABC Kit (Vector Lab, Newark, CA, USA), with CCK antibody (Santa Cruz, TX, USA) and PP antibody (Santa Cruz, SC, USA) diluted 1:500 in bovine serum albumin blocking buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C. The sections were subsequently developed using the DAB Substrate Kit (Vector Lab) and observed and photographed with an OLYMPUS SEX41 (Olympus).

Histological analysis by hematoxylin & eosin staining and alcian blue/periodic acid-schiff staining

For histological analysis, liver, stomach, and intestinal tissues were collected from ten fish per experimental group. The fixed tissues were made into paraffin blocks and sectioned at a thickness of 8 μm, which were then mounted on slides. The histological structures were confirmed using hematoxylin (Dako Products, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and eosin (Sigma-Aldrich) for staining. Alcian blue-periodic acid-schiff (AB-PAS) staining was performed to assess the development of goblet cells. The prepared slides were observed and photographed using an OLYMPUS SEX41 (Olympus). The number of goblet cells was measured in a randomly selected area of 1,000 μm² using Michrome 6 (Tucsen, Fuzhou, China) and Mosaic 2.1 (Tucsen).

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were analyzed in SPSS ver. 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) after passing normality and homogeneity assumptions. Significant difference was set at p < 0.05, and post-hoc test was done using Duncan’s multiple range test. Results are shown as mean ± SE.

Results

Growth performance

The effect of different LED spectrum on the growth performance of red seabream is shown in Table 1. Body weight and length morphometries (total length, standard length, body height, body width) were statistically affected by LED light treatments (p < 0.05). Fastest growth was observed in blue followed by green and white light treatments. Red light induced the slowest growth among light treatments. However, liver weight, visceral weight, and gonad weight was not statistically influenced by any LED treatments (p > 0.05).

Table 1. Body growth of red seabream (Pagrus major) reared under different LEDs for 12 weeks
Spectrum Weight (g) Total length (cm) Body length (cm) Body height (cm) Body width (mm) Liver weight (g) Viscera weight (g) Gonad weight (g)
Initial 122.96 ± 19.12 19.47 ± 1.1 16.07 ± 0.97 6.68 ± 0.38 23.48 ± 1.52 2.38 ± 0.46 4.38 ± 0.85 0.16 ± 0.11
White 297.11 ± 49.77ab 24.83 ± 1.42ab 21.3 ± 1.14ab 8.32 ± 0.57b 33.15 ± 2.83ab 4.56 ± 1.08ns 17.76 ± 4.59ns 0.97 ± 0.48ns
Red 264.37 ± 43.67b 23.96 ± 1.17b 20.47 ± 1.03b 8.05 ± 0.38b 31.52 ± 2.47b 4.18 ± 1.28 14.63 ± 3.81 0.84 ± 0.54
Green 308.01 ± 51.99ab 25.41 ± 1.24a 21.52 ± 1.3ab 8.89 ± 0.65a 33.44 ± 2.48ab 4.52 ± 1.23 18.38 ± 4.36 1.18 ± 0.65
Blue 330.15 ± 61.04a 25.87 ± 1.28a 21.85 ± 1.41a 8.91 ± 0.66a 34.9 ± 2.93a 5.39 ± 2.14 19.47 ± 6.93 1.19 ± 0.5

Values are the mean ± standard error of three replicates (n = 30).

Values with different superscript letters within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).

no significant difference (p > 0.05).

Download Excel Table
Detection of ghrelin (GHRL) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) expression by FISH

The expression of GHRL in the stomach and NPY in the stomach and intestine was observed following FISH analysis, and the results are shown in Fig. 2. Expression of GHRL was confirmed in the stomach of red seabream; wherein, fluorescence was most abundantly observed in the blue light treatment among other treatments, indicating high GHRL expression. In contrast, red light treatment induced a sparse fluorescence, demonstrating low GHRL expression. On the other hand, NPY expression was similarly detected in the stomach and intestine, and fluorescence was influenced by the different light treatments (Fig. 2). Most abundant fluorescence in both tissues was observed in the blue light, followed by green, white and red light treatments. Similar with GHRL expression, NPY expression was the highest in blue and lowest in red light.

fas-28-5-307-g2
Fig. 2. Expression of ghrelin and neuropeptide Y in the stomach and intestine of red seabream (Pagrus major) exposed to different light spectrum for 12 weeks as visualized by Flourescence in situ hybridization. (A) Initial stomach, ghrelin (GHRL); (B) White light stomach, GHRL; (C) Red light stomach, GHRL; (D) Green light stomach, GHRL; (E) Blue light stomach, GHRL; (F) Initial stomach, Neuropeptide Y (NPY); (G) White light stomach, NPY; (H) Red light stomach, NPY; (I) Green light stomach, NPY; (J) Blue light stomach, NPY; (K) Initial intestine, NPY; (L) White light intestine, NPY; (M) Red light intestine, NPY; (N) Green light intestine, NPY; (O) Blue light intestine, NPY. Main image magnification, ×200 (scale bar = 50 μm).
Download Original Figure
Detection of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and cholecystokinin (CCK) by IHC

Detection of PP in the liver and CCK in the intestine was done following IHC method, and the results are shown in Fig. 3. Positive-stained PP cells were brightly-stained in the red and white experimental groups compared at the start of the study, in contrast to blue and green experimental groups wherein lighter staining was observed. On the other hand, positive signal of CCK was observed in the intestine of red seabream either as a brown-colored spindle-shaped or spherical shaped cells along the columnar epithelium of the intestinal tissue. While signal intensity was higher at the end of the culture period compared to the initial, no visually apparent difference on the structure and signal intensity were observed in the CCK-stained cells in all light treatments.

fas-28-5-307-g3
Fig. 3. Expression of pancreatic polypeptide and cholecystokenin in the liver and intestine of red seabream (Pagrus major) exposed to different spectrum for 12 weeks as visualized by immunohistochemistry. (A) initial liver, pancreatic polypeptide (PP); (B) Full spectrum liver, PP; (C) Red light liver, PP; (D) Green light liver, PP; (E) Blue light liver, PP; (F) initial intestine, cholecystokinin (CCK); (G) Full spectrum intestine, CCK; (H) Red light intestine, CCK; (I) Green light intestine, CCK; (J) Blue light intestine, CCK. (A–E): The pancreas, hepatocytes, and zymogen granules (black arrowhead) are shown; (F–J): the CCK-secreting cells (black arrowhead) are shown. Main image magnification, ×400 (scale bar = 50 μm); inset image magnification, ×100 (scale bar = 200 μm). IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Download Original Figure
Comparison of histological morphometry by H&E and alcian blue-periodic acid-schiff (AB-PAS) staining

The histological analysis results of the liver, stomach, and intestine of red seabream following exposure to different LED spectra are presented in Fig. 4. In the liver tissues. The arrangement of hepatocytes and the development of the pancreas were denser compared to the start of the experiment (initial), but similar morphological structure was observed in all experimental groups. The distribution of pancreatic enzyme granules was also observed to be similar among the experimental groups (Fig. 4A–4E). In the stomach tissues, development of the muscle layer and submucosa was observed compared to the initial group; however, there were no describable morphological differences in the muscle layer, submucosa, and gastric glands among the experimental groups (Fig. 4F–4J). On the other hand, morphological arrangement of the intestinal villi was observed to be similar among experimental groups including at the start of the study (Fig. 4K–4O). Likewise, villi length and thickness of the muscle layer was not significantly affected by different light spectral experimental groups (p > 0.05, Table 2). The number of goblet cells per unit area was significantly lower in the Red experimental group (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were found in the Blue, Green, and White experimental groups (p > 0.05, Table 2).

fas-28-5-307-g4
Fig. 4. Histological structure of the liver, stomach and intestine of red seabream (Pagrus major) exposed to different light spectrum for 12 weeks as visualized by H&E staining and alcian blue-periodic acid-schiff (AB-PAS) staining. (A) initial liver, H-E staining; (B) Full spectrum liver, H-E staining; (C) Red light liver, H-E staining; (D) Green light liver, H-E staining; (E) Blue light liver, H-E staining; (F) initial stomach, H-E staining; (G) Full spectrum stomach, H-E staining; (H) Red light stomach, H-E staining; (I) Green light stomach, H-E staining; (J) Blue light stomach, H-E staining; (K) initial intestine, H-E staining; (L) Full spectrum intestine, H-E staining; (N) Red light intestine, H-E staining; (M) Green light intestine, H-E staining; (O) Blue light intestine, H-E staining; (P) initial intestine, AB-PAS; (Q) Full spectrum intestine, AB-PAS; (R) Red light intestine, AB-PAS; (S) Green light intestine, AB-PAS; (T) Blue light intestine, AB-PAS. (A–E): The hepatic portal vein (PV), pancreas (P), hepatocytes (H), and zymogen granules (black arrowhead) are shown; (F–J): the internal muscular layer (I) submucosa and gastric gland (G); (K–O): the internal muscular layer (I), mucosal fold (M); (P–T): the goblet cells (black arrowhead) are shown. Main image magnification, ×100 (scale bar = 200 μm); inset image magnification, ×40 (scale bar = 1,000 μm).
Download Original Figure
Table 2. Villus length, muscular thickness, and goblet cell count in the intestine of red seabream (Pagrus major)
Intestine (n = 10) 0 week 12 weeks
Initial White Red Green Blue
Villus length (μm) 1,317.07 ± 55.48 1,804.88 ± 119.35ns 1,748.25 ± 76.31 1,959.08 ± 132.48 1,969.74 ± 91.65
Muscular thickness (μm) 133.34 ± 9.42 206.37 ± 11.64ns 199.6 ± 22.55 211.5 ± 7.09 218.09 ± 15.2
Goblet cell (cells / 1,000 μm²) 146.9 ± 13.09 182.5 ± 63.52ab 157.5 ± 29.88b 201.3 ± 42.97ab 215.1 ± 27.24a

Values are the mean ± SE (n = 10) of three replicates.

Values with different superscript letters within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).

no significant difference (p > 0.05).

Download Excel Table

Discussion

The distribution of neuropeptides aligns with the digestive physiology and feeding habits of fish species (Barrios et al., 2020). Regulation of appetite and digestive process are influenced by environmental factors such as exposure to different light wavelengths through positive or negative stimulation of various neuro- and gastro-endocrinological hormones (Motoike et al., 2016) and can affect growth performance of fish species. GHRL detects fasting conditions in the digestive system and sends signals to the hypothalamus to stimulate appetite and induce food intake. GHRL is primarily secreted from the stomach, but in some fish species that lack a stomach, secretion is from the intestine. Additionally, other tissues such as the pituitary gland, hypothalamus, pancreas, heart, thyroid, kidneys, liver, and immune system also produce GHRL, albeit in small amounts (Hosoda et al., 2000). The gut-brain axis is a bidirectional signaling system between the digestive tract and the central nervous system, particularly the hypothalamus. It regulates appetite, energy metabolism, gastrointestinal motility, and immune responses through hormones, neurotransmitters, and immune signals. Key components of the gut-brain axis include gastrointestinal endocrine cells, the vagus nerve, and gut microbiota, which detect signals from food and relay them to the central nervous system. Among neurogastroendocrine hormones, GHRL and NPY play significant roles in this signaling process, mediating appetite stimulation and energy metabolism regulation. GHRL is predominantly secreted during fasting, stimulating hypothalamic neurons to promote NPY secretion, which subsequently induces food intake (Blanco et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023). The cells that produce GHRL in the stomach account for 20% of the endocrine cell population, and the distribution decreases from the stomach towards the intestine (Date et al., 2000). On the other hand, NPY is secreted from the arcuate nucleus in the hypothalamus and acts as a potent appetite stimulant, interacting with other hormones in the hypothalamus and being expressed through the gut-brain axis (Holzer et al., 2012). In the peripheral nervous system of the digestive tract, NPY regulates autonomic nervous system responses, such as vasoconstriction, and plays roles in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility and secretion (Rindi et al., 2004; Unniappan & Peter, 2005). The FISH results of this study indicated that both GHRL secreted from the stomach and NPY secreted from the stomach and intestine exhibited differential expression in the order of blue, green, white, and red experimental groups. This suggests that blue light contributes to the activation of the HPA axis, inducing differential gene expression as growth progresses (Dempsey et al., 1943). Moreover, since green light has a weaker effect on regulating the biological clock compared to blue light, the increase in the expression of GHRL and NPY was confirmed to be less than that of blue light. White light contains various wavelengths and may show a mixed effect of blue and green light; however, it does not provide strong stimulation due to specific wavelengths, leading to a moderate increase in the expression of GHRL and NPY. Red light, being a longer wavelength that contrasts with blue light, has minimal effects on the biological clock of red seabream, thereby minimizing its impact on the expression of GHRL and NPY, which explains low expression. Furthermore, results of the current study concur with the growth of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) under different LED spectra (Karakatsouli et al., 2008). Thus, the continuous exposure of red seabream to blue light induces appetite the most in contrast to other wavelength exposures tested by regulating GHRL and NPY hormone expression. The increase in appetite (implying increase feed consumption) correlates to the increase in the growth performance of red seabream in blue light and the contrary in the red experimental group.

PP is exclusively expressed in the endocrine cells of the digestive system and regulates exocrine pancreatic function, inhibiting digestive enzyme secretion and intestinal motility, which induces satiety through its action on the hypothalamus in the central nervous system (Browning & Travagli, 2014; Katsuura et al., 2002; Williams, 2014). PP secretion is stimulated by food intake and amount is dependent on the digestive state of the animal (Jesudason et al., 2007). In the present study, IHC results showed that PP staining was darker in the red and white experimental groups compared to the green and blue experimental groups. While food intake stimulates PP secretion, overexpression of PP can also result to food intake suppression due to the delay of gastric emptying (Asakawa et al., 2003). This suggest that white and red LED light might have suppressed gastric emptying time causing continuous expression of PP in the pancreas of red seabream. However, we deemed that the exact role of LED and mechanism needs further investigations. Meanwhile, CCK is released into the bloodstream from the intestine and acts on the hypothalamus in the brain to induce appetite suppression and satiety; however, the expression of CCK did not show significant differences among LED spectrum exposure. This suggests that the effect of various LED exposure in the satiation of the red seabream was through PP regulation and not through CCK, and among light wavelengths, blue and green light induced reduction in PP secretion in the liver of red seabream.

In contrast to the observed differences in the body growth and expression of gastrointestinal hormones, the morphological structure of the liver, stomach and intestine was not affected following exposure to various LED wavelength in red seabream. An exception is the significantly lower distribution of goblet cells in the intestine observed in the red experimental group. Goblet cells are distributed in the mucosal epithelium, secreting mucus to protect cells and increase intestinal motility and digestive activity, thus promoting digestion and absorption capabilities (Willora et al., 2022). The number of goblet cells serves as an indicator to assess the health status of the intestine and associated histological changes (Leduc et al., 2018). The reduction in these goblet cells in the red experimental group suggests less efficient nutrient absorption and is believed to have impacted growth performance along with the decrease in appetite-related genes in the red experimental group.

LED exposure of red seabream impacted the fish appetite through regulation of various hormones without major morphological influence in the anatomy of different digestive organs. Specifically, blue light induced appetite through increased expression of GHRL and NPY and reduced PP-secretion in the liver which concur with its fast growth of the fish. This scenario was observed less or in contrary in the other LED experimental groups. Overall, the current study emphasized the possible usage of blue LED as lighting strategy to increase the appetite and growth of red seabream with potential application in an aquaculture setting.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by a Research Grant of Pukyong National University (2023).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon a reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in strict accordance with the animal welfare regulations approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Pukyong National University, Republic of Korea (approval number: PKNUIACUC-2023-58).

References

1.

Asakawa A, Inui A, Yuzuriha H, Ueno N, Katsuura G, Fujimiya M, et al. Characterization of the effects of pancreatic polypeptide in the regulation of energy balance. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124:1325-36

2.

Avau B, Carbone F, Tack J, Depoortere I. Ghrelin signaling in the gut, its physiological properties, and therapeutic potential. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25:720-32

3.

Barrios CE, Santinón JJ, Domitrovic HA, Sánchez S, Hernández DR. Localization and distribution of CCK-8, NPY, Leu-ENK-, and Ghrelin- in the digestive tract of Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1836). An Acad Bras Ciênc. 2020; 92e20181165

4.

Biswas AK, Seoka M, Takii K, Maita M, Kumai H. Stress response of red sea bream Pagrus major to acute handling and chronic photoperiod manipulation. Aquaculture. 2006; 252:566-72

5.

Blanco AM, Calo J, Soengas JL. The gut–brain axis in vertebrates: implications for food intake regulation. J Exp Biol. 2021; 224:jeb231571

6.

Browning KN, Travagli RA. Central nervous system control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion and modulation of gastrointestinal functions. Compr Physiol. 2014; 4:1339-68

7.

Canosa LF, Bertucci JI. The effect of environmental stressors on growth in fish and its endocrine control. Front Endocrinol. 2023; 14:1109461

8.

Cummings DE, Purnell JQ, Frayo RS, Schmidova K, Wisse BE, Weigle DS. A preprandial rise in plasma ghrelin levels suggests a role in meal initiation in humans. Diabetes. 2001; 50:1714-9

9.

Danger JM, Tonon MC, Jenks BG, Saint-Pierre S, Martel JC, Fasolo A, et al. Neuropeptide Y: localization in the central nervous system and neuroendocrine functions. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1990; 4:307-40

10.

Date Y, Kojima M, Hosoda H, Sawaguchi A, Mondal MS, Suganuma T, et al. Ghrelin, a novel growth hormone-releasing acylated peptide, is synthesized in a distinct endocrine cell type in the gastrointestinal tracts of rats and humans. Endocrinology. 2000; 141:4255-61

11.

Dempsey EW, Searles HF. Environmental modification of certain endocrine phenomena. Endocrinology. 1943; 32:119-28

12.

Dezfuli BS, DePasquale JA, Castaldelli G, Giari L, Bosi G. A fish model for the study of the relationship between neuroendocrine and immune cells in the intestinal epithelium: Silurus glanis infected with a tapeworm. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017; 64:243-50

13.

Falcón J, Migaud H, Muñoz-Cueto JA, Carrillo M. Current knowledge on the melatonin system in teleost fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010; 165:469-82

14.

Furutani N, Hondo M, Kageyama H, Tsujino N, Mieda M, Yanagisawa M, et al. Neurotensin co-expressed in orexin-producing neurons in the lateral hypothalamus plays an important role in regulation of sleep/wakefulness states. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8e62391

15.

Gibbs J, Young RC, Smith GP. Cholecystokinin decreases food intake in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973; 84:488-95

16.

Güller U, Önalan Ş, Arabacı M, Karataş B, Yaşar M, Küfrevioğlu Öİ. Effects of different LED light spectra on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): in vivo evaluation of the antioxidant status. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2020; 46:2169-80

17.

Holzer P, Reichmann F, Farzi A. Neuropeptide Y, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide in the gut–brain axis. Neuropeptides. 2012; 46:261-74

18.

Hosoda H, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin: two major forms of rat ghrelin peptide in gastrointestinal tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 279:909-13

19.

Jesudason DR, Monteiro MP, McGowan BMC, Neary NM, Park AJ, Philippou E, et al. Low-dose pancreatic polypeptide inhibits food intake in man. Br J Nutr. 2007; 97:426-9

20.

Karakatsouli N, Papoutsoglou SE, Panopoulos G, Papoutsoglou ES, Chadio S, Kalogiannis D. Effects of light spectrum on growth and stress response of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss reared under recirculating system conditions. Aquac Eng. 2008; 38:36-42

21.

Katsuura G, Asakawa A, Inui A. Roles of pancreatic polypeptide in regulation of food intake. Peptides. 2002; 23:323-9

22.

Kim SC, Moon JS, Cadangin J, Lee ES, Joo BH, Kim HS, et al. Effect of LED spectrum on the vision, appetite, and growth of red seabream (Pagrus major). Aquaculture. 2025; 596:741889

23.

Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 1999; 402:656-60

24.

Leduc A, Zatylny-Gaudin C, Robert M, Corre E, Corguille GL, Castel H, et al. Dietary aquaculture by-product hydrolysates: impact on the transcriptomic response of the intestinal mucosa of European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed low fish meal diets. BMC Genom. 2018; 19:396

25.

Li S, Liu M, Cao S, Liu B, Li D, Wang Z, et al. The mechanism of the gut-brain axis in regulating food intake. Nutrients. 2023; 15:3728

26.

Luchiari AC, Freire FAM. Effects of environmental colour on growth of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), maintained individually or in groups. J Appl Ichthyol. 2009; 25:162-7

27.

Motoike T, Long JM, Tanaka H, Sinton CM, Skach A, Williams SC, et al. Mesolimbic neuropeptide W coordinates stress responses under novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113:6023-8

28.

National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS). Technical manual for sea bream aquaculture. Busan: NIFS. 2020.

29.

Rehfeld JF. Cholecystokinin—from local gut hormone to ubiquitous messenger. Front Endocrinol. 2017; 8:47

30.

Rindi G, Leiter AB, Kopin AS, Bordi C, Solcia E. The “normal” endocrine cell of the gut: changing concepts and new evidences. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004; 1014:1-12

31.

Rombout JHWM. Enteroendocrine cells in the digestive tract of Barbus conchonius (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Cell Tissue Res. 1977; 185:435-50

32.

Schreck CB, Tort L. The concept of stress in fish. Fish Physiol. 2016; 35:1-34

33.

Tannenbaum GS, Epelbaum J, Bowers CY. Interrelationship between the novel peptide ghrelin and somatostatin/growth hormone-releasing hormone in regulation of pulsatile growth hormone secretion. Endocrinology. 2003; 144:967-74

34.

Tschöp M, Smiley DL, Heiman ML. Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature. 2000; 407:908-13

35.

Unniappan S, Peter RE. Structure, distribution and physiological functions of ghrelin in fish. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2005; 140:396-408

36.

Villamizar N, Blanco-Vives B, Migaud H, Davie A, Carboni S, Sánchez-Vázquez FJ. Effects of light during early larval development of some aquacultured teleosts: a review. Aquaculture. 2011; 315:86-94

37.

Volkoff H, Rønnestad I. Effects of temperature on feeding and digestive processes in fish. Temperature. 2020; 7:307-20

38.

Williams JA. Pancreatic polypeptide [Internet]. PANCREAPEDIA: exocrine pancreas knowledge base 2014.[cited 2024 Oct 26]https://pancreapedia.org/molecules/pancreatic-polypeptide.

39.

Willora FP, Vatsos IN, Mallioris P, Bordignon F, Keizer S, Martınez-Llorens S, et al. Replacement of fishmeal with plant protein in the diets of juvenile lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus, L. 1758): effects on digestive enzymes and microscopic structure of the digestive tract. Aquaculture. 2022; 561:738601

40.

Zheng JL, Gao L, Zhang HT, Chen X, Zhu QL, Han T. LED light spectra differently affected growth, antioxidant capacity, stress response, GH/IGF and HPI axis in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) larvae. Aquaculture. 2024; 578:740019

41.

Zhu W, Tanday N, Flatt PR, Irwin N. Pancreatic polypeptide revisited: potential therapeutic effects in obesity-diabetes. Peptides. 2023; 160:170923