Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cholinesterase inhibitory activities of neuroprotective fraction derived from red alga Gracilaria manilaensis

Jun-Rui Pang1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-9758, Sher-Wei How2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-1644, Kah-Hui Wong3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8292-4498, Siew-Huah Lim4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-1307, Siew-Moi Phang5,6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-2432, Yoon-Yen Yow1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-2094
1Department of Biological Sciences, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, 47500 Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
2Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, The University of Auckland, Aukland CBD, Aukland 1010, New Zealand
3Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
5Faculty of Applied Sciences, UCSI University, Cheras 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
6Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*Corresponding author: Yoon-Yen Yow, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, 47500 Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Tel: +603-7491-8622, E-mail: yoonyeny@sunway.edu.my

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 06, 2021; Revised: Nov 22, 2021; Accepted: Dec 12, 2021

Published Online: Feb 28, 2022

Abstract

Anti-cholinesterase (ChE)s are commonly prescribed as the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. They are applied to prevent the breakdown of neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) that bind to muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in the synaptic cleft. Seaweeds are one of the richest sources of bioactive compounds for both nutraceuticals and pharmacognosy applications. This study aimed to determine the anti-ChEs activity of Gracilaria manilaensis, one of the red seaweeds notables for its economic importance as food and raw materials for agar production. Methanol extracts (GMM) of G. manilaensis were prepared through maceration, and further purified with column chromatography into a semi-pure fraction. Ellman assay was carried out to determine the anti-acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and anti-butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) activities of extracts and fractions. Lineweaver-Burk plot analysis was carried out to determine the inhibition kinetic of potent extract and fraction. Major compound(s) from the most potent fraction was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS). GMM and fraction G (GMMG) showed significant inhibitory activity AChE with EC50 of 2.6 mg/mL and 2.3 mg/mL respectively. GMM and GMMG exhibit mixed-inhibition and uncompetitive inhibition respectively against AChE. GMMG possesses neuroprotective compounds such as cynerine A, graveolinine, militarinone A, eplerenone and curumenol. These findings showed a promising insight of G. manilaensis to be served as a nutraceutical for neuronal health care in the future.

Keywords: Gracilaria manilaensis; Alzheimer’s disease; Graveolinine; Mixed-inhibition; Uncompetitive inhibition; Cholinesterases

Introduction

Acetylcholine (ACh) is the major neurotransmitter synthesized from acetyl CoA and choline, by choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the cytoplasm (Ferreira-Vieira et al., 2016). It is uptaken by the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) into the synaptic vesicles to convey a synaptic signal to the postsynaptic neurons through its binding to nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChR) or muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChR) (Silverthorn et al., 2016). In the synaptic cleft, ACh is promptly hydrolyzed to acetate and choline through the catalysis of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme and recycled into the presynaptic neuron (Colovic et al., 2013). Alzheimer’s disease damages the brain cells that produce or use ACh, thereby reducing the amount of neurotransmitters available to carry neurological signals; whereas the amount of ChAT, nAChR, and mAChR are also abnormally downregulated in Alzheimer’s patients (Kihara & Shimohama, 2004; Lombardo & Maskos, 2015). Furthermore, the natural process of ACh metabolism facilitated by AChE further reduces the amount of ACh and weakens the transportation of electrical impulses in the cholinergic system (Hung & Fu, 2017). This results in impairments in motor function, memory and attention in patients.

While there is currently no cure for Alzheimer’s, clinicians have applied cholinesterases inhibitors (ChEIs) to prevent the hydrolysis of ACh by cholinesterases (ChEs) (Hung & Fu, 2017). The drugs indirectly aid in maintaining the ACh level that is important for learning and memory, and compensating the loss of functioning brain cells; thus, they enhance the symptoms related to memory thinking, language, judgment and other cognitive processes (Alzheimer’s Association Report, 2021). To date, three out of five U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved symptomatic medications for Alzheimer’s disease are ChEIs, namely Aricept (donepezil), Exelon (rivastigmine), and Razdyne (galantamine) (Alzheimer’s Association Report, 2021). Certain ChEIs seems to offer other benefits, for example, galantamine appears to stimulate the release of ACh and improve the way certain message-receiving neurons respond to it (Alzheimer’s Association Report, 2021); while rivastigmine is able to intensify the cholinergic activity by providing dual inhibition of AChE and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE), which further extend its usage in subcortical vascular and Parkinson’s disease dementia (Kandiah et al., 2017). Besides, Donepezil was reported with several beneficial impacts on behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as hallucinations, distractibility, aberrant motor behavior and apathy (Tsuno, 2009). Despite a small degree of improvement, clinical trials of all ChEIs are overall showing enhanced memory and thinking compared to placebo, as well as delay or slow worsening of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms in up to 40% of individuals who taken the medication (Mielke et al., 2012). Despite all the benefits above, ChEIs do not reverse Alzheimer’s nor stop the underlying degeneration of nerve cells. In fact, there is still risk of side effects that are unavoidable such as nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, bronchospasm and skin patches (Ruangritchankul et al., 2021). Knowing that nearly 10 million dementia patients are increasing every year (World Health Organisation, 2021) and the effect of current drugs are still in a large space to be improved, growing demand of getting better ChEIs with greater effect and lower side effects are gradually catching up, which has led us to explore any possibilities from the novel resources such as marine algae.

Consumption of algae has been revealed to prevent neurodegeneration. Studies showed that a higher seaweed intake in the Japanese diet and other East Asia countries compared to the European countries poised a lower neurodegenerative disorder risk (Okubo et al., 2017; Pangestuti & Kim, 2011). In Malaysia, red seaweed Gracilaria is commonly used in traditional dishes for the Malay natives along the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia as Kelantanese seaweed salad named ‘Kerabu Sare’. Gracilaria species including Gracilaria changii, Gracilaria firma, and G. manilaensis Yamamoto & Trono are potential agarophytic species that provide raw materials for agar production in the food industry and as a food source for shellfish and shrimp (Ng et al., 2017; Phang et al., 2019; Yow et al., 2013). Current findings on G. manilaensis showed that it possesses various bioactive compounds with potential therapeutic effects. This includes hexadecanoic acid and 2-hydroxymyristic acid that portray anticancer property, 1-(4’-methoxyphenyl)-3-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanone that portrays antioxidant property, as well as cholesteryl myristate that portrays antibacterial property (Andriani et al., 2016). G. manilaensis from Malaysia also possesses the neuritogenic effect and in vitro antioxidant activities (Pang et al., 2018). The proven neurological benefits have driven our interest to further investigate the anti-AChE activity of G. manilaensis and to determine the bioactive substance(s) that is responsible for this activity.

Materials and Methods

Specimen collection and processing

Fresh specimens of G. manilaensis were collected from Kuala Muda, Kedah. The specimens were washed with salt water to remove sands, mud and impurities, followed by the final rinse in distilled water and later froze. The frozen specimens were then freeze dried (Labogene, Germany) and pulverised. G. manilaensis powder was kept at −20°C prior to extracts preparation.

G. manilaensis extracts preparation

G. manilaensis extracts were prepared from the powder by maceration as described in Pang et al. (2018). Briefly, 1 g of seaweed powder was dissolved into hot boiling water, methanol and ethanol at the ratio of 1:50 (w/v) respectively. For hot aqueous extract (GMHW), the mixture was incubated in roller mixer for 30 min at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged at 2,688×g for 20 min at 4°C. After that, the supernatant was frozen and concentrated with a vacuum concentrator (Labogene, Germany). The dried product, GMHW was stored at −20°C until used. Meanwhile, for methanol and ethanol extracts (GMM and GME), the solvent-powder mixtures were incubated in an incubator shaker at 9×g for 36–48 h at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged at 2,688×g for 20 min at 4°C. Subsequently, the supernatants were further concentrated using a rotary evaporator and vacuum concentrator. Both extracts were stored at −20°C until used.

In vitro anti-cholinesterase assay

Ellman assay was used to determine the AChE and BuChE activities using the method described by Yoon et al. (2009) with slight modification. Each reaction was scaled to 200 μL reaction in a 96-well microplate. To prepare GMHW, distilled water was used as the vehicle. For GMM and the positive controls (eserine and isoxazole), 10% aqueous methanol was used as the vehicle. Meanwhile, 10% aqueous ethanol was used to dissolve GME. Briefly, 20 μL of the sample was added into 140 μL of sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and 20 μL of AChE (0.036 U/mL, C2888, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or BuChE (0.036 U/mL, C1057, Sigma-Aldrich). After 15 min of incubation, 20 μL of substrate ACh or BuCh (3 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) and 20 μL of 5-5’-thiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB, 5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) were added into the reaction mixture. The absorbance of each reaction mixture was read at 412 nm at 37°C by the kinetic loop of 3 min intervals for 15 min. The rate of reaction was obtained by the slope of absorbance against the time in minutes. The unit was expressed in absorbance/min. The AChE or BuChE inhibitory activity (%) was obtained by the formula:

AChE or BuChE inhibitory activity % = ( 1 Rate of reaction of samples Rate of reaction of the negative control ) × 100 %

The half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) values of the positive controls and the extracts were measured by adapting from the dose-depending relationship curve of AChE or BuChE activity % against the concentration of respective treatment. Three independent experiments were carried out to obtain the data in mean ± SD.

Enzyme kinetic study

Enzyme kinetic study was also carried out using the method described by Yoon et al. (2009) with slight modification. The concentrations of GMM and GMMG were fixed at their respective EC25 or EC50. Substrates of ascending concentration from 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 mM were added after 15 min of incubation. The reciprocal value of the rate of reaction (1/V) and the reciprocal value of the substrate concentration (1/[S] mM) was used to plot the line-weaver Burk plot. The values of enzyme activity (Km, mM), the maximum rate of reaction (Vmax, Absorbance/min) and inhibition constant (Ki, mg/mM) were obtained by three independent experiments. These experiments were repeated for its quarter-maximum EC25.

Isolation of active fractions

GMM was selected as the most potent extract to be further investigated in this study. To produce fractions, 200 g powder was extracted with 2 L of absolute methanol for five times. After the removal of powder by filtration, approximate 10 g of GMM was concentrated with a rotary evaporator, and then dissolved in absolute chloroform. The GMM (10 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel 60, elution successively with hexane-chloroform (4:6–1:9), chloroform, chloroform-methanol (99:1–90:1) and ethanol to produce 10 main fractions based on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) profile: GMMA (75.1 mg), GMMB (46.6 mg), GMMC (41.9 mg), GMMD (129.6 mg), GMME (97.6 mg), GMMF (283.4 mg), GMMG (272.6 mg), GMMH (85.6 mg), GMMI (339.2 mg), and GMMJ (1,227.3 mg).

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) analysis

GMMG was subjected to LCMS analysis with Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system coupled to Agilent 6520 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF mass spectrometer with dual ESI source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The column used was Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18, Narrow-Bore 2.1 × 150 mm, 3.5 micron (P/N: 930990-902) with mobile phase 0.1% formic acid in water and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. 1 μL of sample (1 mg/mL) was injected at the flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The result of chromatogram data was analysed with Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis B.07.00 (Method: Metabolomic-2019.m) matched with Metiln database based on mass over charge (m/z). Compounds were shortlisted by elimination of blank, include all the compounds with Score Db or Score MFG ≥ 90, and with Difference (Db.ppm) or Difference (MFG.ppm) that is ± 5. Activities of the known compound were matched with publication and database on Web of Science and PubChem.

Statistical analysis

The means of data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Dunnett and Tukey Post Hoc were implemented to test for the significant difference between extracts. All the analysis was done by Graph Pad Prism ver. 7.

Results

ChEs inhibitory activities of G. manilaensis

All G. manilaensis extracts possessed anti-AChE activity in majority of the tested concentrations (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, none of the extracts but isoxazole showed significant anti-BuChE activity (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). GMHW produced significant anti-AChE activity of 10.98 ± 1.67% at concentration as low as 0.0625 mg/mL (p < 0.005). The highest activity of GMHW observed was 38.23 ± 1.05% at 4 mg/mL. On the other hand, GMM and GME only showed significant anti-AChE activity at 0.125 mg/mL, with 8.62 ± 3.73% and 15.21 ± 1.28% respectively (p < 0.01 and p < 0.005). However, anti-AChE activity of GMM and GME observed a rapid increment from 2 mg/mL to 4 mg/mL, which resulted in a higher anti-AChE activity of 69.3 ± 7.16% and 49.94 ± 0.23% at 4 mg/mL respectively. Since GMM was the only extract that showed anti-AChE activity higher than 50% at 4 mg/mL, it was selected for the downstream fractionation process.

fas-25-2-49-g1
Fig. 1. AChE inhibition activity of Gracilaria manilaensis extracts and the positive controls. Data are expressed in mean ± SD (n = 3). *Arterisk symbol indicates significant differences (0 mg/mL) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005; Dunnett) against the negative control. Isoxazole was used as the positive control. AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMHW, hot water extract; GMM, methanol extract; GME, ethanol extract.
Download Original Figure
fas-25-2-49-g2
Fig. 2. BuChE inhibition activity of Gracilaria manilaensis extracts and the positive controls. Data are expressed in mean ± SD (n = 3). *Arterisk symbol indicates significant difference (0 mg/mL) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005; Dunnett) against the negative control. Isoxazole was used as the positive control. BuChE, butyrylcholinesterase; GMHW, hot water extract; GMM, methanol extract; GME, ethanol extract.
Download Original Figure

GMM was fractionated into 10 fractions according to the TLC profile (Fig. 3). All fractions except GMMD possessed significant anti-AChE activity (p < 0.05) against the negative control (Fig. 4). GMMA and GMME showed the lowest anti-AChE activity at 33.8 ± 4.6% and 37.1 ± 3.8% respectively. Meanwhile, GMMF, GMMH, and GMMJ showed moderate activity at 43.4 ± 7.7%, 45.3 ± 1.5% and 41.7 ± 1.9% respectively. Furthermore, GMMB, GMMC, and GMMI showed moderate-high anti-AChE activity at 54.4 ± 4.8%, 62.0 ± 1.1 and 53.6 ± 1.5% respectively. GMMG showed the highest anti-AChE activity at 69.2 ± 5.1%; thus, GMMG was selected for subsequent assay of cholinesterase inhibitory activities.

fas-25-2-49-g3
Fig. 3. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) profile of Gracilaria manilaensis methanol fraction GMMA to GMMJ. Each TLC plate from left to right was separated with different ratio of chloroform-methanol solvent system as labeled. GMM was used as the reference, marked as R in every TLC plate. GMM, methanol extract; GMMA-J, fraction A to J.
Download Original Figure
fas-25-2-49-g4
Fig. 4. AChE inhibition activity of 10 methanol fractions of Gracilaria manilaensis (GMMA to GMMJ) at 30 mg/mL with 10% aqueous methanol as the negative controls. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different alphabets indicated significant different to other data (p < 0.05; Tukey). AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMMA-J, fraction A to J.
Download Original Figure

GMMG showed positive AChE activity but negative BuChE activity (Fig. 5), similar to its predecessor, GMM. At the concentration of 0.375 mg/mL, GMMG started to show significant anti-AChE activity with 20.89 ± 0.27%. The anti-AChE activity of GMMG increased with the concentration, where it reached the highest at 3 mg/mL with 61.09 ± 6.15%.

fas-25-2-49-g5
Fig. 5. AChE and BuChE inhibition activities of GMMG and the positive controls. Data are expressed in mean ± SD (n = 3). *Arterisk indicates significant (0 mg/mL) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005; Dunnett) differences against the negative control. Eserine was used as the positive control. AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMMG, fraction G; BuChE, butyrylcholinesterase.
Download Original Figure

Anti-AChE and BuChE activities of G. manilaensis and the positive controls (eserine and isoxazole) expressed in EC50 (Table 1). In this study, eserine and isoxazole were used as the positive control. Eserine has been optimised in vitro in the Ellman assay as described in Yoon et al. (2008, 2009), whereby isoxazole is a novel AChE inhibitor described in Gutiérrez et al. (2013) which is effective against AChE from Electroporus electricus, the similar AChE used in our study model (C2888, Sigma-Aldrich). Notable, eserine showed the lowest EC50 at 10.6 ± 2.0 ng/mL, whereas GMM and GMMG showed anti-AChE activity with EC50 at 2.60 ± 0.16 mg/mL and 2.22 ± 0.27 mg/mL respectively, significantly lower than isoxazole and GME (p < 0.05). For BuChE, all samples were negative within the tested range, hence no EC50 value was shown. Based on Andriani et al. (2016), methanol was the best solvent to extract the anti-AChE compound(s) from G. manilaensis, which was similar to our findings. GMM and GMMG warrant a high potential for further testing.

Table 1. Anti-AChE and BuChE activities of GMHW, GMM, GME, GMMG and the positive controls in EC50 (mg/mL)
Samples EC50 (mg/mL)
Anti-AChE activity Anti-BuChE activity
Isoxazole* 4.10 ± 0.23a 32.47 ± 3.35a
Eserine* 1.06 × 10−5 ± 2.00 × 10−7b 3.41 × 10−5 ± 1.20 × 10−6b
GMHW Negative Negative
GMM 2.60 ± 0.16d Negative
GME 3.77 ± 0.20a Negative
GMMG 2.30 ± 0.18d Negative

Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Mean with different alphabet within the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05; Tukey).

Asterisk symbol indicates the positive controls.

AChE, acetylcholinesterase; BuChE, butyrylcholinesterase; GMHW, hot water extract; GMM, methanol extract; GME, ethanol extract; GMMG, fraction G.

Download Excel Table
AChE inhibitory kinetic of GMM and GMMG

GMM and GMMG were tested for their enzyme inhibition kinetic using the Lineweaver-Burk plot (Figs. 6 and 7). The presence of GMM increased the value of Km from 1.48 mM to 1.68 mM at EC25 (1.3 mg/mL) and 2.03 mM at EC50 (2.6 mg/mL). However, the value of Vmax was decreased from 0.0281 mM to 0.0231 mM at EC25 (1.3 mg/mL) and 0.0213 mM at EC50 (2.6 mg/mL) by GMM (Table 2). This matched the mixed-inhibition pattern of the Lineweaver-Burk plot, suggested that the GMM might possess bioactive compound(s) which can bind with both the enzyme and enzyme-substrate complex, with a higher affinity to the enzyme. GMM could be a mixed inhibitor to the anti-AChE activity.

fas-25-2-49-g6
Fig. 6. Line-weaver Burk plot of AChE activity in the presence of GMM. AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMM, methanol extract.
Download Original Figure
fas-25-2-49-g7
Fig. 7. Line-weaver Burk plot of AChE activity in the presence of GMMG isolated from methanol extract. AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMMG, fraction G.
Download Original Figure
Table 2. The kinetic parameter of AChE activity in the presence of GMM
Inhibitors Km (mM) Vmax (mM) Ki
Without inhibitor 1.48 0.028
EC25 (1.3 mg/mL) 1.68 0.023 3.36
EC50 (2.6 mg/mL) 2.03 0.021 3.18

AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMM, methanol extract.

Download Excel Table

On the other hand, GMMG decreased the value of Km from 1.78 mM to 1.55 mM at EC25 (1.15 mg/mL) and 1.33 mM at EC50 (2.30 mg/mL). The value of Vmax was decreased from 0.026 mM to 0.02 mM at EC25 (1.15 mg/mL) and 0.016 mM at EC50 (2.30 mg/mL) by GMMG (Table 3). This matched the uncompetitive inhibition pattern of the Lineweaver-Burk plot, suggested that the GMMG possess bioactive compound(s) which can bind with the enzyme-substrate complex specifically. GMMG could be an uncompetitive inhibitor to the anti-AChE activity.

Table 3. The kinetic parameter of AChE activity in the presence of GMMG
Inhibitor Km (mM) Vmax (mM) Ki
Without inhibitor 1.78 0.026
EC25 (1.15 mg/mL) 1.55 0.020 7.21
EC50 (2.30 mg/mL) 1.33 0.016 10.32

AChE, acetylcholinesterase; GMMG, fraction G.

Download Excel Table
Identification of compound(s) in GMMG

LCMS analysis was carried out and the results detected 136 peaks in the positive ion mass spectra. Of these, 28 peaks were matched with the identity of known molecules on the Metlin database, with Molecular Formula Generator (MFG) scores above 90% and ± 5 differences in MFG scores. The proposed compounds were searched and presented in Table 4. Interestingly, cynerine A, graveolinine, militarinone A, eplerenone and curumenol are the neuroprotective-related compounds detected among the 28 known compounds. In contrast, 10 other compounds that had MFG scores above the cut-off did not match with any molecules in the library, indicating a large family of new unknown compounds that are yet to be explored in GMMG (Table 5). The chromatograms and MS spectra of compounds were shown in Figs. 3 and 8.

Table 4. Identified compounds in GMMG fraction through LCMS analysis
No Name Formula m/z Mass Group Activity Related compound(s) Activity
1 4-(2-hydroxypropoxy)-3,5-dimethyl-phenol C11H16 O3 197.12 196.11 Alcohol • No record
2 Dioscoretine C13 H23NO3 242.17 241.17 Fatty acid • No record
3 2-Phenylethyl 3-methylbutanoate C13 H18O2 207.14 206.13 Carboxylic acid • No record
4 ML-236C C18H26O3 291.20 290.19 Carbobicylic compound • Anticholesteremic (Endo et al., 1976)
5 C16 Sphinganine C16H35NO2 274.27 273.27 Lipid: Phospholipid • Antibacteria (Reid et al., 2019)
• Anticancer (Bagheri et al., 2018)
6 2,6-Nonadien-1-ol C9H16O 158.15 140.12 Fatty alcohol • Flavour compound (Kemp et al., 1974; Flath et al., 1983; McGinty et al., 2010; Api et al., 2015, 2019)
7 (–)-trans-C75 C14H22O4 272.19 254.15 Carboxylic acid • No record
8 Cyrneine A* C20H28O3 317.21 316.20 Terpene: Diterpene • Neurite outgrowth (Marcotullio et al., 2006; Obara et al., 2007) Cyathane diterpene group • Anti-oxidant (Marcotullio et al., 2008)
• Anti-nitric oxide (Wang et al., 2014)
• Neurite outgrowth (Cao et al., 2018)
• Anti-bacterial (Nitthithanasilp et al., 2018)
9 7beta-Hydroxy-lathyrol C20H30O4 335.22 334.21 Lipid: Diterpene • No record
10 Graveolinine* C17H13NO3 297.12 279.09 Quinonline Anti-angiogenesis (An et al., 2010)
Anti-tumor and anti-platelet aggregation (Wu et al., 2003)
Anti-AChE and anti-β amyloid (Luo et al., 2020)
11 3α-Hydroxy-4,4-bisnor-8,11,13-podocarpatriene C15H20O 217.16 216.15 Phenol • No record
12 Militarinone A* C26H37NO6 460.27 459.26 Pyridine alkaloid • Neurite outgrowth (Schmidt et al., 2002; Riese et al., 2004; Küenzi et al., 2008) 4-hydroxy-2-pyridone • Neurite outgrowth (Schröder et al., 2015)
(+)-N-Deoxymilitarinone A • Neurite outgrowth (Cheng et al., 2006)
13 Eplerenone* C24H30O6 432.24 414.21 Lactone • Anti-inflammation (Suzuki et al., 2006; Xiao et al., 2009; Bayorh et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013, 2018; Łabuzek et al., 2014; Wada et al., 2017; Vecchiola et al., 2020)
• Neuroprotective (Dong et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2020)
14 Curcumenol* C15H22O2 235.17 234.16 Curcumin • Anti-neuroinflammation (Tanaka et al., 2008; Lo et al., 2015; Hsiao et al., 2020; Pintatum et al., 2020) Oxycurcuminol • Anti-stroke (Chen et al., 2018)
• Antioxidant
• Neuroprotective (Hamdi et al., 2015)
15 (+–)-Trihydroxy-decipiadiene C20H32O3 321.24 320.23 Lipid: Isoprenoid • No record
16 alhpa-Tocopheronolactone C16H22O4 301.14 278.15 Lipid: Isoprenoid • No record
17 N-cis-Tetradec-9Z-enoyl-L-Homoserine lactone C18H31NO3 310.24 309.23 Lactone • No record
18 Stigmatellin Y C29H40O6 502.32 484.28 Phenol • No record
19 Anandamide (20:l, n-9) C22H43NO2 376.32 353.33 Fatty amide • No record
20 2-Amino-14,16-dimethyloctadecan-3-ol C20H43NO 336.32 313.33 Amino alcohol • No record
21 2-Ethyl-dodecanoic acid C14H28O2 229.22 228.21 Fatty acid • No record
22 (–)-Isoamijiol C20H32O2 322.27 304.24 Lipid: Isoprenoid • No record
23 Palmitic amide C16H33NO 256.26 255.26 Fatty amide • No record
24 Coproporphyrin IV C36H38N4O8 655.28 654.27 Porphyrin • No record
25 Cassaidine C24H41NO4 408.31 407.30 Tricylic diterpenoids • No record
26 Haplophytine C37H40N4O7 653.30 652.29 Indole alkaloid • No record
27 24,25-Epoxy-cholesterol C27H44O2 401.34 400.33 Desmosterol • No record
28 MGDG(18:1(9Z)/18:1(9Z)) C45H82O10 805.58 782.59 Glycosyldiradylglycerols • No record

Compound marked with asterisk symbol indicates compound with previously identified neuroprotective properties.

GMMG, fraction G; LCMS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; AChE, acetylcholinesterase.

Download Excel Table
Table 5. Unidentified compounds in GMMG
Formula m/z mass
C15H29N5O4 344.2285 343.2213
C20H37N15O2 520.3326 519.3255
C27H53N5O10 608.3857 607.379
C22H22N6O4 435.1767 434.1696
C21H29N3O8 452.2022 451.1949
C28H32N2O3S 477.2227 476.2139
C11H18O3 199.1329 198.1255
C22H41NO2 352.3236 351.3139
C31H36N14S 654.3324 636.2978
C37H34N8O3 639.2822 638.2753

GMMG, fraction G.

Download Excel Table
fas-25-2-49-g8
Fig. 8. LCMS chromatogram of GMMG. LCMS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; GMMG, fraction G.
Download Original Figure

Discussion

To date, there are many red algae with anti-AChE activity have been reported, including Hypnea valentiae (Suganthy et al., 2010), Gracilaria edulis (Suganthy et al., 2010), Gelidiella acerosa (Syad et al., 2012, 2016), Hypnea musciformis (Machado et al., 2015), Ochtodes secundiramea (Machado et al., 2015), Pterocladiella capillacea (Machado et al., 2015), Gelidium foliaceum (Kannan et al., 2013), Amphiroa beauvoisii (Kannan et al., 2013), Laurencia complanate (Kannan et al., 2013), Rhodomelopsis africana (Kannan et al., 2013), Porphyra tenera (Senevirathne et al., 2010), G. changii (Andriani et al., 2016) and G. manilaensis (Andriani et al., 2016). In contrast, this is the first comprehensive study of Malaysian G. manilaensis whereby the anti-AChE and BuChE activities and their inhibition kinetic were reported. In the present study, GMM and GMMG possess anti-AChE activity closely compared to the ethanol extracts of H. valentiae and G. edulis, with IC50 of 2.6 mg/mL and 3.5 mg/mL respectively (Suganthy et al., 2010). However, G. manilaensis did not show anti-BuChE activity compared to other red algae, postulating that the bioactive compounds that are responsible for anti-AChE activity in G. manilaensis are selective towards AChE but not BuChE. This finding revealed that G. manilaensis may have a lower tendency to cause toxicity compared to other red algae according to Jońca et al. (2015). BuChE is also known as plasma cholinesterase, which is most abundant in plasma, pancreas and liver (Jońca et al., 2015). Jońca et al. (2015) stated that “BuChE serves as the first line of defence to the toxic compounds that reach the bloodstream that might inhibit AChE, the sister enzyme that located in the nervous system” . Hence, G. manilaensis could be a weaker but safer anti-AChE agent compared to other algae.

Andriani et al. (2016) has reported hexanoic acid as the main contributor to the positive AChE inhibitory activity in their preliminary screening. In contrast, we have only discovered two fatty acids, 2-ethyl-dodecanoic acid and dioscoretine which do not have relevant activities to AChE and BuChE, besides dioscoretine for its hypoglycaemic effect (Loizzo et al., 2017). On the other hand, ML-236C, C16 Sphignosine and 2,6-Nonadien-1-ol in GMMG also do not contain neuroprotective and ChEs inhibitory activity. ML-236C, also known as (4R,6R)-6-[2-[(1S,2S,8aR)-2-methyl-1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl]ethyl]-4-hydroxyoxan-2-one, is a carbobicyclic compound with anti-cholesteremic activity that was isolated from fungus Pythium ultimum (Endo et al., 1976). C16 Sphignosine is a phospholipid that possesses anti-bacteria (Reid et al., 2019) and anti-cancer activities (Bagheri et al., 2018). 2,6-Nonadien-1-ol is a volatile fatty alcohol that function as a flavour compound described in many papers (Api et al., 2015, 2019; Flath et al., 1983; Kemp et al., 1974; McGinty et al., 2010).

The five neuroprotective compounds discovered in GMMG were drawn to our attention. Graveolinine is the only compound in GMMG that has been reported to positively inhibit AChE (Luo et al., 2020). Besides, graveolinine and its derivative also demonstrated neuroprotective activity against the neurotoxicity of β-amyloid and scopolamine (Luo et al., 2020). Meanwhile, cyneirne A (Marcotullio et al., 2006; Obara et al., 2007) and militarinone A (Küenzi et al., 2008; Riese et al., 2004; Schmidt et al., 2002) possess neurite outgrowth activity against PC12 cells. Interestingly, their respective derivatives, cyathane diterpene (Cao et al., 2018), as well as 4-hydroxy-2-pyridone (Schröder et al., 2015) and (+)-N-deoxymilitarinone A (Cheng et al., 2006) also displayed neurite outgrowth activity as their precursors. Curcumenol (Hamdi et al., 2015) and Eplerenone (Dong et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2020) are also neuroprotective towards neuronal cell lines and mouse brain. Curcumenol also shown anti-neuroinflammatory activity against LPS-stimulated murine BV2 microglia (Hsiao et al., 2020; Lo et al., 2015; Pintatum et al., 2020; Tanaka et al., 2008), whereby eplerenone shown anti-inflammatory activity to a variety of illnesses and conditions such as viral myocarditis (Xiao et al., 2009), heart-related inflammations (Chen et al., 2018; Łabuzek et al., 2014; Suzuki et al., 2006), renal inflammation (Bayorh et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013) and obesity-associated inflammasome (Vecchiola et al., 2020; Wada et al., 2017). These compounds made GMMG a very promising neuroprotective fraction to be used as nutraceutical agents for neuronal health.

Our findings disclosed that GMM and GMMG of G. manilaensis possessed inhibitory activity to AChE but not BuChE. GMM and GMMG showed mixed inhibition and uncompetitive inhibition to the AChE activity respectively. The anti-AChE activity of GMMG is likely to be contributed by graveolinine. Taking together, graveolinine from G. manilaensis can be a promising lead compound for the development of anti-Alzheimer medicine in future. However, it is crucial to further validate the cholinesterase inhibitory activities of G. manilaensis in animal cell culture in vitro and in vivo assays.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This research was funded by Sunway Internal Research Grants (Project No: INT-FST-DBS-2016-1, INTS-2017-SST-DBS-01 and INTS-2018-SST-DBS-09) from Sunway University and Jeffery Cheah Foundation Scholarship.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research has been approved by Sunway University Research Ethics Committee (Ethical Application Ref: PGSUREC2017/030).

References

1.

Alzheimer’s Association Report. 2021 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. J Alzheimer Dement. 2021; 17:327-406

2.

An ZY, Yan YY, Peng D, Ou TM, Tan JH, Huang SL, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of graveoline and graveolinine derivatives with potent anti-angiogenesis activities. Eur J Med Chem. 2010; 45:3895-903

3.

Andriani Y, Syamsumir DF, Yee TC, Harisson FS, Herng GM, Abdullah SA, et al. Biological activities of isolated compounds from three edible Malaysian red seaweeds, Gracilaria changii, G. manilaensis and Gracilaria sp. Nat Prod Commun. 2016; 11:1117-20

4.

Api AM, Belsito D, Bhatia S, Bruze M, Calow P, Dagli ML, et al. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, (2E,6Z)-nona-2,6-dien-1-ol, CAS registry number 28069-72-9. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015; 84:S57-65

5.

Api AM, Belsito D, Botelho D, Bruze M, Burton GA, Buschmann J, et al. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment,(E,Z)-2,6-nonadien-1-ol acetate, CAS registry number 68555-65-7. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019; 127:S216-23

6.

Bagheri E, Hajiaghaalipour F, Nyamathulla S, Salehen NA. Ethanolic extract of Brucea javanica inhibit proliferation of HCT-116 colon cancer cells via caspase activation. RSC Advances. 2018; 8:681-9

7.

Bayorh M, Rollins-Hairston A, Adiyiah J, Lyn D, Eatman D. Eplerenone inhibits aldosterone-induced renal expression of cyclooxygenase. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2012; 13:353-9

8.

Cao CY, Zhang CC, Shi XW, Li D, Cao W, Yin X, et al. Sarcodonin G derivatives exhibit distinctive effects on neurite outgrowth by modulating NGF signaling in PC12 cells. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018; 9:1607-15

9.

Chen B, Geng J, Gao SX, Yue WW, Liu Q. Eplerenone modulates interleukin-33/sST2 signaling and IL-1β in left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2018; 38:137-44

10.

Chen H, Sun F, Zhong X, Shao Y, Yoshimura A, Liu Y, et al. Eplerenone-mediated aldosterone blockade prevents renal fibrosis by reducing renal inflammation, interstitial cell proliferation and oxidative stress. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2013; 37:557-66

11.

Cheng Y, Schneider B, Riese U, Schubert B, Li Z, Hamburger M. (+)-N-Deoxymilitarinone, A, a neuritogenic pyridone alkaloid from the insect pathogenic fungus Paecilomyces farinosus. J Nat Prod. 2006; 69:436-8

12.

Colović MB, Krstić DZ, Lazarević-Pašti TD, Bondžić AM, Vasić VM. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2013; 11:315-35

13.

Dong F, Xie W, Strong JA, Zhang JM. Mineralocorticoid receptor blocker eplerenone reduces pain behaviors in vivo and decreases excitability in small-diameter sensory neurons from local inflamed dorsal root ganglia in vitro. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117:1102-12

14.

Endo A, Kuroda M, Tsujita Y. ML-236A, ML-236B, and ML-236C, new inhibitors of cholesterogenesis produced by Penicillium citrinium. J Antibiot. 1976; 29:1346-8

15.

Flath RA, Mon TR, Lorenz G, Whitten J, Mackley JW. Volatile components of Acacia sp. blossoms. J Agric Food Chem. 1983; 31:1167-70

16.

Gutiérrez M, Matus MF, Poblete T, Amigo J, Vallejos G, Astudillo L, et al. Isoxazoles: synthesis, evaluation and bioinformatic design as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013; 65:1796-804

17.

Ferreira-Vieira TH, Guimaraes IM, Silva FR, Ribeiro FM. Alzheimer’s disease: targeting the cholinergic system. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016; 14:101-15

18.

Hamdi OAA, Ye LJ, Kamarudin MNA, Hazni H, Paydar M, Looi CY, et al. Neuroprotective and antioxidant constituents from Curcuma zedoaria rhizomes. Rec Nat Prod. 2015; 9:349-55.

19.

Hsiao JW, Chen LC, Lin CL, Chang TH, Chen CL, Sung PJ, et al. A new sesquiterpenoid and bioactive constituents of Curcuma zedoaria. Chem Nat Compd. 2020; 56:1076-80

20.

Hung SY, Fu WM. Drug candidates in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. J Biomed Sci. 2017; 24:47

21.

Jońca J, Żuk M, Wasąg B, Janaszak-Jasiecka A, Lewandowski K, Wielgomas B, et al. New insights into butyrylcholinesterase activity assay : serum dilution factor as a crucial parameter. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10e0139480

22.

Kandiah N, Pai MC, Senanarong V, Looi I, Ampil E, Park KW, et al. Rivastigmine: the advantages of dual inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase and its role in subcortical vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia. Clin Interv Aging. 2017; 12:697-707

23.

Kannan RRR, Aderogba MA, Ndhlala AR, Stirk WA, Van Staden J. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of phlorotannins isolated from the brown alga, Ecklonia maxima (Osbeck) Papenfuss. Food Res Int. 2013; 54:1250-4

24.

Kemp TR, Knavel DE, Stoltz LP. Identification of some volatile compounds from cucumber. J Agric Food Chem. 1974; 22:717-8

25.

Kihara T, Shimohama S. Alzheimer’s disease and acetylcholine receptors. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2004; 64:99-105.

26.

Küenzi P, Kiefer S, Koryakina A, Hamburger M. Promotion of cell death or neurite outgrowth in PC-12 and N2a cells by the fungal alkaloid militarinone A depends on basal expression of p53. Apoptosis. 2008; 13:364-76

27.

Łabuzek K, Liber S, Bułdak Ł, Krupej-Kędzierska J, Machnik G, Bobrzyk M, et al. Eplerenone mimics features of the alternative activation in macrophages obtained from patients with heart failure and healthy volunteers. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014; 726:96-108

28.

Lo JY, Kamarudin MNA, Hamdi OAA, Awang K, Kadir HA. Curcumenol isolated from Curcuma zedoaria suppresses Akt-mediated NF-κB activation and p38 MAPK signaling pathway in LPS-stimulated BV-2 microglial cells. Food Funct. 2015; 6:3550-9

29.

Loizzo MR, Bonesi M, Nabavi SM, Sobarzo-Sánchez E, Rastrelli L, Tundis R, et al. Hypoglycaemic effects of plants food constituents via inhibition of carbohydrate-hydrolysing enzymes: from chemistry to future applications.In In: Andrade PB, Valentão P, Pereira DM, editors.editors Natural products targeting clinically relevant enzymes. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH. 2017; p. 135-53

30.

Lombardo S, Maskos U. Role of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and treatment. Neuropharmacology. 2015; 96:255-62

31.

Luo W, Lv JW, Wang T, Zhang ZY, Guo HY, Song ZY, et al. Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation of novel graveolinine derivatives as potential anti-Alzheimer’s agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2020; 28:115190

32.

Machado LP, Carvalho LR, Young MCM, Cardoso-Lopes EM, Centeno DC, Zambotti-Villela L, et al. Evaluation of acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of Brazilian red macroalgae organic extracts. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2015; 25:657-62

33.

Marcotullio MC, Mwankie GNO-M, Cossignani L, Tirillini B, Pagiotti R. Phytochemical analysis and antiradical properties of Sarcodon imbricatus (L.:Fr) Karsten. Nat Prod Commun. 2008; 3:1907-10

34.

Marcotullio MC, Pagiott R, Maltese F, Obara Y, Hoshino T, Nakahata N, et al. Neurite outgrowth activity of cyathane diterpenes from Sarcodon cyrneus, cyrneines A and B. Planta Med. 2006; 72:819-23

35.

McGinty D, Letizia CS, Api AM. Fragrance material review on (2E,6Z)-nona-2,6-dien-1-ol. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010; 48:S91-2

36.

Mielke MM, Leoutsakos JM, Corcoran CD, Green RC, Norton MC, Welsh-Bohmer KA, et al. Effects of food and drug administration-approved medications for Alzheimer’s disease on clinical progression. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8:180-7

37.

Ng PK, Lin SM, Lim PE, Hurtado AQ, Phang SM, et al. Genetic and morphological analyses of Gracilaria firma and G. changii (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta), the commercially important agarophytes in western Pacific. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12:1-21

38.

Nitthithanasilp S, Intaraudom C, Boonyuen N, Suvannakad R, Pittayakhajonwut P. Antimicrobial activity of cyathane derivatives from Cyathus subglobisporus BCC44381. Tetrahedron. 2018; 74:6907-16

39.

Obara Y, Hoshino T, Marcotullio MC, Pagiotti R, Nakahata N. A novel cyathane diterpene, cyrneine A, induces neurite outgrowth in a Rac1-dependent mechanism in PC12 cells. Life Sci. 2007; 80:1669-77

40.

Okubo H, Inagaki H, Gondo Y, Kamide K, Ikebe K, Masui Y, et al. Association between dietary patterns and cognitive function among 70-year-old Japanese elderly: a cross-sectional analysis of the SONIC study. Nutr J. 2017; 16:56

41.

Pang JR, Goh VMJ, Tan CY, Phang SM, Wong KH, Yow YY, et al. Neuritogenic and in vitro antioxidant activities of Malaysian Gracilaria manilaensis Yamamoto & Trono. J Appl Phycol. 2018; 30:3253-60

42.

Pangestuti R, Kim SK. Neuroprotective effects of marine algae. Mar Drugs. 2011; 9:803-18

43.

Phang SM, Yeong HY, Lim PE. The seaweed resources of Malaysia. Bot Mar. 2019; 62:265-73

44.

Pintatum A, Maneerat W, Logie E, Tuenter E, Sakavitsi ME, Pieters L, et al. in vitro anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and cytotoxic activities of four Curcuma species and the isolation of compounds from Curcuma aromatica rhizome. Biomolecules. 2020; 10:799

45.

Reid T, Kashangura C, Chidewe C, Benhura MA, Stray-Pedersen B, Mduluza T, et al. Characterization of anti-Salmonella typhi compounds from medicinal mushroom extracts from Zimbabwe. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2019; 21:713-24

46.

Riese U, Ziegler E, Hamburger M. Militarinone A induces differentiation in PC12 cells via MAP and Akt kinase signal transduction pathways. FEBS Lett. 2004; 577:455-9

47.

Ruangritchankul S, Chantharit P, Srisuma S, Gray LC. Adverse drug reactions of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in older people living with dementia: a comprehensive literature review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021; 17:927-49

48.

Schmidt K, Günther W, Stoyanova S, Schubert B, Li Z, Hamburger M, et al. Militarinone A, a neurotrophic pyridone alkaloid from Paecilomyces militaris. Org Lett. 2002; 4:197-9

49.

Schröder P, Förster T, Kleine S, Becker C, Richters A, Ziegler S, et al. Neuritogenic militarinone-inspired 4-hydroxypyridones target the stress pathway kinase MAP4K4. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015; 54:12398-403

50.

Senevirathne M, Ahn CB, Je JY. Enzymatic extracts from edible red algae, Porphyra tenera, and their antioxidant, anti-acetylcholinesterase, and anti-inflammatory activities. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2010; 19:1551-7

51.

Silverthorn DU. Neruons: Cellular and network properties.In Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach. London: Pearson. 2016; p. 277-84.

52.

Suganthy N, Karutha Pandian S, Pandima Devi K. Neuroprotective effect of seaweeds inhabiting South Indian coastal area (Hare Island, Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Reserve): cholinesterase inhibitory effect of Hypnea valentiae and Ulva reticulata. Neurosci Lett. 2010; 468:216-9

53.

Suzuki J, Iwai M, Mogi M, Oshita A, Yoshii T, Higaki J, et al. Eplerenone with valsartan effectively reduces atherosclerotic lesion by attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26:917-21

54.

Syad AN, Rajamohamed BS, Shunmugaiah KP, Kasi PD. Neuroprotective effect of the marine macroalga Gelidiella acerosa: identification of active compounds through bioactivity-guided fractionation. Pharm Biol. 2016; 54:2073-81

55.

Syad AN, Shunmugiah KP, Kasi PD. Assessment of anticholinesterase activity of Gelidiella acerosa : implications for its therapeutic potential against Alzheimer’s disease. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012; 2012:497242

56.

Tanaka K, Kuba Y, Ina A, Watanabe H, Komatsu K. Prediction of cyclooxygenase inhibitory activity of Curcuma rhizome from chromatograms by multivariate analysis. Chem Pharm Bull. 2008; 56:936-40

57.

Tsuno N. Donepezil in the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009; 9:591-8

58.

Vecchiola A, Fuentes CA, Solar I, Lagos CF, Opazo MC, Muñoz-Durango N, et al. Eplerenone implantation improved adipose dysfunction averting RAAS activation and cell division. Front Endocrinol. 2020; 11:223

59.

Wada T, Ishikawa A, Watanabe E, Nakamura Y, Aruga Y, Hasegawa H, et al. Eplerenone prevented obesity-induced inflammasome activation and glucose intolerance. J Endocrinol. 2017; 235:179-91

60.

Wang B, Han J, Xu W, Chen Y, Liu H. Production of bioactive cyathane diterpenes by a bird’s nest fungus Cyathus gansuensis growing on cooked rice. Food Chem. 2014; 152:169-76

61.

Wang X, Zhu Y, Wang S, Wang Z, Sun H, He Y, et al. Effects of eplerenone on cerebral aldosterone levels and brain lesions in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020; 42:531-8

62.

World Health Organisation. Dementia. 2021[cited 2021 Aug 21]https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia

63.

Wu TS, Shi LS, Wang JJ, Iou SC, Chang HC, Chen YP, et al. Cytotoxic and antiplatelet aggregation principles of Ruta graveolens. J Chin Chem Soc. 2003; 50:171-8

64.

Xiao J, Shimada M, Liu W, Hu D, Matsumori A. Anti-inflammatory effects of eplerenone on viral myocarditis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11:349-53

65.

Yoon NY, Chung HY, Kim HR, Choi JE. Acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities of sterols and phlorotannins from Ecklonia stolonifera. Fish Sci. 2008; 74:200-7

66.

Yoon NY, Lee SH, Yong Li, Kim SK. Phlorotannins from Ishige okamurae and their acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory effects. J Funct Foods. 2009; 1:331-5

67.

Yow YY, Lim PE, Phang SM. Assessing the use of mitochondrial cox1 gene and cox2-3 spacer for genetic diversity study of Malaysian Gracilaria changii (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) from Peninsular Malaysia. J Appl Phycol. 2013; 25:831-8