RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative study on growth of leafy vegetables grown in a hybrid BFT-aquaponics using Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica and hydroponics

Dong-Hoon Lee1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-6778, Jeong-Dae Kim2,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-319X
Author Information & Copyright
1Gyeonggi Province Maritime and Fisheries Research Institute, Yangpyeong 12513, Korea
2College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
*Corresponding author: Jeong-Dae Kim, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea, Tel: +82-33-250-8634, Fax: +82-33-259-5572, E-mail:menzang@gmail.com

Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 23, 2021; Revised: Apr 27, 2021; Accepted: Jun 06, 2021

Published Online: Jul 31, 2021

Abstract

Aquaponics is a cultivation system that combines aquaculture and agricultural hydroponics. This study investigated the productivity of leafy vegetables cultivated in the hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics (HBFT-AP) using Japanese eel fed two kinds of diets (Mash, commercial powdered feed and extruded pellet [EP]) and hydroponics (HP).The mash was fed to the fish in a type of a dough mixed with water for 6 weeks (Exp1) and switched to the EP containing 2.7% monobasic potassium phosphate (MKP) for subsequent 6 weeks (Exp2). Leafy vegetables of 8 cultivar were employed in the experiment and water quality [dissolved oxygen (DO, mg/L), pH, water temperature (°C), electrical conductivity (EC; μs/cm), turbidity (NTU), TAN (NH3 + NH4+) (mg/L), NO2-N (mg/L), NO3-N (mg/L) and PO4-P (mg/L)] was measured 6 times a week. Leafy vegetable productivity (HBFT-AP vs HP) was compared in respective experiment, which was similar or somewhat higher in HBFT-AP. During the 12-week feeding trial, concentrations of nitrite (NO2-N) and phosphorus (PO4-P) were kept low in variability while total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) and NO3-N levels increased with time in HBFT-AP. At the end of two feeding trials, values of weight gain (WG, %), feed efficiency (FE, %), specific growth rate (SGR, %) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) were higher in Exp2 than in Exp1. As well, higher values in hematocrit (PCV, %), plasma K (mEq/L) and inorganic phosphorus (mg/dL) were found (p < 0.05) in Exp2 where fish were fed the EP (EP: 38.60%, 2.80 mEq/L and 7.04 g/dL; Mash: 33.20%, 1.95 mEq/L and 5.50 g/dL). Leafy vegetables in HBFT-AP using Japanese eel fed the EP with MKP 2.7% had a productivity similar (4 kinds of cultivar) or somewhat higher (4 kinds of cultivar) compared to those in HP. Also, Japanese eel fed the EP showed higher values of Pi (m/dL) and K (mEq/L) in plasma compared to those fed commercial powder diet.

Keywords: Anguilla japonica; Feeds; Aquaponics; Monobasic potassium phosphate (MKP); Hydroponics; Productivity

Introduction

In recent years, strict regulations have been applied to protect environmental pollution by aquaculture because it is well known to be the major contributor to the increasing level of organic waste and toxic compounds in the aquatic ecosystems (NIFS, 2013). In addition, hydroponics is a technology for growing plants in nutrient solutions with or without an artificial medium to provide mechanical support. Major problems for hydroponic cultivation are higher operational cost and the generation of the pollution due to discharge of waste nutrient solution. The effluent released into the environment can have negative impacts on the surrounding ecosystems as well as the potential to contaminate the groundwater (Kumar & Cho, 2014). For this reason, studies on the stable reuse of the drainage are currently underway (Gieling et al., 2005; Gutiérrez et al. 2008), but have not been put into practical use due to technical limitations.

To date, recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) and biofloc technology (BFT) are representative aquaculture methods without water exchange of rearing tank (Avnimelech et al., 2015; FAO, 1986). In Korea, RAS does not completely reuse water and it is common that less than 10% of the total circulating water is replenished per day (Suh et al., 2001). Russo et al. (1981) reported that RAS method may cause problems such as deterioration of fish growth and disease occurrence due to lack of dissolved oxygen (DO), increase of dissolved organic matters and accumulation of inorganic matters such as NH3-N and CO2. So, several devices (sedimentation tank, filter, rotating disc contactor, packed bed reactor, fluidized bed reactor, foam separator, UV sterilizer, etc.) are required to remove solids, NH3-N and CO2 in the system (Losordo et al., 1994; Reyes & Lawson, 1996). However, Schneider et al. (2006) reported that industrial expansion of RAS is slow due to high initial capital investment. Therefore, there are many freshwater aquaculture farms which are operated by running water method through a simple sedimentation facility in Korea and RAS system are limited to farming of highly expensive fish such as eel. BFT (biofloc thechnology) is a method of aquaculture recycling water of fish rearing tank using equipment such as air-lift, air-stone, venturi-pump, etc. and this method was introduced in the 2000s in Korea. The pollutant such as NH3-N generated by aquatic organisms and unconsumed feed is used by heterotrophic microorganisms for cell growth and proliferation, and at this time, the microorganisms use organic carbon together. It is known that the C:N ratio for optimal growth of microorganisms is about 15:1–20:1 and because the amount of organic carbon in feed supplied to fish is insufficient to grow heterotrophic microorganisms, organic carbon must be artificially added. BFT, therefore, is a technique that maintains the water quality by inducing the formation of a microorganism (biofloc) and then feeding it back to aquatic organisms (fish and crustaceans), which is very effective in terms of cost compared to RAS (Avnimelech et al., 2015).

Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) has been farmed for a long time in northeast Asia such as Korea, Japan, and China. In Korea, eel aquaculture production amounted to 10,873 metric tons as of 2019 year, accounting for a significant share in inland fishery production (MOF, 2019). However, the unstable price of eel fry dependent upon natural harvesting makes its successful farming difficult. Furthermore, the introduction of a RAS for high density and rapid growth of eel may cause an increase in infrastructure costs. Eel is cultured at the range of water temperature of 25°C–30°C throughout the year, therefore, it is applicable to the BFT aquaculture (Cho et al., 2015).

Aquaponics is a cultivation system that combines aquaculture and agricultural hydroponics. The feed is supplied for growth and survival of aquaculture organisms in the system. Various inorganic substances like ammonia and nitrates are produced through the decomposition of unconsumed feed and fecal matters by heterotrophic and autotrophic microorganisms. Plants grow by absorbing the nutrients mineralized by the microorganisms and then the purified water is returned to fish rearing tank. Therefore, aquaponics provides an eco-friendly environment that enables a continuous production of agricultural and aquatic products without exchange of cultivation water (FAO, 2014). Fish feed generally includes 13 types of nutrients (N, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, B, Mo, and Al) that plants need. It could provide an enough amount of nutrients for growth of plants, but some such as Ca, K, and Fe are present in a very insufficient degree and must be added artificially (Rakocy, 2007). It was proposed for UVI (university of virgin islands) aquaponics to artificially add the insufficient nutrients such as Ca, K, Fe, and P for optimum growth of plants, which was now universalized worldwide (Bailey & Ferrarezi, 2017; Rakocy et al., 2006). Phosphorus (P) is one of the essential nutrients for maintaining normal life phenomena related to growth, reproduction, and health of animals and plants. Phosphorus, in the form of phosphate, plays an important role in fundamental biochemical reactions such as respiration, photosynthesis, muscle contraction, cell division, transmission of genetic information, and fermentation (Lall, 1991). Aquatic animals as well as land animals cannot efficiently use phosphorus in animal and vegetable resources, thus either monocalcium phosphate (MCP), dicalcium phosphate (DCP) or tricalcium phosphate (TCP) is added to the feed for their maximum growth (Kim et al., 1998). TCP found in phosphate rock and animal bones is soluble only in strong acids, so stomachless fish like carp do not use it, while being highly available by trout (Ogino et al., 1979).

Lee et al. (2019b) reported that potassium monophosphate (MKP) instead of conventional additive for P in diet for Far Eastern catfish (Silurus asotus) resulted in an increase in concentrations of P and K in the aquaponic system and an improvement in plant productivity. Also, Lee et al. (2019a) reported that leafy vegetables in the aquaponics had a productivity comparable to hydroponics using nutrient solution when a blend of beneficial microorganisms and feed containing MKP of 2.7% are applied in hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics (HBFT-AP).

The purpose of this study was to investigate how dietary MKP affect the productivity of leafy vegetables in the HBFT-AP using Japanese eel and the hematological characteristics of the fish fed either a commercial powdered feed or an extruded pellet with MKP of 2.7%.

Materials and Methods

Experimental diet

The extruded pellet (EP) containing MKP of 2.7% was manufactured at Sajo Dongawon dangjin feed factory (Dangjin, Korea) (Table 1). A commercial powdered feed for Japanese eel was provided by Cargill Agri Purina in Korea. Chemical composition of the diets is shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Ingredient composition of the experimental diets1)
Ingredient Mash1) EP
Fish meal (Alaska) - 60.02
Blood meal - 4.00
Squid liver powder - 1.00
Wheat flour - 19.10
Dried yeast - 1.00
Fish oil - 8.21
Choline-liquid (50%) - 0.30
Liquid methionine (71.7%) - 0.02
Lecithin - 1.00
Limestone-S - 1.00
MKP - 2.70
Salt - 0.30
Organic Fe - 0.50
Vitamin C - 0.10
Vitamin E - 0.10
Vitamin Mix2) - 0.50
Mineral Mix3) - 0.10
Antioxidant (BHA) - 0.05

1) Mash, commercial powdered feed (closed formulation) provided by Cargill Agri Purina, Korea; EP, extruded pellet manufactured by Sajo Dongawon, Korea.

2) Vitamin added to supply the following (per kg diet): vitamin A, 22,000 IU; vitamin D3, 4,400 IU; vitamin E, 320 IU; vitamin K3, 24 mg; thiamine HCl, 50 mg; riboflavin, 60 mg; D-Ca pantothenate, 120 mg; biotin, 2 mg; folic acid, 20 mg; vitamin B12, 100 mg; niacin, 300 mg; pyridoxine HCl, 30 mg; inositol, 600 mg; ethoxyquin, 67 mg.

3) Mineral added to supply the following (per kg diet): copper sulfate (25.4% Cu), 10 mg; zinc sulfate (22.7% Zn), 60 mg; manganous sulfate (32.5% Mn), 50 mg; magnesium sulfate (24.3% Mg), cobalt chloride (24.8% Co), 2 mg; potassium iodide (76.4% I), 2.0 mg; sodium selenite (45.6% Se), 0.75 mg.

MKP, monobasic potassium phosphate; BHA, butyl hydroxyl anisole.

Download Excel Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of the experimental diets
Composition (%) Mash EP
Moisture (%) 6.56 3.95
Crude protein (%) 51.70 47.27
Crude lipid (%) 5.01 12.60
Crude ash (%) 12.81 16.37
Crude fiber (%) 0.44 0.67
Ca (%) 3.81 4.67
P (%) 2.11 3.02
Mg (ppm) 1,018.13 1,932.09
Fe (ppm) 402.19 542.26
Cu (ppm) 4.43 12.23
Mn (ppm) 16.60 29.84
Zn (ppm) 222.28 105.73
K (ppm) 5,243.51 8,774.59

Values are means of 2 determinations: Mash, commercial powdered feed; EP, extruded pellet.

Download Excel Table
Experimental system configuration and operation

The experimental production system of two cultivations, aquaponics and hydroponics is shown in Fig. 1. HBFT-AP, which combines modified BFT aquaculture with hydroponic cultivation facilities, was composed of one fish tank ( 4.5 m × H 0.7 m), one sump tank (L 2 .0 m × W 1.0 m × H 0.9 m), two-layered plant bed (L 2.9 m × W 0.6 m × H 0.1 m), one bio-helix filter (680 L, Isan M Tech., Daejeon, Korea) and one pump (1.5 HP) for water circulation in the fish tank, sump tank and plant bed. Oxygen was provided by venturi air supply system and fluorescent lamps (40 ea) for light supply were installed on the first floor of the plant bed. Leafy vegetables cultivation porters consisted of a total of 900 sites with 45 sites per plant bed, and a 25 mm PVC pipe for water supply and a 40 mm PVC pipe for water drainage were employed to aquaponics plant bed. Finally a 100 mm PVC pipe was used to collect plant cultivation water and flow back into the fish tank. The hydroponic system as a control group consisted of one raw water tank (1 ton), one nutrient solution automatic regulator (Nutrient system Agronic 54 model, Hangaramponics, Sangju, Korea), three nutrient solution (A, B, and C solution) container (0.1 ton per one container), one sump tank (L 1.0 m × W 0.5 m × H 1 m), and one circulation pump (1.5 HP) to supply nutrient solution to the plant bed. The composition of the culture solution for each nutrient container is shown in Table 3.

fas-24-7-260-g1
Fig. 1. Compartments and water flow of the experimental design. (A) HBFT-AP (hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics) system: fish tank ( 4.5 m) → sump tank (2 × 1 m) → pump (1.5 HP) → biohelix filter (680 L) → vegetable bed (2.9 × 0.6 × 0.1 m, No. 20) → fish tank; (B) HP (hydroponics): nutrient solution tank→ pump (1 HP) → sump tank (1 × 0.5 × 1 m) → pump (1.5 HP) → vegetable bed (2.9 × 0.6 × 0.1 m, No. 20) → sump tank.
Download Original Figure
Table 3. Chemical composition of nutrient solution for growth of leafy vegetables in HP
Nutrient tank Nutrient Weight (g)
A solution tank (0.1 ton) KNO3 2,525
Ca(NO3)2 ∙ 4H2O 3,540
Fe-EDTA 160
B solution tank (0.1 ton) KNO3 2,525
MgSO4 ∙ 7H2O 1,850
H3BO3 30
MnSO4 ∙ 5H2O 877
ZnSO4 ∙ 7H2O 0.9
CuSO4 ∙ 5H2O 0.4
Na2MoO4 ∙ 2H2O 0.13
NaCl 16.4
C solution tank (0.1 ton) NH4H2PO4 1,380

HP, hydroponics.

Download Excel Table
Experimental fish and design

Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) of 367 with a mean body weight of 224 g were purchased from a fish farm located in Gyeonggi-province. Fish were adapted to a rearing tank of the experimental station for 1 month, during which they were fed the experimental EP diet, and then moved to the rearing tank ( 4.5 m × H 0.7 m) of the HBFT-AP. After a 24 hour fasting before the trial, total and individual weights of 50 sampled fish were measured. A type of dough made by mixing the powdered feed (Mash) with water at the ratio of 2:1 was supplied to the experimental fish for first 6 weeks (Exp1) and then switched to EP for subsequent 6 weeks (Exp2). Feeding rate (% dry diet) of two diets was restricted to around 0.5% per fish body weight once a day to exclude an errors in plant productivity due to unconsumed feed. EP was distributed using a belt feed feeder (Fig. 2).

fas-24-7-260-g2
Fig. 2. Feeding of Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica for each experimental period. (A) feeding platform to provide a dough made by mixing commercial powdered feed with water (1st – 6th weeks), (B) belt type feeder (7th – 12th weeks) to provide extruded pellet.
Download Original Figure
Experimental leafy vegetables and design

Leafy vegetables of 8 cultivar were employed in the experiment, which were grown in a greenhouse for nursery at GARES (Gyeonggi-province Agricultural REsearch and Extension services). Growth trial of the leafy vegetables (Exp1, 3rd to 6th weeks and Exp2, 9th to12th weeks) was conducted 2 weeks after feeding trial considering the adaptation to each experimental diet for fish. Five cultivar of multi green lettuce (Lactuca sativa), multi red lettuce (Lactuca sativa), Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris), abata lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and red romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and five cultivar of multi green lettuce (Lactuca sativa), red lettuce (Lactuca sativa), haetsal-jeokchukmyeon lettuce (Lactuca sativa), abata lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and da-cheong-chae (Brassica campestris) were employed in Exp1 and Exp2, respectively. The leafy vegetables stocked in Exp1 were removed on the last day of the 8th week of the Exp2, and new leafy vegetables were stocked on the first day of the 9th week. Each of the HBFT-AP and HP groups was stocked with 900 individuals (180 individuals per cultivar), and productivity of the plants was compared 23 days after stocking.

Sample measurement

Experimental fish measurement was performed at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. Following one day fasting, the total body weight and number of fish were measured using an electronic scale (BW-1N, CAS, Yangju, Korea) after stocking at a temporarily installed net in the rearing tank. After the measurement, 50 fish were randomly sampled and anesthetized with clove oil (C8392-100mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Individual fish weight of the sampled fish was measured to find out the variation in total fish weight for experimental period. For each of leafy vegetables in Exp1 and Exp2, 12 specimens were randomly selected per leafy vegetable type, and measured by subdividing the stem, leaf number, leaf weight, root, and leaf length, respectively.

Water quality management

The method of water quality management reported by Lee et al. (2019a, b) was applied to this experiment. For the first week of feeding trial, glucose as an external organic carbon source was added to the sump tank in the HBFT-AP system together with a beneficial microorganisms (BFT-ST, EgeeTech, Irvine, CA, USA) blended of Bacillus subtilis, B. amuloliquefaciens, B. licheniformis, Cellumomona sp., Cellulomanas biazotea, Pseudomonas stutzeri, P. denitrificans, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, Nitrobacter winogradskyi and Nitrosomonas euro¬paea. Glucose inputs (650 g per 1 kg diet) were calculated along with feed supply following the methods described in Emerenciano et al. (2017). After the supply of the organic carbon was suspended, CO2 gas as an inorganic carbon source was supplied to the sump tank until the pH fell below 6.0 for two weeks. Microorganisms were added when NO2-N increased by more than 0.1 ppm and stopped when water quality maintained stable. The water containing the nutrient solution in the HP decreased due to natural evaporation and absorption of plants, thus was added from the nutrient solution supplier to the sump tank according to the decreased amount of water and nutrient solution. Water eluted from oyster shell fossils was supplied to prevent a drop in pH according to the accumulation of nutrient solution concentration in the sump tank, and the pH maintained at the range of 5–6.

Water quality analysis

Water quality [DO (mg/L), pH, water temperature (°C), electrical conductivity (EC; μs/cm), turbidity (NTU), TAN (NH3 + NH4+) (mg /L), NO2-N (mg/L), NO3-N (mg/L) and PO4-P (mg/L)] was measured 6 times a week. For DO, pH, water temperature, EC and turbidity, YSI PRODSS (YSI, Yellow Spring, OH, USA) was used, and TAN, NO2-N, NO3-N, and PO4-P were analyzed by colorimetric method using reagents (NitraVer®X Reagent Set 2605345-KR, Low Range Ammonia Reagent Set 2604545-KR, NitriVerⓡ3 Reagent Set 2608345-KR and PhosVerⓡ3 Phosphater Reagent, HACH, Loveland, CO, USA) and the water quality analyzer DR5000 (HACH). In addition, trace elements in water of two systems, the HBFT-AP and HP, were analyzed: K (mg/L), Ca (mg/L), Mg (mg/L), Na (mg/L), Fe (mg/L), Zn (mg/L), Mn (mg/L) and Cu (mg/L) using an inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometer (ICP-OES Optima 8300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, USA), and Cl (mg/L) and SO4 (mg/L) using ion chromatography (930 Comact IC Flex, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland).

Fish blood analysis

At the end of each fish feeding trial in HBFT-AP (Exp1 and Exp2), fish were fasted for 24 hours to investigate the changes in the blood characteristic. Anesthesia was performed with clove oil (C8392-100mL, Sigma-Aldrich), then the blood was sampled from the caudal vein of fish (each of 10 fish from two diet groups) with a 5 cc syringe treated with heparin sodium salt from porcine intestinal mucosa (K3333-10KU, Sigma-Aldrich) for each test group (Mash and EP). Whole blood was analyzed for hemoglobin (Hb, g/dL) and hematocrit (PCV, %), and then blood plasma were obtained after centrifugation (Centrifuge 5415 R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with conditions set at 4°C, 6,500×g, and 10 minutes. PCV (%) was analyzed using HAEMATOKRIT 210 (Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany). And other blood elements such as hemoglobin (Hb, g/dL), plasma glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT; U/L), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT; U/L), glucose (GLU; mg/dL), inorganic phosphorus (Pi; mg/dL), Na (mEq/L), K (mEq/L) and Cl (mEq/L) were analyzed using a blood chemical analyzer (DRI-CHEM 3500 I, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) with commercial clinical investigation kit (Fuji DRI-CHEM slide, Fuji Photo Film).

Statistical analysis

Data (blood parameters, number of leaves, leaf weight and leaf length) obtained from fish and leafy vegetables growth experiment of Exp1 and Exp2 were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA of the SPSS Version 10 program, and the significance level of statistical analysis was determined at 5% (p < 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test (Duncan, 1955).

Results

Water quality analysis

The changes in water quality of the hybrid BFT aquaponic system (HBFT-AP) using microorganisms (heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria) during the 12-week experimental period are shown in Table 4. In Exp1 (first 6 weeks), the average values measured 6 times a week were varied from 8.16 to 8.62 mg/L for DO, from 24.0 to 25.3°C for water temperature, from 167.4 to 335.6 μs/cm for EC, from 5.81 to 8.21 for pH, from 0.82 to 2.53 for turbidity (NTU), from 0.18 to 1.22 mg/L for TAN, from 0.018 to 0.185 mg/L for nitrite (NO2-N), from 2.89 to 26.77 mg/L for nitrate (NO3-N), and from 0.80 to 4.98 mg/L for phosphate (PO4-P). In Exp2 (second 6 weeks), the average values were varied from 8.04 to 8.41 mg/L for DO, from 23.8 to 26.0°C for water temperature, from 337.4 to 440.1 μs/cm for EC, from 5.53 to 5.66 for pH, from 0.45 to 1.20 for turbidity (NTU), from 2.11 to 4.15 mg/L for TAN, from 0.008 to 0.018 mg/L for nitrite (NO2-N), from 24.35 to 33.98 mg/L for nitrate (NO3-N), and from 4.24 to 4.94 mg/L for phosphate (PO4-P).

Table 4. Change of water quality (DO, pH, temperature, EC, turbidity, TAN, NO2-N, NO3-N and PO4-P) in HBFT-AP for 12 weeks
Diet Week DO (mg/L) pH Temperature (°C) EC (μs/cm) Turbidity (NTU) TAN (mg/L) NO2-N (mg/L) NO3-N (mg/L) PO4-P (mg/L)
Mash initial 8.94 8.42 25.8 159.8 0.4 0.13 0.082 3.49 1.07
1 8.62 ± 0.40 8.21 ± 0.12 24.0 ± 2.3 167.4 ± 6.9 2.53 ± 0.77 1.14 ± 0.86 0.185 ± 0.091 2.89 ± 0.22 0.80 ± 0.36
2 8.33 ± 0.18 7.27 ± 0.42 25.3 ± 1.0 230.9 ± 16.8 1.20 ± 0.57 0.18 ± 0.06 0.118 ± 0.047 14.36 ± 2.24 4.47 ± 0.34
3 8.17 ± 0.24 6.29 ± 0.28 25.2 ± 1.0 286.9 ± 11.6 0.95 ± 0.17 0.36 ± 0.80 0.042 ± 0.025 20.50 ± 0.81 4.78 ± 0.11
4 8.16 ± 0.28 6.18 ± 0.16 25.3 ± 1.1 316.8 ± 8.4 0.82 ± 0.24 0.60 ± 0.41 0.031 ± 0.014 24.70 ± 0.54 4.98 ± 0.07
5 8.58 ± 0.28 5.95 ± 0.03 24.8 ± 0.6 320.7 ± 1.1 1.73 ± 0.21 1.18 ± 0.21 0.021 ± 0.008 25.37 ± 0.35 4.87 ± 0.10
6 8.44 ± 0.44 5.81 ± 0.11 25.0 ± 1.3 335.6 ± 2.3 1.80 ± 0.17 1.22 ± 0.05 0.018 ± 0.002 26.77 ± 0.83 4.46 ± 0.72
EP 7 8.24 ± 0.08 5.53 ± 0.04 24.8 ± 0.7 337.4 ± 5.0 0.90 ± 0.14 2.11 ± 0.03 0.008 ± 0.000 24.35 ± 0.07 4.24 ± 0.21
8 8.32 ± 0.08 5.66 ± 0.11 23.8 ± 0.0 343.5 ± 13.3 1.20 ± 0.00 2.44 ± 0.21 0.018 ± 0.001 24.50 ± 0.99 4.29 ± 1.21
9 8.04 ± 0.12 5.57 ± 0.20 26.0 ± 0.1 352.8 ± 0.21 0.45 ± 0.21 2.19 ± 0.18 0.012 ± 0.008 26.90 ± 0.14 4.29 ± 0.78
10 8.41 ± 0.06 5.64 ± 0.14 24.0 ± 0.3 383.5 ± 12.9 0.95 ± 0.10 3.11 ± 0.06 0.012 ± 0.004 28.45 ± 0.24 4.84 ± 0.28
11 8.06 ± 0.19 5.53 ± 0.07 25.6 ± 1.1 422.2 ± 8.4 1.06 ± 0.37 3.14 ± 0.04 0.014 ± 0.001 31.82 ± 1.39 4.93 ± 0.19
12 8.12 ± 0.16 5.57 ± 0.04 25.6 ± 1.0 440.1 ± 6.8 0.48 ± 0.10 4.15 ± 0.02 0.014 ± 0.002 33.98 ± 1.39 4.94 ± 0.30

Values represent the means ± SD of the values for 7 days.

EC, electrical conductivity; TAN, total ammonia nitrogen; HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics; Mash, commercial powdered feed; EP, extruded pellet.

Download Excel Table

The changes in water quality of the hydroponic system (HP) using nutrient solution during the 12-week experimental period are shown in Table 5. Operation of the HP system began the following week after running the HBFT-AP system. In Exp1 (2nd to 6th weeks), the average values measured 6 times a week were varied from 8.84 to 9.18 mg/L for DO, from 21.1 to 23.7°C for water temperature, from 674.5 to 966.3 μs/cm for EC, from 5.42 to 5.89 for pH, from 0.50 to 1.16 for turbidity (NTU), from 0.18 to 4.65 mg/L for TAN, from 0.006 to 0.019 mg/L for nitrite (NO2-N), from 33.17 to 47.97 mg/L for nitrate (NO3-N), and from 14.89 to 15.97 mg/L for phosphate (PO4-P). In Exp2 (7th to 12th weeks), the average values were varied from 9.07 to 9.84 mg/L for DO, from 22.1 to 23.2°C for water temperature, from 762.5 to 1,320.8 μs/cm for EC, from 5.32 to 6.06 for pH, from 0.95 to 1.60 for turbidity (NTU), from 0.00 to 3.28 mg/L for TAN, from 0.005 to 0.050 mg/L for nitrite (NO2-N), from 38.80 to 55.48 mg/L for nitrate (NO3-N), and from 13.35 to 15.26 mg/L for phosphate (PO4-P).

Table 5. Change of water quality (DO, pH, temperature, EC, turbidity, TAN, NO2-N, NO3-N and PO4-P) in HP for 12 weeks
Week DO (mg/L) pH Temperature (°C) EC (μs/cm) Turbidity (NTU) TAN (mg/L) NO2-N (mg/L) NO3-N (mg/L) PO4-P (mg/L)
1 Not measured
2 9.11 ± 0.17 5.89 ± 0.44 21.1 ± 1.0 821.4 ± 32.6 0.98 ± 0.21 4.65 ± 0.74 0.016 ± 0.006 47.93 ± 0.68 15.95 ± 0.07
3 9.04 ± 0.21 5.60 ± 0.70 22.4 ± 1.5 746.8 ± 16.2 1.16 ± 0.14 4.00 ± 0.68 0.019 ± 0.008 47.52 ± 0.71 14.89 ± 1.30
4 8.84 ± 0.19 5.42 ± 0.20 22.0 ± 0.7 674.5 ± 19.8 0.96 ± 0.08 0.54 ± 0.18 0.018 ± 0.011 43.63 ± 1.94 15.97 ± 1.08
5 8.90 ± 0.13 5.45 ± 0.39 23.7 ± 1.0 681.0 ± 57.9 0.50 ± 0.32 0.18 ± 0.17 0.006 ± 0.002 33.17 ± 2.66 14.99 ± 0.64
6 9.18 ± 0.26 5.42 ± 0.99 23.5 ± 1.2 966.3 ± 11.0 0.73 ± 0.25 1.00 ± 0.27 0.016 ± 0.021 47.97 ± 0.57 15.33 ± 0.22
7 9.20 ± 0.09 5.82 ± 0.01 23.1 ± 1.1 907.5 ± 7.8 1.50 ± 0.49 0.19 ± 0.25 0.022 ± 0.001 38.80 ± 0.14 14.78 ± 0.06
8 9.56 ± 0.07 6.06 ± 0.07 22.7 ± 0.6 762.5 ± 26.2 0.95 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.00 0.015 ± 0.008 39.42 ± 0.94 13.35 ± 1.88
9 9.10 ± 0.04 5.82 ± 0.08 23.2 ± 0.0 962.0 ± 8.5 1.60 ± 0.51 3.28 ± 0.06 0.036 ± 0.005 41.60 ± 3.11 15.26 ± 1.05
10 9.84 ± 0.22 5.32 ± 0.33 22.5 ± 1.2 1,108.0 ± 72.4 1.15 ± 0.24 2.71 ± 0.50 0.050 ± 0.024 52.13 ± 1.22 13.88 ± 1.75
11 9.07 ± 0.66 5.49 ± 0.54 22.1 ± 3.9 1,265.8 ± 44.3 1.26 ± 0.22 0.42 ± 0.35 0.005 ± 0.001 55.48 ± 1.63 14.87 ± 0.38
12 9.11 ± 0.39 5.84 ± 0.35 22.4 ± 2.3 1,320.8 ± 28.2 1.23 ± 0.13 0.14 ± 0.10 0.006 ± 0.001 49.23 ± 5.22 14.47 ± 0.29

Values represent the mean ± SD of the values for 7 days.

HP, hydroponics; EC, electrical conductivity; TAN, total ammonia nitrogen.

Download Excel Table
Growth of leafy vegetables in HBFT-AP and HP for EXP1 and EXP2

The productivity of leafy vegetables between HBFT-AP and HP culture systems is shown in Tables 6, 7 and Fig. 3. In Exp1, five kinds of leafy vegetables (multi-green lettuce, multi-red lettuce, Swiss chard, abata lettuce, red romaine lettuce) were cultivated for 23 days after stocking, and then growth was compared (Table 6). There was no significant difference in the averages of leaf number (No), leaf weight (g), and leaf length (cm) (p > 0.05), except for leaf length (HBFT-AP, 29.12 ± 3.38; HP, 23.05 ± 3.05 cm) of Swiss chard cultivar (p < 0.05). In the case of multi-green and multi-red lettuce, investigation for leaf number was not performed because it was difficult to identify the individual of the leaf due to the characteristics of cultivar (Fig. 3). In Exp2, five kinds of leafy vegetables (multi-green lettuce, red lettuce, haetsal –jeokchukmyeon lettuce, abata lettuce, da-cheong-chae) were cultivated for 23 days after stocking, and then growth was measured (Table 7). Cultivars showing the difference in leaf length (cm) were red lettuce (HBFT-AP, 25.39 ± 2.03; HP, 21.93 ± 1.23) and haetsal –jeokchukmyeon lettuce (HBFT-AP, 19.08 ± 1.67; HP, 15.33 ± 0.85) (p < 0.05), and leaf weight (g) of abata lettuce showed a significant difference between HBFT-AP (89.67 ± 11.33 g) and HP (63.61 ± 13.15 g) (p < 0.05). In Exp2, there was no significant difference in the averaged values of leaf number (No), leaf weight (g), and leaf length (cm) (p > 0.05), except for the three cases mentioned above.

Table 6. Growth of five leafy vegetables in HBFT-AP and HP for 23 days (Exp1)
Cultivar (n = 12) Growth factor Initial Culture method
HBFT-AP HP
Multi green (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 0.78 0.99
Leaf no. - - -
Leaf weight (g) 1.49 ± 0.32 56.15 ± 11.76ns 74.83 ± 12.01
Root mean weight (g) 0.23 3.98 5.20
Leaf length (cm) 3.27 ± 0.14 14.64 ± 0.73ns 15.98 ± 1.39
Multi red (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 0.69 0.76
Leaf no. - - -
Leaf weight (g) 1.54 ± 0.26 53.93 ± 7.56ns 45.05 ± 6.18
Root mean weight (g) 0.37 2.70 2.76
Leaf length (cm) 3.84 ± 0.41 15.23 ± 0.61ns 14.48 ± 0.71
Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris) Stem mean weight (g) - 0.88 0.78
Leaf no. 4.25 ± 0.35 29.12 ± 3.38* 23.05 ± 3.05
Leaf weight (g) 2.58 ± 0.46 92.70 ± 14.94ns 81.43 ± 13.66
Root mean weight (g) 0.28 2.48 3.98
Leaf length (cm) 4.54 ± 0.26 26.75±2.30ns 23.54±2.46
Abata lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 1.44 1.72
Leaf no. 6.85 ± 0.41 20.50 ± 1.78ns 18.33 ± 1.30
Leaf weight (g) 2.72 ± 0.18 76.90 ± 8.88ns 77.79 ± 8.72
Root mean weight (g) 0.41 3.67 5.84
Leaf length (cm) 6.84 ± 0.51 22.43 ± 1.48ns 24.17 ± 0.71
Red romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 1.63 0.88
Leaf no. 5.24 ± 0.32 21.33 ± 1.67ns 19.08 ± 1.38
Leaf weight (g) 3.98 ± 0.27 70.81 ± 5.00ns 72.61 ± 9.40
Root mean weight (g) 0.39 5.32 2.48
Leaf length (cm) 6.72 ± 0.63 28.97 ± 0.68 ns 30.08 ± 0.80

Values (means ± SD of sampled leafy vegetables) with * superscripts in the same line are significantly different (p < 0.05). HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics; HP, hydroponics; ns, nonsignificant.

Download Excel Table
Table 7. Growth of five leafy vegetables in HBFT-AP and HP for 23 days (Exp2)
Cultivar (n = 12) Growth factor Initial Culture method
HBFT-AP HP
Multi green (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 0.66 0.78
Leaf no. - - -
Leaf weight (g) 1.39 ± 0.27 58.61 ± 9.51ns 47.76 ± 13.67
Root mean weight (g) 0.18 5.42 5.54
Leaf length (cm) 3.08 ± 0.09 16.30 ± 1.08ns 13.87 ± 1.26
Red lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 1.18 0.95
Leaf no. 3.86 ± 0.24 15.33 ± 1.72ns 14.67 ± 1.72
Leaf weight (g) 2.62 ± 0.18 48.89 ± 6.26ns 39.08 ± 7.41
Root mean weight (g) 0.28 4.11 3.68
Leaf length (cm) 4.72 ± 0.38 25.39 ± 2.03* 21.93 ± 1.23
Haetsal Jeokchukmyeon (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 1.36 1.25
Leaf no. 5.34 ± 0.68 10.58 ± 2.31ns 9.33 ± 0.65
Leaf weight (g) 3.02 ± 0.25 56.98 ± 16.60ns 43.31 ± 9.07
Root mean weight (g) 0.18 4.51 4.40
Leaf length (cm) 6.42 ± 0.58 19.08 ± 1.67* 15.33 ± 0.85
Abata lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Stem mean weight (g) - 1.62 1.36
Leaf no. 6.12 ± 0.28 14.42 ± 0.79ns 13.75 ± 1.36
Leaf weight (g) 2.05 ± 0.26 89.67 ± 11.33* 63.61 ± 13.15
Root mean weight (g) 0.29 4.20 7.27
Leaf length (cm) 5.42 ± 0.24 21.69 ± 1.07ns 19.04 ± 1.56
Da cheong chae (Brassica campestris) Stem mean weight (g) - 1.10 1.08
Leaf no. 3.89 ± 0.42 10.67 ± 1.72ns 10.33 ± 1.50
Leaf weight (g) 3.12 ± 0.22 73.92 ± 17.55ns 65.24 ± 26.29
Root mean weight (g) 0.16 3.14 4.86
Leaf length (cm) 5.24 ± 0.38 28.84 ± 1.79 ns 27.62 ± 2.33

Values (means ± SD of sampled leafy vegetables) with * superscripts in the same line are significantly different (p < 0.05)

HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics; HP, hydroponics; ns, nonsignificant.

Download Excel Table
fas-24-7-260-g3
Fig. 3. Growth of leafy vegetables in HP and HBFT-AP for 12 weeks. (A) Exp1, (B) Exp2, (C) multi green and multi red lettuce cultivar. HP, hydroponics; HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics.
Download Original Figure
Analysis of important nutrients in HBFT-AP and HP culture water

The results of trace elements [K (mg/L), Ca (mg/L), Mg (mg/L), Na (mg/L), Cl (mg/L), SO4 (mg/L), Fe (mg/L), Zn (mg/L), Mn (mg/L) and Cu (mg/L)] in HBFT-AP and HP culture water were shown in Table 8. During the 12-week experimental period, all nutrients except Cl ions were higher in HP than in HBFT-AP. Among the nutrients in HBFT-AP culture water analyzed in the last week of Exp1 (Mash) and Exp2 (EP), six nutrients (K, Ca, Mg, Na, Cl, and SO4) were lower in Exp1 than in Exp2.

Table 8. Nutrient concentrations in HBFT-AP and HP at the end of the trial
Water quality parameter
(mg/L)
HBFT-AP HP
Mash (1–6 wk) EP (7–12 wk)
K 2.9 9.6 52.0
Ca 45.6 67.4 147.8
Mg 5.0 6.5 33.6
Na 13.6 16.8 33.4
Cl 12.0 17.0 10.0
SO4 20.0 27.0 84.0
Fe 0.0743 0.0610 2.0090
Zn 0.6900 0.3320 0.6917
Mn 0.0090 0.0010 0.1021
Cu 0.0170 0.0130 0.9066

Values are means of 2 determinations.

HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics; HP, hydroponics; Mash, commercial powdered feed; EP, extruded pellet.

Download Excel Table
Fish growth through two experimental diets (Mash and EP)

Compared to fish fed Mash (Exp1), fish fed EP (Exp2) exhibited improvement in weight gain (WG; 11.20% vs 16.93%), feed efficiency (FE; 30.45% vs 42.91%), specific growth rate (SGR; 0.25% vs 0.37%) and protein efficiency ratio (PER; 0.55 vs 0.86), although daily feed intake (%/av.wt/d) and survival rate (%) were similar (Table 9).

Table 9. Growth performance of Japanese eel in HBFT-AP for 12 weeks1)
Growth performance Diet
Mash (1–6 wk) EP (7–12 wk)
Initial fish No. 367 361
Final fish No. 361 357
Initial weight of total fish (g) 82,130 91,320
Final weight of total fish (g) 91,320 106,780
Initial average (n = 50) weight of total fish (g) 225.5 ± 20.7 249.7 ± 21.6
Final average (n = 50) weight of total fish (g) 249.7 ± 21.6 296.9 ± 24.3
Feed intake(g, DM) 30,199 36,026
WG (%)2) 11.20 16.93
FE (%)3) 30.45 42.91
SGR (%)4) 0.25 0.37
PER5) 0.55 0.86
DFI6) 0.57 0.58
Survival rate (%)7) 98.2 98.9

1) HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics; Mash, commercial powdered feed; EP, extruded pellet.

2) Weight gain (%) = [final weight (g) – initial weight (g)] × 100/initial weight (g).

3) Feed efficiency (%) = [wet weight gain (g)/dry feed intake] × 100.

4) Specific growth rate (%) = [Ln final weight (g) – Ln initial weight (g)] / experimental days × 100.

5) Protein efficiency ratio = wet weight gain (g) / protein intake.

6) Daily feed intake (%/av. wt/d) = dry feed intake (g/fish) / [(initial wt + final wt + dead fish wt) / 2] / experimental days × 100.

7) Survival rate (%) = final fish number / initial fish number × 100.

WG, weight gain; FE, feed efficiency; SGR, specific growth rate.

Download Excel Table
Fish blood analysis

Hematological characteristics of Japanese eel fed two different diets (Mash and EP) are given in Table 10. In whole blood analysis, PCV was significantly different (p < 0.05) between two groups fed Mash (33.20 ± 2.86 %) and EP (38.60 ± 2.46 %). However, the difference was not found in Hb (hemoglobin) values between two groups fed Mash (11.39 ± 0.94 g/dL) and EP (12.82 ± 0.55 g/dL). Blood plasma analysis did not show any significant differences (p > 0.05) except for the parameters of Pi (mg/dL) and K (mEq/L) between two groups: GOT (U/L), 62.00 ± 18.47 vs 63.50 ± 8.46; GPT (U/L), 5.00 ± 2.27 vs 7.20 ± 1.14, GLU (mg/dL), 84.90 ± 11.58 vs 67.60 ± 12.08, Pi (mg/dL), 5.50 ± 0.90 vs 7.04 ± 0.21, Na (mEq/L), 149.70 ± 4.27 vs 148.20 ± 2.86, K (mEq/L), 1.95 ± 0.44 vs 2.80 ± 0.47, and Cl (mEq/L), 145.10 ± 4.82 vs 148.40 ± 2.67.

Table 10. Hematological analysis of Japanese eel in HBFT-AP1)
Blood parameters Diet
Mash (1–6 wk) EP (7–12 wk)
Average fish weight (n = 4) 232.20 ± 38.96ns 299.80 ± 18.05
PCV (%) 33.20 ± 2.86* 38.60 ± 2.46
Hb (g/dL) 11.39 ± 0.94ns 12.82 ± 0.55
GOT (U/L) 62.00 ± 18.47 ns 63.50 ± 8.46
GPT (U/L) 5.00 ± 2.27ns 7.20 ± 1.14
GLU (mg/dL) 84.90 ± 11.58ns 67.60 ± 12.08
Pi (mg/dL) 5.50 ± 0.90* 7.04 ± 0.21
Na (mEq/L) 149.70 ± 4.27ns 148.20 ± 2.86
K (mEq/L) 1.95 ± 0.44* 2.80 ± 0.47
Cl (mEq/L) 145.10 ± 4.82ns 148.40 ± 2.67

1) Values (means ± SD of four individuals) with * superscripts in the same line are significantly different (p < 0.05).

HBFT-AP, hybrid biofloc technology-aquaponics; Mash, commercial powdered feed; EP, extruded pellet; ns, nonsignificant; PCV, hematocrit; Hb, hemoglobin; GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT, glutamic pyruvic transaminase; GLU, glucose; Pi, inorganic phosphorus; Mash, commercial powdered feed; CP, crude protein.

Download Excel Table

Discussion

The HBFT-AP proposed by Lee et al. (2019a, 2019b) was applied in this study. After a successful attempt of the HBFT-AP at the semi-pilot scale (Lee et al. 2019b), Lee et al. (2019a) reported the higher productivity of leafy vegetables in the system using catfish than in a circulating hydroponics from field test.

Although Bittsanszky et al. (2016) reported that nutrient levels change depending on the density of fish, but nitrates are sufficiently generated in the aquaponic system, it is commonly accepted that P, Ca, Fe, and K are largely deficient for optimal growth of plants (Rakocy, 2007). According to Lee & Lee (2014), after the discovery of Arthrobacter sp. performing the heterotrophic nitrification process in 1972, many studies on the process have been conducted. Researchers have discovered a variety of heterotrophic nitrifying microorganisms with nitrification activity in soil, sludge, lake water, and the deep sea (Spiller et al., 1976). In the heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification processes, two reactions can occur in one reactor at the same time. As well, the change in pH in the reactor is kept in a balanced manner during the denitrification process, thereby inhibiting the acidification process occurring in the nitrification process. Since the end products and substrates of heterotrophic nitrification are diverse, there is an advantage that the range of application and mixed culture of various types of microorganisms can be broadly expanded (Marazioti et al., 2003). The heterotrophic nitrification process of T. pantotropha requires energy and unlike autotrophic nitrifying bacteria, the bacteria does not accumulate NO2-N when ammonia is oxidized under aerobic conditions (Robertson et al., 1988). In addition, Kim et al. (2005) reported that Bacillus strains predominantly inhabit the systems that treat contaminated water, and effectively remove organic matter other than nitrogen and phosphorus. Currently, researches on BFT method using heterotrophic bacteria to the aquaponic production system are being attempted (Emerenciano et al., 2017), but many microorganisms formed during the process attach to the plant roots to form a biofilm, which has been pointed out as a major factor that inhibits the growth of plants. It is known that a filter and a solids settling device are essential to compensate for the issue (Emerenciano et al., 2017). In Exp1 and Exp2, the BFT method reported by Emerenciano et al. (2017) was applied during the initial one week with a supply of refined glucose as the organic carbon. The daily total ammonia (TAN), nitrite (NO2-N) and nitrate (NO3-N) levels were changed with the amount of organic carbon supplied in HBFT-AP culture water. On the other hand, the level of phosphorus (PO4-P) was similar or lower than that of the initial water (Table 4). In addition, the turbidity was highest due to the proliferation of heterotrophic bacteria, while the pH remained stable during this period. Following the supply of organic carbon for the 1st week, the carbon source was switched to CO2 (inorganic carbon) to increase the activity of the nitrification process of autotrophic bacteria and the carbonic acid concentration in the system. The pH in the system was, then, started to decrease (Table 4). Kim et al. (2005) reported that autotrophic bacteria exert the nitrification stronger than heterotrophic ones and that they are, however, less active at pH 6.0 or less, making it difficult to convert ammonia into nitrite during the process. As a result, nitrate levels no longer increased as indicated by Thorarinsdottir (2015). Differently from those findings, the present study showed the increase of TAN and NO3-N and the stabilization of NO2-N (Table 4). Such a result could be due to the nitrification process performed by three species of heterotrophic bacteria like Bacillus (Bacillus subtilis, B. amuloliquefaciens, B. licheniformis). In water, non-ionized ammonia (NH3) and ammonium (NH4+) equilibrate with pH and temperature, and the sum of the two forms is called TAN (Purwono et al., 2017). Both NH3 and NH4+ can be toxic to fish, but the former is a more toxic form because it is not charged and is fat-soluble, so it passes through biomembrane more easily than the ionized and charged NH4+. In most cases, ammonia nitrogen is recognized to be toxic for farmed fish at concentrations above 1.5 mg/L, but the toxicity threshold level of NH3 is only 0.025 mg/L. It can vary greatly depending on species, fish size, fine solids, refractory organics, surface active compounds, metals, nitrate, salinity and pH (Avnimelech et al., 2015). Japanese eel was able to survive and grow under high TAN concentrations (4.15 mg/L) in the last week of 12 weeks of this experiment. The reason is assumed that most TAN was converted to NH4+ form rather than NH3 at low pH (Purwono et al., 2017), therefore the toxicity of TAN was suppressed.

Protein in fish feed is the most expensive component of energy and essential nutrient for growth. For this reason, the protein requirement is the first to be considered in the formulation of fish feeds (Han et al., 2005). In the case of fish fed a diet that lacks energy compared to protein, feed protein is used as an energy source to meet the energy required for maintenance in the fish body. As a result, PER and growth factor decrease as well as leading to excessive nitrogen excretion (Cai et al., 1996; McGoogan & Gatlin, 1999). Fish fed a diet that contains an excess of energy compared to protein component consume less feed and cannot receive enough other essential nutrients such as protein and amino acids. Eventually, it results in poor growth (McGoogan & Gatlin, 1999). The appropriate protein level in diet for Japanese eel is known to be about 45%–50%, but it can vary depending on fish species, feed composition, experimental design, breeding method and environmental factors such as water temperature and salinity (Degani et al., 1985; De Silva et al., 2008; Keembiyehetty & Wilson, 1998; Nose & Arai, 1973; Tibbetts et al., 2000). Currently, commercial feed for Japanese eel in Korea is a powdered type in which fish meal and gelatinized starch are mixed, and is provided to the fish in a dough form after mixing it with water. Kim et al. (2008) reported that the powdered type feed was less effective than the extruded pellet in spite of the similar protein content because a significant loss of feed could be caused during feeding the dough. In this study, the growth factors (WG, FE, SGR, and PER) of Japanese eel were higher in feeding period of the EP than the Mash (Table 9). The reason might be due to a difference in the actual feed consumption, although the feeding amounts of the two diets were similar at the rate of 0.57% and 0.58% (Table 5). In hematological index measured at the end (6th and 12th week) of feeding of Mash and EP, respectively, the parameters of PCV, inorganic phosphorus and potassium ion (K) showed a significant difference (Table 10). Jeon et al. (2003) reported that the values of PCV (%) and Hb (g/dL) ranged from 31.8% to 42.5% and from 11.1 to 14.0 g/dL for Japanese eel, and were changed according to the size and sex of the fish. Lee et al. (2020) reported that the mean values ranged from 31.25% to 38.50% for PCV (%) and from 11.40 to12.98 g/dL Hb (g/dL) in the hematological analysis of Japanese eel with body weight of 220 g grown in HBFT-AP system. It was also found that the concentration of Pi (mg/dL) and K (mEq/L) in blood plasma was higher in fish group fed diet containing MKP. Lee et al. (2019a, b) reported that the values of PCV (%) and Hb (g/dL) ranged from 45.33% to 47.83% and from 14.03 to15.48 g/dL in Far Eastern catfish weighing 200–300 g grown in HBFT-AP system. PCV and Hb are main indicators of the ability to carry oxygen from blood to each tissue and nutritional anemia in fish. In this study, Japanese eel fed EP showed higher PCV values in the whole blood analysis (Table 10). This could be explained by reinforced oxygen transport capacity required for the metabolic processes of the fish kept in low pH condition in a closed environment, and it might be considered to be the result of the adaptation to the hazardous environment. Lee et al. (2019b) reported that the concentration of Pi (mg/dL) and K (mEq/L) in blood plasma of Far Eastern catfish fed diets containing more than MKP 2.0% was similar. Also, plasma Pi (mg/dL) of Japanese eel fed EP with MKP 2.7% was higher than that of fish fed commercial EP without MKP. In this study, similarly, higher values of Pi (m/dL) and K (mEq/L) were observed in Japanese eel fed EP with MKP 2.7%. These results suggest that dietary MKP increase the plasma Pi (m/dL) and K (mEq/L) of fish.

Hydroponics is divided into two cultures ‘water and medium’ depending on whether or not the medium is used, and into two systems ‘open and closed’ depending on whether or not the culture nutrition solution is reused. In water culture, plants grow with nutrition solution without solid medium supporting the roots of plants. This cultivation method includes deep water culture (DWC), nutrient film technique (NFT), aeroponics, and capillary culture. The HP production system used in the present study was a DWC method, but the height of the plant bed was about 10 to 15 cm, which was lower than that of the bed being conventionally used (Fig. 1). Jang et al. (2017) reported that closed system can minimize environmental pollution by reducing the discharge of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus through reuse of waste nutrient solution, and also improve economic efficiency by sparing the amount of fertilizer and raw water used in the system. Despite these advantages, however, several researchers reported that when the cultivation period is prolonged in closed system, the imbalance of ions in the culture medium becomes serious as the circulation progresses, which negatively affects the growth and yield of crops (Ho & Adams, 1995; Lopez et al., 1996; Zekki et al., 1996). Contrary to those findings, Dhakal et al. (2005) reported that there was no difference in the yield between open and closed systems when cultivating tomatoes using a medium containing 28% organic matter. Based on these contradictory results, it is inferred that the concentration of nutrients absorbed by plants varies depending on drainage components, environmental conditions and growing stages, and that plants maintain their own favorable growth and development by ion selectivity (Abram, 1980). In present study, 8 kinds of leafy vegetables were stocked and cultivated twice (Exp1, 3rd to 6th weeks; Exp2, 9th to 12th weeks) in two systems HBFT-AP and HP, respectively. During the two experimental periods, productivity of leafy vegetables showed a similar (4 kinds of cultivar) or somewhat higher trend (4 kinds of species) in HBFT-AP than in HP (Table 6 and 7). Such a difference between two systems is assumed to be due to the influence of the pH. The value in HP was frequently kept lower than 5.0 in both Exp1 and Exp2, while the value in HBFT maintained at the range around 5.5 for the entire experimental period. In an aquaponic system in which aquatic organisms and plants are cultured and grown together, it is important to maintain the water quality environment of both sides in the appropriate range within the biological limits (FAO, 2014). In general, the pH value of culture water for hydroponics is good from 5.5 to 6.5, and when the value falls below 4.5, alkaline nutrients such as Ca, Mg, and K are insoluble. On the contrary, when the pH is 7 or higher, ferric iron (Fe3+) precipitates and becomes unavailable by plants (Moore, 1974; Islam et al., 1980). In addition, it was reported that the symptom of yellowing leaves symptoms is related to the absorption, transport and function of inorganic ions, and poor development frequently occurs under conditions of inappropriate pH (Findenegg et al., 1986). In the case of fish, it is known that they do not survive below pH 4.0, and do not grow in the range of pH 4.0 to 5.0, so there is no productivity, while at pH 9.0 to 11.0, growth is slow, and at pH 11 or higher, dead individuals appear (Thorarinsdottir, 2015). Lee et al. (2019a, b) reported that a pH range of 5.0 to 6.0 could produce both Far Eastern catfish and leafy vegetables without any problems in HBFT-AP system. Based on the previous and present results, therefore, it could be highlighted that the range of pH 5.5 to 6.0 is an adequate condition for both productivity and survival of both fish and leafy vegetables in the HBFT-AP.

During trials of Exp1 and Exp2, nutrient concentrations except for Cl ions were higher in HP than in HBFT-AP (Table 8). Nevertheless, productivity of leafy vegetables was similar or even lower in HP. This could be explained by the amount of culture water of HBFT-AP, which is much larger than that of HP (HBFT-AP, 16 tons vs HP, 4 tons). Therefore, the quantitative concentration of nutrients did not cause a problem in the growth of leafy vegetables in aquaponics (FAO, 2014). Higher level of calcium ion in both systems was due to the addition of water soaked out of oyster shells to prevent a drop of the pH below 5.0 (Table 8). In growth trial of leaf vegetables in HBFT-AP, higher concentration of potassium ion in culture water during EP feeding period would be originated from fecal dissolution of the ion, because the feed contained MKP of 2.7%.

Conclusion

We investigated that how the commercial powdered diet and an extruded pellet containing MKP affect the productivity of leafy vegetables in the HBFT-AP using Japanese eel. Also, the feasibility of the practical application of HBFT-AP was examined by comparing with HP in terms of the productivity of leafy vegetables. The characteristics of the nitrification process in HBFT-AP for this study were shown as an increase of TAN and NO3-N and a stabilization of NO2-N. It is presumed that such a trend could be achieved by heterotrophic bacteria. Japanese eel fed EP showed higher PCV values in the whole blood analysis and higher values of Pi (m/dL) and K (mEq/L) were observed in plasma. This could be explained by reinforced oxygen transport capacity required for the metabolic processes of the fish kept in low pH condition in a closed environment. And also, dietary MKP might increase the plasma Pi (m/dL) and K (mEq/L). Leafy vegetables in HBFT-AP showed a productivity similar (4 kinds of cultivar) or somewhat higher (4 kinds of cultivar) compared to those in HP. It was suggested that pH in HBFT-AP vary depending on nutrients in the diet, the microorganisms, and CO2 concentration in the culture water, and that if the pH in HBFT-AP is kept at 5.5 to 6.0, nutrient level in the culture water does not exert any adverse effect on plant growth. The low-pH aquaponic system called HBFT-AP would be emerged as a solution to complement the facility cost and operational complexity problems of the RAS-based aquaponics, although more researches remains to be done.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry (IPET) through Agri-Bio industry Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Korea (grant number: 118049-03-2-HD020).

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Abram AS. The selective capacity of plants for ions and its importance for the composition and treatment of the nutrient solution. Acta Hortic. 1980; 98:87-98

2.

Avnimelech Y, De-Schryver P, Emmereciano M, Kuhn D, Ray A, Taw N. Overview of aquaculture systems.In In: Tomasso J, editor.editor Biofloc technology. Baton Rouge, LA: The World Aquaculture Society Press. 2015; p p. 9-20.

3.

Bailey DS, Ferrarezi RS. Valuation of vegetable crops produced in the UVI commercial aquaponic system. Aquacult Rep. 2017; 7:77-82

4.

Bittsanszky A, Uzinger N, Gyulai G, Mathis A, Junge R, Villarroel M, et al. Nutrient supply of plants in aquaponic systems. Ecocycles. 2016; 2:17-20

5.

Cai Y, Wermerskirchen J, Adelman IR. Ammonia excretion rate indicates dietary protein adequacy for fish. Prog Fish Cult. 1996; 58:124-127

6.

Cho SH, Jeong JH, Kim MH, Lee KT, Kim DJ, Kim KH, et al. The effects of temperature on maintaining the stability of water quality in biofloc-based zero-water exchange culture tanks. J Life Sci. 2015; 25:496-506

7.

Degani G, Horowitz A, Levanon D. Effect of protein level in purified diet and of density, ammonia and O2 level on growth of juvenile European eels (Anguilla anguilla L.). Aquaculture. 1985; 46:193-200

8.

De Silva SS, Gunasekera RM, Gooley G, Ingram BA. Growth of Australian shortfin eel (Anguilla australis) elvers given different dietary protein and lipid levels. Aquacult Nutr. 2008; 7:53-57

9.

Dhakal U, Salokhe VM, Tantau HJ, Max J. Development of a greenhouse nutrient recycling system for tomato production in humid tropics. Agric Eng Int CIGR Ejournal. 2005; 7:1-15.

10.

Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955; 11:1-42

11.

Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M, Miranda-Baeza A. Biofoc technology (BFT): a tool for water quality management in aquaculture.In In: Tutu H, editor.editor Water quality. London, UK: IntechOpen. 2017; p p. 91-109

12.

FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. Flow-through and recirculation systems: Report of the working group on terminology, format and units of measurement. Rome: FAO. 1986EIFAC Technical Paper No.: 44.

13.

FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. Small-scale aquaponic food production: integrated fish and plant farming. Rome: FAO. 2014FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No.: 589.

14.

Findenegg GR, van Beusichem ML, Keltjens WG. Proton balance of plants: physiological, agronomical and ecological implications. Neth J Agric Sci. 1986; 34:371-379

15.

Gieling TH, van Straten G, Janssen HJJ, Wouters H. ISE and Chemfet sensors in greenhouse cultivation. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2005; 105:74-80

16.

Gutiérrez M, Alegret S, Cáceres R, Casadesús J, Marfà O, del Valle M. Nutrient solution monitoring in greenhouse cultivation employing a potentiometric electronic tongue. J Agric Food Chem. 2008; 56:1810-1817

17.

Han KM, Bae JY, Eme OO, Go SH, Yoo JH, Bai SC. Evaluation of the optimum dietary protein to energy ratio of juvenile Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. J Aquacult. 2005; 18:135-141.

18.

Ho LC, Adams P. Nutrient uptake and distribution in relation to crop quality. Acta Hortic. 1995; 396:33-44

19.

Islam AKMS, Edwards DG, Asher CJ. pH optima for crop growth. Plant Soil. 1980; 54:339-357

20.

Jang D, Choi KY, Kim IS. Effect of drainage reusing ratio on growth and yield of summer-cultivated paprika in recycling hydroponic cultivation. Protected Hortic. 2017; 26:7-12

21.

Jeon MJ, Han KM, Bae JY, Yoo JH, Lee KA, Bai SC. Serum steroid hormone level and hematological characteristics of one-year cultured eels, Anguilla japonica based on total length and sex. J Aquacult. 2003; 16:267-272.

22.

Keembiyehetty CN, Wilson RP. Effect of water temperature on growth and nutrient utilization of sunshine bass (Morone chrysops ♀×Morone saxatilis ♂) fed diets containing different energy/protein ratios. Aquaculture. 1998; 166:151-162

23.

Kim JD, Kim KS, Song JS, Lee JY, Jeong KS. Optimum level of dietary monocalcium phosphate based on growth and phosphorus excretion of mirror carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture. 1998; 161:337-344

24.

Kim JK, Park KJ, Cho KS, Nam SW, Park TJ, Bajpai R. Aerobic nitrification–denitrification by heterotrophic Bacillus strains. Bioresour Technol. 2005; 96:1897-1906

25.

Kim SW, Rim SK, Sohn SG, Lee J. Comparison of growth and water quality in juvenile Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica fed commercial extruded pellet and paste type diets. J Fish Mar Sci Edu. 2008; 20:90-94.

26.

Kumar RR, Cho JY. Reuse of hydroponic waste solution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014; 21:9569-9577

27.

Lall SP. Digestibility, metabolism and excretion of dietary phosphorus in fish. In In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Nutritional Strategies in Management of Aquaculture Waste 1991; , Guelph, ONp p. 21-36

28.

Lee DH, Kim JY, Lim SR, Kim DY, Kim KB, Kim JM, et al. Comparative study on growth and yield of far Eastern catfish Silurus asotus and leafy vegetables grown in hybrid BFT-aquaponics, semi-RAS and hydroponics. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2019a; 52:482-495.

29.

Lee DH, Kim JY, Lim SR, Kim DY, Kim JM, Shin SJ, et al. Effect of dietary monobasic potassium phosphate levels on water quality and the growth of far Eastern catfish Silurus asotus and four leafy vegetables in a hybrid biofloc technology aquaponic system. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2019b; 52:159-172.

30.

Lee DH, Kim JY, Lim SR, Kim KB, Kim JM, Hariati AM, et al. Effects of crude protein levels in diets containing MKP on water quality and the growth of Japanese eels Anguilla japonica and leafy vegetables in a hybrid BFT-aquaponic system. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2020; 53:606-619.

31.

Lee EY, Lee CW. Isolation and nitrogen removal characteristics of heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrifying bacteria, Stenotrophomonas sp. CW-4Y. Korean Soc Biotechnol Bioeng J. 2014; 29:72-80

32.

Lopez J, Tremblay N, Voogt W, Dubé S, Gosselin A. Effects of varying sulphate concentrations on growth, physiology and yield of the greenhouse tomato. Sci Hortic. 1996; 67:207-217

33.

Losordo TM, Westerman PW, Liehr SK. Water treatment and wastewater generation in intensive recirculating fish production systems. Bull Natl Res Inst Aquacult Suppl. 1994; 1:27-36.

34.

Marazioti C, Kornaros M, Lyberatos G. Kinetic modeling of a mixed culture of Pseudomonas denitrificans and Bacillus subtilis under aerobic and anoxic operating conditions. Water Res. 2003; 37:1239-1251

35.

McGoogan BB, Gatlin DM. Dietary manipulations affecting growth and nitrogenous waste production of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus Ⅰ. effects of dietary protein and energy levels. Aquaculture. 1999; 178:333-348

36.

MOF [Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries]. Fisheries statistics [Internet]. 2019[cited 2020 Aug 11]https://www.fips.go.kr/p/S020304/#

37.

Moore DP. Physiological effects of pH on roots.In In: Carson EW, editor.editor The plant root and its environment. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia. 1974; p p. 135-151.

38.

NIFS [National Institute of Fisheries Science]. 2012 FAO world fisheries trends. Busan, Korea: Hanguel Graphic. 2013; p p. 194-205.

39.

Nose T, Arai S. Optimum level of protein in purified diet for eel, Anguilla japonica. Bull Freshwater Fish Res Lab. 1973; 22:145-155.

40.

Ogino J, Takeuchi L, Takeda H, Watanabe T. Availability of dietary phosphorus in carp and rainbow trout. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish. 1979; 45:1527-1532

41.

Purwono AR, Hibbaan M, Budihardjo MA. Ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) and ammonium-nitrogen (NH4+-N) equilibrium on the process of removing nitrogen by using tubular plastic media. J Mater Environ Sci. 2017; 8:4915-4922.

42.

Rakocy JE. Ten guidelines for aquaponics systems. 10th Anniversary issue. Aquaponics J. 2007; 46:14-17.

43.

Rakocy JE, Masser MP, Losordo TM. Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: aquaponics–integrating fish and plant culture [Internet]. 2006[cited 2020 May 16]https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/319795/oksd_srac_454_2016-07.pdf?sequence=1

44.

Reyes AAD, Lawson TB. Combination of a bead filter and rotating biological contactor in a recirculating fish culture system. Aquacult Eng. 1996; 15:27-39

45.

Robertson LA, van Niel EWJ, Torremans RAM, Kuenen JG. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in aerobic chemostat cultures of Thiosphaera pantotropha. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988; 54:2812-2813

46.

Russo RC, Thurston RV, Emerson K. Acute toxicity of nitrite to rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): effects of pH, nitrite species, and anion species. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1981; 38:387-393

47.

Schneider O, Blancheton JP, Varadi L, Eding EH, Verreth JAJ. Cost price and production strategies in European recirculation systems.In In: Proceedings of the Linking Tradition & Technology Highest Quality for the Consumer 2006, Firenze, Italy

48.

Spiller H, Dietsch E, Kessler E. Intracellular appearance of nitrite and nitrate in nitrogen-starved cells of Ankistrodesmus braunii. Planta. 1976; 129:175-181

49.

Suh KH, Kim BJ, Jeon IG. Design and development of integrated recirculating aquaculture system. J Korean Fish Soc. 2001; 34:70-76.

50.

Thorarinsdottir RI. Aquaponics guidelines. Reykjavik, Iceland: Háskólaprent. 2015.

51.

Tibbetts SM, Lall SP, Anderson DM. Dietary protein requirement of juvenile American eel (Anguilla rostrata) fed practical diets. Aquaculture. 2000; 186:145-155

52.

Zekki H, Gauthier L, Gosselin A. Growth, productivity, and mineral composition of hydroponically cultivated greenhouse tomatoes, with or without nutrient solution recycling. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1996; 121:1082-1088