RESEARCH ARTICLE

Preliminary study on spatio-temporal variations of five giant and 17 large fish species around the Korean peninsula from 2011 to 2016

Jin-Koo Kim1,#,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-406X, Hyung Chul Kim2,#https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0791-9437, Jung-Hwa Ryu3, Ji-Suk Ahn4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4757-6192
Author Information & Copyright
1Division of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
2Fisheries Resources and Environment Research Division, West Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Incheon 22383, Korea
3Ryujunghwa Marine Research Institute, Busan 47266, Korea
4Oceanic Climate and Ecology Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan 46083, Korea
*Corresponding author: Jin-Koo Kim, Division of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea, Tel: +82-51-629-5927, Fax: +82-51-629-5931, E-mail: taengko@hanmail.net

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 14, 2022; Revised: Mar 28, 2022; Accepted: Apr 13, 2022

Published Online: May 31, 2022

Abstract

Although giant and large fish species are highly important as a keystone species in the marine ecosystem, there have been no or few studies on their spatio-temporal variations around the Korean peninsula. For this, we analyzed daily reports made by observers at 57 fishery landing sites in Korea over 6 years, from 2011 to 2016. In total, 153 fish species were re-identified based on photos and descriptions recorded by Korean observers, of which five species were classified as a giant fish over 5 m in maximum total length (MTL) and 17 species as a large fish from 3 m to 5 m MTL according to the data presented by Froese & Pauly (2021). Among the giant and large fish species, Mola mola was the most abundant species, with 75 individuals landed as by-catch. The second most abundant species was Isurus oxyrinchus (31), followed by Mobula mobular (23), Lamna ditropis (17), Masturus lanceolatus (16), Sphyrna zygaena (14), and Prionace glauca (12). As a result of cluster analysis based on the number of individuals of giant and large fish species by year and sea, six years were separated into two clusters (2011–2013 vs. 2014–2016), with high contribution of M. mola, I. oxyrinchus, and M. lanceolatus; and three seas were separated into two clusters (eastern + southern seas vs. western sea), with high contribution of M. lanceolatus, L. ditropis, and I. oxyrinchus. The largest number of M. mola accounted for 64% of the total in 2014 and 2016, and 71% in summer (June–August). It is assumed to have a correlation between seawater temperature fluctuation and the occurrence of giant and large fish species. Our study highlights importance of longterm monitoring of giant and large fish species, and can help to understand the life cycle such as natal or nursery migration of giant and large fish species around the Korean peninsula.

Keywords: Giant fish; Large fish; Assemblage structure; Conservation; Korea

Introduction

A variety of ongoing studies are attempting to define the effects of climatic change and the subsequent responses of marine ecosystems. In recent years, these have included research into the effects of rising sea temperature on fish communities in the North Sea (Hofstede & Rijnsdorp, 2011), the effects of climatic change on the California Current ecosystem (King et al., 2011), the decline in walleye pollack recruitment in the east Bering Sea (Mueter et al., 2011), and sea level rises with global warming (Domingues et al., 2008; Oh et al., 2011). A study of the relationship between sea surface temperature (SST) and fish community structure in the North Sea in the past 140 years showed that SST had remained in the range of 6°C–6.5°C between 1870 and the late 1980s, when it increased rapidly, reaching a peak of about 8°C in 2000, causing changes in the fish community structure (Hofstede & Rijnsdorp, 2011). Together with climatic change, SST has increased rapidly around the Korean peninsula in the last four decades, with the SST of Jeju island increasing by about 0.8°C and that of the Korea Strait by about 1.0°C (Jung et al., 2013). Increasing SST causes fluctuations in the biomass at the lower trophic levels, including among diatoms (Tian et al., 2008), the fish species alternation phenomenon (Rebstock & Kang, 2003), and impacts on marine ecosystem and fisheries resources (Zhang et al., 2000). A regime shift occurred in the late 1980s or early 1990s, causing changes in diverse biota around the Korean peninsula (Rebstock & Kang, 2003). Despite many studies on the relationship between marine ecosystem change and climatic regime shift, there have been no reports examining the long-term occurrence of giant and large fish species associated with climatic-driven oceanic changes in Korea until now.

Occupying the position of top predators in the marine ecosystem, giant and large fish species (except plankton feeders such as whale shark) are of great importance as keystone species that regulate the marine ecosystem (Camhi et al., 1998; Compagno, 1990). Recently, increasing attention has also been paid to ecosystem-based fisheries management (Heath et al., 2003), which has intensified the interest in giant and large fish species as top predators in the marine ecosystem, but very little data are available on those species. This lack of data is due to the rarity of these species in catches and the extreme difficulty of transporting them to labs for analysis (Lee et al., 2013). Research carried out by Korean scientists on giant and large fish species is available as simple reports of the occurrences of Carcharodon carcharias (Choi, 2009; Choi & Nakaya, 2002), Mola mola (Lee et al., 2013), Regalecus russelii (Lee et al., 2013), Somniosus pacificus (Kang et al., 2015), and Lampris guttatus (Jeong et al., 2015), on the feeding of six shark species (Huh et al., 2010) and on the maturation and spawning of M. mola (Kang et al., 2015). Most giant and large fish species are susceptible to overexploitation due to their long life spans and late maturity. Once such species are overexploited, recovery of their stocks is difficult. Chondrichthyes species including sharks, skates, and rays are under high fishing pressure and have late maturity and low fecundity and are therefore under particular risk of stock depletion (Camhi et al., 1998; Compagno, 1984; Norman, 2005). According to the IUCN (2021), most of these species are listed as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), vulnerable (VU) or near threatened (NT), indicating how vulnerable these giant and large fish species are to fishing and overfishing. Therefore, even with small catch numbers, a different approach is needed to assess the stocks of these giant and large fish species from that used for small or medium fish to develop proper measures for their conservation. This study was carried out to provide an overview of the recent occurrences of giant and large fish species in Korean waters, and the results of this study are intended to contribute to the establishment of conservation measures.

Materials and Methods

A list of giant and large fish species occurring in Korean waters was compiled based on daily reports over 6 years from 2011 to 2016 collected by observers from the Korea Fisheries Resources Agency dispatched at 57 landing sites along the Korean coastline operated by Fisheries Cooperative (9 landing sites in Gangwon province, 7 in Gyeongbuk province, 4 in Ulleungdo island, 11 in Gyeongnam province, 3 in Busan city, 6 in Jeju island, 8 in Jeonnam province, 2 in Jeonbuk province, 4 in Chungnam province, and 3 in Incheon city). The daily reports included images and the morphological characteristics on which species identification was based. These data were carefully examined to confirm species identification with the aid of Nakaya (2011) and Nakabo (2013). Reports with low-resolution images and uncertain species identification were excluded from our study. Classification including scientific name follows the Kim et al. (2020) and Froese & Pauly (2021).

We artificially classified fish into small, medium, large, and giant categories, which were respectively defined as those with a maximum total length (MTL) of less than 1.0, 1.01–3.0, 3.01–5.0, and over 5.01 m. We applied this classification to create a list of giant and large fish species and also included fish species with MTLs of 3.01 m or larger described by Froese & Pauly (2021). We also reorganized and analyzed the size data for giant and large fish recorded by observers at the landing sites, which were included in the list.

In order to analyze the temporal and spatial distributions of SST in around the Korean peninsula, we utilized daily band images from NOAA satellite which were directly received by the National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS) of Korea. SST images were obtained from monthly means of daily Multi-Channel Sea Surface Temperature (MCSST) based on NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) band and which were determined average variations of the oceanic conditions in areas bounded between 25–45°N in latitude and 118–142°E in longitude during 2011–2016 (NIFS, 2015).

Cluster analysis was performed based on the number of individuals per species after square root transformation during the study period by year and sea (eastern sea, southern sea, and western sea) and analysis of similarities was carried out to determine the statistical significance of the cluster. A analysis of similarity percentages was performed to determine the species contributing to the division. All of these analyses were performed using Primer version 6.0.

Results and Discussion

Among the fish recorded by observers in the Korea Fisheries Resources Agency from 2011 to 2016 at 57 landing sites around the Korean waters, the fish species with a MTL of 3.01 m or more are listed in Table 1. Regardless of the actual size of all fish individuals at landing sites, all fish were included in the category of giant or large fish according to the MTL of each fish species described by Froese & Pauly (2021). As a result, a total of five species of giant fish and 17 species of large fish were confirmed to occur in Korean waters during the survey period.

Table 1. Yearly variations in the number of individuals of giant (No. 1–5) and large (No. 6–22) fish species caught in Korean waters between 2011 and 2016
No. Scientific name (Korean name) Max size (cm)1) Unit 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sum
1 Rhincodon typus (고래상어) 1,700 TL 2 2 3 1 8
2 Regalecus russellii (산갈치) 800 TL 1 1 2
3 Galeocerdo cuvier (뱀상어) 750 TL 1 1
4 Alopias vulpinus (흰배환도상어) 573 TL 1 2 3 1 4 2 13
5 Carcharodon carcharias (백상아리) 541 TL 2 3 3 1 9
6 Sphyrna zygaena (귀상어) 500 TL 1 1 1 4 7 14
7 Makaira mazara (녹새치) 500 TL 2 3 1 1 7
8 Istiompax indica (백새치) 465 FL 1 3 1 5
9 Xiphias gladius (황새치) 455 FL 4 2 6
10 Isurus oxyrinchus (청상아리) 445 TL 4 1 5 8 13 31
11 Bathytoshia brevicaudata (흑가오리) 430 TL 1 1 1 1 2 3 9
12 Sphyrna lewini (홍살귀상어) 430 TL 4 4
13 Alopias pelagicus (환도상어) 428 TL 2 2
14 Kajikia audax (청새치) 420 TL 1 2 2 1 6
15 Prionace glauca (청새리상어) 400 TL 4 8 12
16 Hemitrygon sinensis (갈색가오리) 380 TL 7 1 8
17 Istiophorus platypterus (돛새치) 348 FL 1 2 1 1 1 6
18 Masturus lanceolatus (물개복치) 337 TL 1 7 8 16
19 Mola mola (개복치) 333 TL 1 5 9 23 12 25 75
20 Carcharhinus brachyurus (무태상어) 325 TL 1 1 2
21 Mobula mobular (쥐가오리) 310 DW 1 1 1 4 1 15 23
22 Lamna ditropis (악상어) 305 TL 1 1 8 3 4 17
Sum 11 25 22 71 49 97 276

1) Data from Froese & Pauly (2021).

TL, total length; FL, fork length; DW, disc width.

Download Excel Table
Giant fish species

Although actual recorded size of five species is less than 5 m, they belong to the giant fish category according to Froese & Pauly (2021). The five giant fish species and actual recorded size are as follows: Rhincodon typus (3.9–5.3 m TL), R. russelii (1.8–3.3 m TL), Galeocerdo cuvier (1.2 m TL), Alopias vulpinus (1.1–5.0 m TL), and C. carcharias (1.5–4.5 m TL) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Aside from R. russelii, the other four species belong to Chondrichthyes. During the survey period, A. vulpinus showed the highest frequency of occurrence with 13 accidentally caught individuals, followed by C. carcharias with 9 individuals, R. typus with 8 individuals, R. russelii with 2 individuals and G. cuvier with 1 individual.

fas-25-5-298-g1
Fig. 1. Representative photos of five giant fish occurred around the Korean peninsula from 2011 to 2016.
Download Original Figure

The whale shark (R. typus), the only species in the family Rhincodontidae, is the largest fish species on earth, growing as long as 17 m. It has a world-wide distribution (GBIF, 2021), and is a docile shark that filter feeds on small fish, crustaceans and squid (Compagno, 1984; Nakabo et al., 2001; Norman, 2005; Taylor, 2007). In Korea, records of this species can only be found in fish picture books or media reports (Chyung, 1977; Kim et al., 2005), but there is no specimen-based record on occurrences. Our survey found a total of eight whale shark individuals over a period of 6 years, particularly during the summer season (July–September) (Table 2). Their total lengths ranged from 3.9 to 5.3 m (average 4.61 m), and all were below 8 m, the length at which 50% of male individuals are mature (30 years old) (Norman & Stevens, 2007). Accidental catches of three individuals each occurred in Gangwon and Gyeongbuk provinces by set net, indicating that the whale shark occurs mainly in the eastern sea of Korea (Table 3). The whale shark is ovoviviparous, with over 300 embryos in various developmental phases found in the uterus of a fish that was 10.6 m in total length (Joung et al., 1996). R. typus is listed as VU on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2021), and international trade of this species is restricted under CITES (CITES, 2021). Even though the number of by-catch was low in Korea, it is essential to design the avoidance protocols in the set net fishermen in the eastern sea of Korea.

Table 2. Monthly variations in the number of individuals of giant (No. 1–5) and large (No. 6–22) fish species caught in Korean waters between 2011 and 2016
No. Scientific name Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Sum
1 Rhincodon typus 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 8
2 Regalecus russellii 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
3 Galeocerdo cuvier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
4 Alopias vulpinus 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 0 1 3 0 0 13
5 Carcharodon carcharias 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 9
6 Sphyrna zygaena 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 2 1 2 0 14
7 Makaira mazara 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 7
8 Istiompax indica 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 5
9 Xiphias gladius 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 6
10 Isurus oxyrinchus 2 1 3 1 2 3 10 1 5 2 1 0 31
11 Bathytoshia brevicaudata 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 0 9
12 Sphyrna lewini 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 4
13 Alopias pelagicus 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
14 Kajikia audax 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 6
15 Prionace glauca 3 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 12
16 Hemitrygon sinensis 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 8
17 Istiophorus platypterus 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 6
18 Masturus lanceolatus 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 6 2 0 16
19 Mola mola 2 0 6 0 0 19 16 18 1 7 6 0 75
20 Carcharhinus brachyurus 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
21 Mobula mobular 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 5 2 1 0 0 23
22 Lamna ditropis 1 3 1 2 0 0 6 1 1 0 1 1 17
Sum 9 9 12 5 7 37 72 49 34 21 19 2 276
Download Excel Table
Table 3. Spatial variations in the number of individuals of giant (No. 1–5) and large (No. 6–22) fish species caught in Korean waters between 2011 and 2016
No. Scientific name Eastern sea Southern sea Western sea Sum
1 Rhincodon typus 6 2 0 8
2 Regalecus russelii 1 1 0 2
3 Galeocerdo cuvier 0 1 0 1
4 Alopias vulpinus 5 3 5 13
5 Carcharodon carcharias 5 1 3 9
6 Sphyrna zygaena 4 4 6 14
7 Makaira mazara 6 1 0 7
8 Istiompax indica 3 2 0 5
9 Xiphias gladius 2 4 0 6
10 Isurus oxyrhinchus 17 11 3 31
11 Bathytoshia brevicaudata 4 2 3 9
12 Sphyrna lewini 0 4 0 4
13 Alopias pelagicus 1 1 0 2
14 Kajikia audax 5 1 0 6
15 Prionace glauca 10 1 1 12
16 Hemitrygon sinensis 8 0 0 8
17 Istiophorus platypterus 4 2 0 6
18 Masturus lanceolatus 12 4 0 16
19 Mola mola 52 12 11 75
20 Carcharhinus brachyurus 0 1 1 2
21 Mobula mobular 20 1 2 23
22 Lamna ditropis 14 3 0 17
Sum 179 62 35 276
Download Excel Table

The largest species among Osteichthyes, the oarfish (R. russelii) is distributed in the Pacific Ocean, and grows as long as 8 m and can self-amputate the posterior part of its body (Froese & Pauly, 2021; Nelson & Grande, 2016). A total of two R. russellii individuals were accidentally caught during the survey period: one in Jumunjin (eastern sea of Korea) in November and one in Geoje (southern sea of Korea) in February (Tables 2 and 3). Lee et al. (2013) reported that the stomachs of two oarfish collected from the eastern sea of Korea were full of euphausiids, which is consistent with the results of previous research on its prey (euphausiids, small fish, and cephalopods; Palmer et al., 1986; Roberts, 2012). Their occurrence may be associated with prey. These accidentally caught individuals had total lengths of 1.8–3.3 m (average 2.55 m), all below the species’ known MTL of 8.0 m (Compagno, 1984). R. russellii is listed as least concern (LC) on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2021).

The tiger shark (G. cuvier), in the family Carcharhinidae grows as long as 7.5 m (Vidthayanon, 2005) and is the third largest species among those surveyed in our study, following R. typus and R. russelii. With no voucher specimens in Korea (Choi, 2009), and only one accidentally caught individual found in this survey, the tiger shark is considered a very rare species in Korean waters. According to Myers (1991), a female tiger shark can give birth to as many as 80 pups with total lengths ranging from 0.51 to 1.04 m, and thus the 1.2 m long tiger shark reported in this survey may be considered a newborn pup. We identified the tiger shark based on its dark dorsolateral stripes, which distinguish this species from other shark species (Choi, 2016; Nakabo, 2013). The tiger shark is distributed around the world (GBIF, 2021), found at the surface or at shallow depths of less than 140 m (Smith, 1997), and occasionally swims into river estuaries (Compagno, 1984). G. cuvier is listed as NT on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2021).

The common thresher (A. vulpinus) accounted for a total of 13 accidental catches during the survey period, most of which occurred from May to July over a wide area (Table 2); five individuals each were caught in Gyeongbuk (eastern sea of Korea) and Jeonnam (western sea of Korea) (Table 3). The surveyed common threshers had total lengths of 1.1–5.0 m (average 2.65 m), thus approximately half of the species’ MTL of 5.7 m (Compagno, 1984). The common thresher belongs to the family Alopiidae and feeds on fish, squid and crustaceans by stunning them with powerful swipes of its caudal fin, which is as long as the rest of its body (Compagno, 1984). Being ovoviviparous, the developing embryos feed on other eggs ovulated by the mother (Compagno, 2001). The common thresher resembles the congeneric species A. pelagicus but can be distinguished from the latter by the white of its belly extending in a band over the bases of its pectoral fins (Nakabo, 2013). The common thresher has a world-wide distribution (GBIF, 2021), and occurs in all seas of Korean waters (Choi, 2016), which is consistent with the results of our survey (Table 3). The species is currently listed as VU on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2021).

During the survey period, there were nine accidental catches of the great white shark (C. carcharias), which occurred mostly in June–September and November–January (Table 2). Based on this result, the great white shark seems to migrate to Korean waters after June. Landing areas include Gyeongbuk (eastern sea of Korea) and Chungnam provinces (western sea of Korea) (Table 3). The accidentally caught great white sharks had total lengths ranging from 1.5 to 4.5 m (average 2.28 m). Most were less than half of the species’ MTL of 7.0 m (Nakaya, 2011). There are a total of six reported fatal human attacks by the species in Korean waters, all occurring during the month of May in Jeonbuk and Chungnam provinces (western sea of Korea; Choi & Nakaya, 2002). These changes are assumed to have contributed to the recent shift in the migratory route of the great white shark from the western sea of Korea (11 individuals in the west and 6 in the east; Choi, 2016) to the eastern sea of Korea (3 individuals in the west and 5 in the east; the present study). Great white shark attacks on divers collecting shellfish have been reported in the western sea of Korea; the divers were likely recognized as prey or food competitors by the species (Choi, 2016). According to the size data of great white sharks observed in Korean waters, no individuals were 1 m or less, 7 individuals were 1.01–3.0 m, 11 individuals were 3.01–5.0 m, and 1 individual was 5.01 m or longer (Choi, 2009; Choi & Nakaya, 2002). Thus, this species can be categorized as giant fish with a high risk of human attack. C. carcharias has a world-wide distribution (GBIF, 2021), is listed as VU and moderately depleted (MD) on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2021), and international trade of this species is restricted under CITES (CITES, 2021).

Large fish species

Our survey found 17 fish species were classified as large fish category with a MTL of 3.01–5.0 m according to Froese & Pauly (2021) (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Taxonomically, 10 and 7 of these species belong to Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes, respectively. Among the cartilaginous fish species, 7 were sharks and the other 3 rays. Among the seven bony fish species, five and two are billfish and ocean sunfish, respectively. During the survey period, M. mola was the dominant species, followed by I. oxyrinchus, M. mobular, L. ditropis, S. zygaena, and P. glauca comprising 75, 31, 23, 17, 14, and 12 individuals, respectively (Table 1).

fas-25-5-298-g2
Fig. 2. Representative photos of 17 large fish occurred around the Korean peninsula from 2011 to 2016. DW, disc width.
Download Original Figure

Sharks have been seriously overexploited due to increasing demand for shark fin (Choi, 2016). Most shark species tended to occur all around the year in the eastern sea of Korea (Tables 2 and 3). Among large sharks reported by the observers, S. lewini was classified as EN, I. oxyrinchus, Alopias pelagicus, and S. zygaena as VU, P. glauca and Carcharhinus brachyurus as NT and L. ditropis as LC (IUCN, 2021). In particular, international trade of S. zygaena is prohibited under CITES (CITES, 2021). Sound studies on various conservation measures for shark species under increasing demand are necessary for their conservation and management by IUCN and CITES. The survey showed that sharks were caught most frequently using a set net (40.5%), followed by gill net (24.3%), stow net (10.8%), coastal complex fishery (8.1%), bottom trawl (8.1%), angling (5.4%), and purse seine (2.7%). Considering the high accidental catch rate using set nets, application of shark-deterrent devices or escape devices to set nets is essential.

During the survey, a total of five billfish species (Istiophorus platypterus, Istiompax indica, Makaira mazara, Kajikia audax, and Xiphias gladius) were identified, representing the second greatest variety of large fish species. Among the five species, four belong to the family Istiophoridae and one to the Xiphiidae. A total of 30 billfish individuals were accidentally caught during the survey period. Their measured total lengths ranged from 1.0 to 3.3 m, with most individuals longer than 2.0 m. Excluding X. gladius (which occurred during February, July, August, and November), most billfish species occurred during summer (July–September) (Table 2) in the eastern sea of Korea (Table 3). IUCN classifies K. audax as NT, I. platypterus and X. gladius as LC (IUCN, 2021).

The survey revealed that the ocean sunfish (M. mola) and sharptail mola (Masturus lanceolatus) were caught primarily in the eastern sea of Korea, while the ocean sunfish was occasionally caught around Jeju island and in the western sea of Korea (Table 3). During the 6-year survey period, a total of 75 occurrences of M. mola and 16 occurrences of M. lanceolatus were observed. The ocean sunfish was caught year-round, with most occurrences concentrated in June–August (71% of the total) (Table 2). The sharptail mola was found in July and August–November, which is shorter than the catch period of the ocean sunfish (Table 2). According to Lee et al. (2013), a total of 496 ocean sunfish (M. mola) were caught in the waters of Jeju island over 3 years from 2010 to 2012, which indicates a significant difference from our results. Such a difference in the main fishing ground of ocean sunfish (Gyeongbuk in the present study vs. Jeju island in Lee et al., 2013) should be closely reexamined in a future study. Furthermore, Lee et al. (2013) assumed that M. mola is mainly distributed around Jeju island and in the eastern sea of Korea and suggested that further detailed studies are needed to understand the extent of habitat, distribution, and ecological migratory route of the species. Later, Kang et al. (2015) carried out microscopic examination of the gonad of the ocean sunfish and suggested a potential spawning near Jeju island between July and October. IUCN categorizes M. mola as VU and M. lanceolatus as LC (IUCN, 2021).

There are 633 ray species in 26 families distributed across the world, among which 10 species are listed as CR, 30 as EN, 72 as VU, 58 as NT, 144 as LC, and 243 as data deficient (DD) on the IUCN red list (Last et al., 2016). Among the ray species surveyed, the three species Bathytoshia brevicaudata, Hemitrygon sinensis, and M. mobular were classified as large fish species. M. mobular was the most dominant species, comprising 23 individuals, followed by B. brevicaudata (9 individuals) and H. sinensis (8 individuals). In terms of season, M. mobular mostly occurred during June–August and H. sinensis during September, whereas B. brevicaudata occurred almost year-round (Table 2). In terms of occurrence area, B. brevicaudata occurred widely including three seas, but H. sinensis and M. mobular occurred mainly at the eastern sea of Korea (Table 3). IUCN categorizes M. mobular as NT (IUCN, 2021), and CITES also limitedly prohibited international trade of the species (CITES, 2021).

Assemblage structure of giant and large fish species

Cluster analysis produced of giant and large fish species by year resulted in two clusters divided at the Bray-Curtis similarity of 50. One cluster includes years after 2014 and the other includes years before 2013, with 2011 being the most distinct, and 2014 and 2016 the most similar years. The species that drove the differentiation between periods were M. mola (contribution = 10.51%), I. oxyrinchus (8.38%), M. lanceolatus (7.34%), L. ditropis (6.97%), and P. glauca (6.75%) (Fig. 3). M. mola accounted for the largest number of individuals, 64% of the total in 2014 and 2016, and 71% in summer (June–August). In addition, as a result of cluster analysis based on species composition of giant and large fish species by sea, the eastern sea of Korea was closely clustered with the southern sea of Korea, and the western sea of Korea was more distant. The most important differentiating species were M. lanceolatus (contribution = 9.21%), L. ditropis (9.08%), I. oxyrinchus (6.77%), R. typus (6.51%), and X. gladius (6.18%).

fas-25-5-298-g3
Fig. 3. Assemblage structure based on yearly variations in species composition of giant and large fish from 2011 to 2016 using multi-dimensional scaling and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) methods.
Download Original Figure

We analyzed the SST of summer (June–September) when frequency of occurrence of M. mola and I. oxyrinchus was the highest. M. mola were most frequently caught in August 2014 and July 2016, when the SST anomaly was particularly negative (–). I. oxyrinchus also showed the highest frequency of occurrence in July 2014, July 2015, and September 2016, and even at this time, the SST anomaly was negative (Fig. 4). This indicates that the SST of when a large number of M. mola and I. oxyrinchus occurred is lower than the average SST for the past 30 years. Therefore, it is not necessarily considered that giant and large fish species increase only by rising SST, suggesting that there may exist a species-specific suitable seawater temperature range or any other reason such as prey abundance.

fas-25-5-298-g4
Fig. 4. Sea surface temperature anomaly around the Korean peninsula during June–September between 2011 (above), 2014 (middle) and 2016 (lower). Among them, 2011 showed cold regime but 2014 (except August) and 2016 showed warm regime.
Download Original Figure

Notwithstanding, increases in seawater temperature have recently been associated increased frequency of occurrence of many subtropical species in Jeju island and the eastern sea of Korea (Kim, 2009; Kim et al., 1999; Lee & Kim, 2021; Lee et al., 2021) and change in fish community structure (Jung et al., 2013; Ryu & Kim, 2020). Rebstock & Kang (2003) provided evidence for variations in regime shifts in the three seas around the Korean peninsula, for example, the abundance of amphipods, chaetognaths, and euphausiids increased in the eastern and southern seas of Korea, but not the western sea of Korea. Indeed, the ecosystem of the western sea of Korea differs from that of the eastern and southern seas of Korea, which was supported by physical (Kim, 2009; Lie, 1989; Seung, 1992) and biogeographic data (Bae et al., 2020; Gwak & Nakayama, 2011; Kim et al., 2017; Myoung & Kim, 2014). Most recently, Ryu & Kim (2020) carefully suggested that the thermal front of the middle East Sea moved north from Jukbyun to Jumunjin by comparing the past and present fish fauna. In order to better understand the yearly fluctuations of giant and large fish species in Korean waters, it requires further study linking marine environmental variables (e.g., temperature or salinity), with biological characteristics (e.g., prey or habitat preference).

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

This work was supported by National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (2022M01100) and National Institute of Fisheries Science (R2022036), Korea.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Kim Hae-Sol, Hwang Seon-Jae and all Korean observers (Korea Fisheries Resources Agency) for providing long term data on giant and large fish species occurrence, and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Bae SE, Kim EM, Park JY, Kim JK. Population genetic structure of the grass puffer (Tetraodontiformes: Tetraodontidae) in the northwestern Pacific revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequences and microsatellite loci. Mar Biodivers. 2020; 50:19

2.

Camhi M, Fowler S, Musick J, Bräutigam A, Fordham S. Sharks and their relatives: ecology and conservation. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature. 1998; p p. 1-39.

3.

Choi Y. Distribution of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias and other sharks around the Korean waters. Korean J Ichthyol. 2009; 21:44-51.

4.

Choi Y. Sharks of Korea. Seocheon: National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea. 2016.

5.

Choi Y, Nakaya K. First report on the fatal shark attacks along the western coast, Korea, with records of white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, in Korean waters. Korean J Ichthyol. 2002; 14:599-601.

6.

Chyung MK. The fishes of Korea. Seoul: Iljisa. 1977; p p. 727.

7.

CITES. Appendices I, II and III: valid from 22 June 2021 [Internet]. CITES. 2021[cited 2021 Jun 30]https://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php/

8.

Compagno LJV. FAO species catalogue. Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of sharks species known to date. FAO Fish Synop. 1984; 4:1-249.

9.

Compagno LJV. Alternative life-history styles of cartilaginous fishes in time and space. Environ Biol Fishes. 1990; 28:33-75

10.

Compagno LJV. Sharks of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. FAO Species Cat Fish Purp. 2001; 1:269.

11.

Domingues CM, Church JA, White NJ, Gleckler PJ, Wijffels SE, Barker PM, et al. Improved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea-level rise. Nature. 2008; 453:1090-3

12.

Froese R, Pauly D. FishBase [Internet]. 2021[cited 2021 May 1]http://www.fishbase.org

13.

Global Biodiversity Information Facility [GBIF]. Free and open access to biodiversity data [Internet]. 2021[cited 2021 Dec 31]http://www.gbif.org/

14.

Gwak WS, Nakayama K. Genetic variation and population structure of the Pacific cod Gadus macrocephalus in Korean waters revealed by mtDNA and msDNA markers. Fish Sci. 2011; 77:945-52

15.

Heath RT, Hwang SJ, Munawar M. A hypothesis for the assessment of the importance of microbial food web linkages in nearshore and offshore habitats of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag. 2003; 6:231-9

16.

Hofstede R, Rijnsdorp AD. Comparing demersal fish assemblages between periods of contrasting climate and fishing pressure. ICES J Mar Sci. 2011; 68:1189-98

17.

Huh SH, Park JM, Park SC, Kim JH, Baeck GW. Feeding habits of 6 shark species in the southern sea of Korea. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2010; 43:254-61

18.

International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN]. The IUCN red list of threatened species [Internet]. 2021[cited 2022 Jan 17]https://www.iucnredlist.org

19.

Jeong MK, Shin D, Kim MJ, Jo HS, Hwang K. New record of the Opah, Lampris guttatus (Lampriformes: Lampridae) from East Sea, Korea. Korean J Ichthyol. 2015; 27:55-9.

20.

Joung SJ, Chen CT, Clark E, Uchida S, Huang WYP. The whale shark, Rhincodon typus, is a livebearer: 300 embryos found in one ‘megamamma’ supreme. Environ Biol Fishes. 1996; 46:219-23

21.

Jung S, Ha S, Na H. Multi-decadal changes in fish communities Jeju island in relation to climate change. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013; 46:186-94

22.

Kang MJ, Baek HJ, Lee DW, Choi JH. Sexual maturity and spawning of ocean sunfish Mola mola in Korean waters. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2015; 48:739-44

23.

Kim IS, Choi Y, Lee CL, Lee YJ, Kim BJ, Kim JH. Illustrated book of Korean fishes. Seoul: Kyohak. 2005; p p. 615.

24.

Kim JK. Diversity and conservation of Korean marine fishes. Korean J Ichthyol. 2009; 21:52-62.

25.

Kim JK, Bae SE, Lee SJ, Yoon MG. New insight into hybridization and unidirectional introgression between Ammodytes japonicus and Ammodytes heian (Trachiniformes, Ammodytidae). PLOS ONE. 2017; 12e0178001

26.

Kim JK, Kwun HJ, Ji HS, Park JH, Myoung SH, Song YS, et al. A guide book to marine fishes in Korea. Sejong: Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. 2020; p p. 222.

27.

Kim JT, Jeong DG, Rho HK. Environmental character and catch fluctuation of set net ground in the coastal water of Hanlim in Cheju island. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 1999; 32:105-11.

28.

King JR, Agostini VN, Harvey CJ, McFarlane GA, Foreman MGG, Overland JE, et al. Climate forcing and the California current ecosystem. ICES J Mar Sci. 2011; 68:1199-216

29.

Last PR, White W, Carvalho MR, Séret B, Stehmann M, Naylor GJP. Rays of the World. Clayton North: CSIRO. 2016; p p. 790

30.

Lee HW, Yang JH, Sohn MH, Lee JB, Chun YY, Hwang KS, et al. Occurrence of Architeuthis sp. and Regalecus russellii in the East Sea, Korea1. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013; 46:856-61

31.

Lee YJ, Kim JK. New record of the schooling bannerfish Heniochus diphreutes (Perciformes: Chaetodontidae) from Pohang, Korea. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2021; 54:1017-22.

32.

Lee YJ, Song YS, Kim JK. First record of juvenile of the mirror butterflyfish, Chaetodon speculum Cuvier, 1831 (Perciformes: Chaetodontidae) collected from Pohang, Korea. J Korean Soc Fish Ocean Technol. 2021; 57:374-81

33.

Lie HJ. Tidal fronts in the southeastern Hwanghae (Yellow Sea). Cont Shelf Res. 1989; 9:527-46

34.

Mueter FJ, Bond NA, Ianelli JN, Hollowed AB. Expected declines in recruitment of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) in the eastern Bering Sea under future climate change. ICES J Mar Sci. 2011; 68:1284-96

35.

Myers RF. Micronesian reef fishes. 2nded Guam: Coral Graphics. 1991; p p. 298.

36.

Myoung SH, Kim JK. Genetic diversity and population structure of the gizzard shad, Konosirus punctatus (Clupeidae, Pisces), in Korean waters based on mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Genes Genomics. 2014; 36:591-8

37.

Nakabo T. Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species. 3rded Tokyo: Tokai University Press. 2013; p p. 2428.

38.

Nakabo T, Machida Y, Yamaoka K, Nishida K. Fishes of the Kuroshio current, Japan. Osaka: Osaka Aquarium Kaiyukan. 2001; p p. 300.

39.

Nakaya K. Sharks: king of the ocean. Tokyo: Bookmansha. 2011; p p. 240.

40.

National Institute of Fisheries Science [NIFS]. The temperature of Korea seas from NOAA satellite (1990–2014). Busan: NIFS. 2015; p p. 399.

41.

Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH. Fishes of the world. 5thed Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2016; p p. 707

42.

Norman B. The whale shark [Internet]. Marine Education Society of Australasia. 2005[cited 2021 Jun 30]http://www.mesa.edu.au/seaweek2005/pdf_senior/is05.pdf.

43.

Norman BM, Stevens JD. Size and maturity status of the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) at Ningaloo Reef in western Australia. Fish Res. 2007; 84:81-6

44.

Oh SM, Kwon SJ, Moon IJ, Lee EI. Sea level rise due to global warming in the Northwestern Pacific and seas around the Korean peninsula. J Korean Soc Coast Ocean Eng. 2011; 23:236-47

45.

Palmer G. Regalecidae.In In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E, editors.editors Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO. 1986; 2 p. 727-8

46.

Rebstock GA, Kang YS. A comparison of three marine ecosystems surrounding the Korean peninsula: responses to climate change. Prog Oceanogr. 2003; 59:357-79

47.

Roberts TR. Systematics, biology, and distribution of the species of the oceanic oarfish genus Regalecus (Teleostei, Lampridiformes, Regalecidae). Paris: Publications Scientifiques du Muséum. 2012; p p. 268.

48.

Ryu JH, Kim JK. Diversity and assemblage structure of marine fish species collected by set net in Korean peninsula during 2009-2013. Ocean Sci J. 2020; 55:581-91

49.

Seung YH. Water masses and circulations around Korean peninsula. J Oceanol Soc Korea. 1992; 27:324-31.

50.

Smith CL. National Audubon Society field guide to tropical marine fishes of the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, the Bahamas, and Bermuda. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. 1997; p p. 720.

51.

Taylor JG. Ram filter-feeding and nocturnal feeding of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) at Ningaloo Reef, western Australia. Fish Res. 2007; 84:65-70

52.

Tian Y, Kidokoro H, Watanabe T, Iguchi N. The late 1980s regime shift in the ecosystem of Tsushima warm current in the Japan/East Sea: evidence from historical data and possible mechanisms. Prog Oceanogr. 2008; 77:127-45

53.

Vidthayanon C. Thailand red data: fishes. Bangkok: Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. 2005; p p. 108.

54.

Zhang CI, Lee JB, Kim S, Oh JH. Climatic regime shifts and their impacts on marine ecosystem and fisheries resources in Korean waters. Prog Oceanogr. 2000; 47:171-90