SHORT COMMUNICATION

Estimation of first maturity size of dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus in the Molucca Sea, North Sulawesi, Indonesia

Silvester Benny Pratasik1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-509X, Ferdinand Frans Tilaar1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-2513, Meiske Sofie Salaki1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-8856
Author Information & Copyright
1Department of Fisheries Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Jl. Kampus Bahu, Manado 95115, Indonesia
*Corresponding author: Silvester Benny Pratasik, Department of Fisheries Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Jl. Kampus Bahu, Manado 95115, Indonesia. Tel: +62-081356221375, E-mail: spjong07@yahoo.com

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Nov 17, 2021Feb 26, 2022; Accepted: May 05, 2022

Published Online: Jun 30, 2022

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the smallest size of mature individuals that can be exploited. Fish samples of Coryphaena hippurus were collected from Kalinaun fishermen’s catches in the Molucca Sea. They were sexed, then the fork length (FL) and maturity stage were recorded. Results showed that C. hippurus in the Molucca Sea had a sex ratio of 1:1.94 (p < 0.05). Males had a length range of 499–831 mm FL and females were in the length range of 481–813 mm FL. Size at first maturity was estimated as 529 mm FL for males with a range of 475–588 mm FL and 405 mm FL for females. This study provided basic information for future management needs of the dolphinfish, especially in the Molucca Sea.

Keywords: Sex; Fork length (FL); Maturity stage; Kalinaun; Fishermen

Introduction

Fisheries management must be directed to maintain the fish populations remain sufficiently abundant to minimize extinction risk and sustain intact ecosystems (Freshwater et al., 2020). Fish reproduction is an important aspect in maintaining the equilibrium of the fish stock population in the water since stock recovery is highly dependent upon reproductive success that is closely related to environmental changes particularly temperature, photoperiod, and food supply (Jonsson & Jonsson, 2014). Thus, fecundity, sexual maturity, and spawning habits must be understood to explain the variation of the population level to increase the amount of fish harvest and maintain the recovery rate (Brown et al., 2003; Das et al., 1989).

Dolphinfish, Coryphaena hippurus(Linnaeus, 1758) (Coryphaenidae), known as mahi-mahi, is a commercially important species in tropical and temperate waters worldwide (Benjamin & Kurup, 2012) in line with the tuna catch decline in the Indian Ocean (IOTC, 2012). This species has a sufficiently large size, the young one is about 30 cm long and the adults can reach 200 cm long with bodyweight up to 50 kg. The individual weight of fish caught ranges from 7 to 13 kg and rarely reaches 15 kg. The species is caught as bycatch in several types of fishing gears, such as purse seine, longline, and trolling (Chodrijah & Nugroho, 2016).

C. hippurus is a long-range and fast swimming fish that displace with time and is an opportunistic epipelagic predator and preys on biota associated with a fish aggregating device (FAD) and floating debris, such as fish, squids, and shrimps (Malone et al., 2011; Whitney et al., 2016). C. hippurus can stay several days in association with a raft (Taquet et al., 2007). Dolphinfish spend > 80% of daytime activity and 40% of nighttime activity near the surface (Lin et al., 2020) and inhabit warmer seawater temperatures of 24°C–30°C (Palko et al., 1982; Schlenker et al., 2021). When surface sea temperature rises, dolphinfish use behavioral thermoregulation by moving deeper up to 250 m, and the nighttime activity increased with increasing lunar illumination (Schlenker et al., 2021). The IUCN status of dolphinfish is the least concerned (Carlson et al., 2020).

This study is aimed at estimating the size at first maturity of dolphinfish C. hippurus caught in the Molucca Sea, North Sulawesi. Size at first maturity is the smallest size of mature legally taken, the size at which 50% of the individuals are sexually mature (Farley et al., 2013). Knowledge of length at maturity and spawning season is important for the proper management and conservation of fish stocks (Nandikeswari, 2016). Size at first maturity is commonly evaluated for wild populations as a point of biological reference to ensure that a sufficient number of juveniles reaches maturity (Roa et al., 1999) because only fishing the individuals which have reached maturity is one of the basic rules that should be followed to ensure sustainability (Ilkyaz et al., 2018). It has been utilized in various exploited animals, such as crustaceans (Peixoto et al., 2018), fish populations (Tesfahun, 2018), and mollusks (Galimany et al., 2015), to protect juveniles, let them grow into adults, and spawn at least once before being caught. Proper estimation of size at first maturity is very useful for fish stock management (Karna & Panda, 2011). These data provide basic information on fish biology that is crucial for dolphinfish fisheries management in Indonesian waters and other neighboring countries.

Materials and Methods

Dolphinfish C. hippurus samples were mainly collected from fishermen in the Kalinaun coast, East Likupang district, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi. The fish samples were obtained from May to July 2021, because there was no catch after this period. Fishing activity was conducted near a man-made FAD in the Molucca Sea located in the northeastern part of the village between 125°11’24’’ E and 125°13’48’’ E and 1°35’24’’ and 1°35’24’’ N. Local fishermen usually used live bait-handline. Live baits were obtained in the multi-hooks handline fishing before daybreak. Trolling was also carried out around the FAD to obtain more samples. The fish were sexed on the beach. The fork length (FL) and weight were also recorded, then the gonads were removed and brought to the Laboratory of the Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, for further observation. The estimation of sex ratio used a non-parametric comparative test Chi-square (x2, α = 0.05). Gonadal maturation was observed under a dissecting microscope. The fish maturity stage was identified following Effendie (2002) (Table 1).

Table 1. Gonad maturity characteristics
Maturity stage Note Female Male
I Immature Small ovary up to 1/2 the length of the body cavity. It is translucent. Oocyte does not appear. The testis is small up to 1/2 the length of the body cavity. It is whitish.
II Maturing The ovary is about half the length of the body cavity. It is orange and translucent, and the oocyte cannot be seen by the naked eye. The testis is about 1/2 the length of the body cavity. It is white and about symmetrical.
III Ripening The ovary is about 2/3 the length of the body cavity. Ovary yellow-orange, oocyte appears. Ovary with blood vessels on the surface. No transparent eggs or translucent, eggs are still dark. The testis is about 2/3 the length of the body cavity.
IV Ripe The ovary is about 2/3 up to full of the body cavity. The ovary is orange-pink with blood vessels on the surface, and eggs are apparent. The testis is about 2/3 up to fulfilling the body cavity. It is white-soft cream.
V Spent Ovary shrinks down to 1/2 the body cavity. Wall is thick. There may be dark and mature eggs in the ovary that disintegrate from absorption, dark or translucent. Testis shrinks down to 1/2 the body cavity. Wall is thick. The testis is soft.
Download Excel Table

The first gonad maturity was estimated by setting the size class intervals, from the smallest to the largest one. Length distribution analysis followed Sturges (1926) as follows:

k = 1 + 3.3 log n

where k is number of classes and n is number of data. The class interval was estimated as

C = X n X 1 k

where C is class interval, Xn is the largest data value, X1 is the smallest data value, and k is number of classes.

Spearman-Karber equation was applied to estimate the size at first maturity of the fish (Udupe, 1986) as follows:

m= x k + x 2 ( × p1 )

where xk = log last size in which 100% fish are fully mature

x = log size increment = xl+1 – xl, l = 1, 2, …, k–1

and xo = log last size in which no fish are fully mature

rl = number of fully mature fish in size group i

pi = proportion of fully mature fish in size group i

pl = rl/nl, if nl ≠ nl+1 for i = 1, 2, …, k–i

and pl = rl/n, if n = nl = nl+1 for i = 1, 2, …, k–i.

Size at first maturity was obtained with antilog (m) = M.

a n t i l o g [ m ± 1 .96 x 2 i { ( p i q i ) n i 1 } ]

Results

During the study 50 fish individuals were collected from local fishermen in Kalinaun coast, East Likupang district, North Minahasa, North Sulawesi. Males had a size range of 405–674 mm FL with a weight range of 670–1,640 g, and females were at a length range of 431–687 mm FL with a weight range of 725–2,650 g. Based on Sturges (1926), the length distribution was divided into 6 size classes (Fig. 1).

fas-25-6-350-g1
Fig. 1. Size frequency distribution of Coryphaena hippurus.
Download Original Figure
Sex ratio, maturity stage, and size at first maturity

Sex ratio information is useful to maximize reproduction. The present study found a sex ratio of 1:1.94 (p < 0.05) represented by 17 males and 33 females. Gonad maturity of this species shows that more females mature at a smaller size than males (Table 2).

Table 2. Gonad maturity stage of Coryphaena hippurus
Size class (mm) Gonad maturity stage (n = 50)
I II III IV
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
400–449 0 0 4 0 3 3 0 0
450–499 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 3
500–549 1 0 3 0 0 7 1 1
550–599 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1
600–649 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
650–699 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0
Download Excel Table

Size at first maturity was estimated as 529 mm FL for males with a range of 475–588 mm and 405 mm FL for females.

Discussion

This low number of catches could result from that C. hippurus is not a target species. Local fishermen in this area go fishing for yellowfin tuna, marlin, and sharks, whereas C. hippurus is optional when the target fish are not found due to the low local market value of this species. Field observations also revealed that the occurrence of C. hippurus in this region is seasonal. Besides, although the fish are around, they did not bite at all in trolling or live bait fishing. Only a few individuals of C. hippurus are caught, usually 1–5 individuals per boat. However, there is still no study on the fishing season of C. hippurus, particularly in this area.

A previous study on dolphinfish landing in the Bitung Fisheries Port found 4,160 individuals of C. hippurus in the size range of 300–1,210 mm FL with a mean length of 598 ± 13.9 mm FL (Chodrijah & Nugroho, 2016) reflecting small size dominance. The fish samples came from catches of many kinds of fishing gears, such as purse seine, longline, and trolling. The present study found narrower size distribution, and it could result from less number of samples obtained due to high dependence on local artisanal fishermen who rely on hand-line fishing.

The present size range is far below the maximum individual size previously reported reflecting that the mean individual size of C. hippurus has been declining. The recovery rate of a population is related to the mortality rate, the closer the mean individual size to the maximum, the lower the mortality rate (ECTF, 2004). The present finding revealed that the dolphinfish population has a high mortality rate. However, so many factors influence fish population availability in the ocean. This condition is supported by Goldstein et al. (2007) that life-history traits are vulnerable to environmental stress and fishing pressure that result in smaller mature fishes as a response for survival. Fish mortality could occur at specific stages and species and the causes may be single or cumulative pressure from a range of sources, such as pollutants, anthropogenic climate change or natural variability (Olsen et al., 2019), and fishing activities. Recruitment patterns with time can influence the population size as well, and therefore, mortality events in the early life stages may have severe and long-lasting effects on the population (Langangen et al., 2017). Climate change is another factor causing changes in fish populations, which can affect the distribution of particular species and the fish susceptibility to particular fishing fleets (Rijnsdorp et al., 2009). This condition could occur because population size has probably fallen below some threshold level of abundance in which the rate of recovery cannot well respond to the fishing rate.

This sex deviation is similar to that reported in the western and central Mediterranean (Benseddik et al., 2019; Potoschi et al., 1999) reflecting sex segregation in C. hippurus until reaching the mature stage. Mature individuals seem to gather in the same area for spawning and feeding around the rafts so that more females were caught than males. This result also agrees with Perle et al. (2020) and Oxenford (1999) that sex segregation occurs in C. hippurus or males are more susceptible to fisheries than females, even though our finding found more females than males. A higher proportion of females from FADs captures could result from greater availability of females, higher natural mortality in males, or differential growth of both sexes (Benseddik et al., 2019). Moreover, males and females show different maturity stages with size class (Table 2). Both sexes show bigger individual sizes than 400 mm FL with more females at mature stages (III and IV). It indicates that males need a bigger size to reach gonad maturity or females reach gonad maturity earlier than males. These data are consistent with Beardsley (1967) that female dolphinfish begin to mature (reach stage II) at about 350 mm FL (about 6–7 months old), 50% are mature at 450 mm FL, and 100% are mature at 550 mm FL, whereas males are mature at a slightly larger size (427 mm FL). Nevertheless, in the Eastern Tunisian coast, Central Mediterranean, Benseddik et al. (2019) found that the first maturity size of C. hippurus occurs at 553 mm FL for females and 605 mm FL for males. In the present study, females above 400 mm FL reached maturity stages III and IV. This difference could result from different environmental conditions in localities. It means that 50% of mature individuals that occurs at this size, particularly in the Molucca Sea population, could be set as the minimum legal size of this species to meet the sustainability criteria and avoid economic loss due to fishing immature individuals. The size range of C. hippurus caught in the Molucca Sea reflects mature individuals and has mostly passed the size at first maturity. Nevertheless, since fishing is a major factor in reducing size and age at first maturity (McIntyre & Hutchings, 2003) and a decline in age and size at maturity may negatively affect the fish recovery (Hutchings, 2002), it needs to be controlled. The individual size decline of C. hippurus far below the maximum size could have indicated a reduced population size and should not be ignored. Earlier maturity can be associated with reduced longevity, increased post-reproductive mortality, and smaller sizes at reproductive age. Populations composed of small individuals will reduce reproductive potential (Scott et al., 1999), increase variance in offspring survival (Hutchings & Myers, 1993), and eventually negatively affect population growth.

Mesh size control and escapement could be an alternative to maintain or increase the individual size range or even increase the longevity, and the reproductive potentiality of dolphinfish. Larger fish have higher fecundity and can produce more eggs. So far, commercial purse seiners (< 30 GT) for small pelagic fish have fished any fish schools encountered in the open sea using small mesh sizes. As a result, small yellowfin tuna, skipjack, and dolphinfish are also caught (field observation). Fishing gear separation should be established for commercial small pelagic and large pelagic fisheries to maintain stock availability and prevent individual size decline. This effort limitation could help reduce the risk of population collapse and become one of the remedies to population recovery. Fish population recovery, therefore, requires institutional structures that either entice fishers to leave the business, through expensive buyout schemes of fishing boats and licenses or force them to reduce fishing activity (Hutchings & Reynolds, 2004).

The present study has contributed to providing important biological information for future management, especially dolphinfish C. hippurus of Molucca Sea. A long-term study on the biology and ecology of this species is required to well describe the population status of C. hippurus so that the management policy could be strengthened. The fisheries committee among neighborhood countries that take advantage of the resources should also participate in sustainable resource utilization programs by maintaining the exploitation level and the ecosystem equilibrium.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

References

1.

Beardsley GL. Age, growth, and reproduction of the dolphin, Coryphaena hippurus, in the straits of Florida. Copeia. 1967; 1967:441-51

2.

Benjamin D, Kurup BM. Stockasessment of dolphinfish, Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) off southwest coast of India. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 2012; 54:95-9.

3.

Benseddik AB, Besbes R, Missaoui H, Najaï SE, Jarboui O. Reproductive dynamics and fecundity of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Eastern Tunisian coast (Central Mediterranean). Curr Trends Fish Aquac. 2019.

4.

Brown P, Sivakumaran KP, Stoessel D, Giles A, Green C, Walker T. Carp population biology in Victoria. Victoria: Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute, Department of Primary Industries, Snobs Creek. 2003 Report No.: 56.

5.

Carlson AK, Rubenstein DI, Levin SA. Linking multiscalar fisheries using metacoupling models. Front Mar Sci. 2020; 7:614

6.

Chodrijah U, Nugroho D. Size structure and population parameters of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758) in the Celebes Sea. BAWAL. 2016; 8:147-58

7.

Das M, Dewan S, Debnath SC. Studies on fecundity of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch) in a mini pond of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. Bangladesh J Agric Sci. 1989; 16:1-6.

8.

Effendie MI. Fisheries biology. Bogor: Yayasan Dewi Sri. 2002; p. 163.

9.

Farley J, Davies C, Hillary R, Eveson P. Estimating size/age at of southern bluefin tuna.In Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the Scientific Committee. 2013 Canberra, Australia. .

10.

Freshwater C, Holt KR, Huanga AM, Holt CA. Benefits and limitations of increasing the stock-selectivity of Pacific salmon fisheries. Fish Res. 2020; 226:105509

11.

Galimany E, Baeta M, Durfort M, Lleonart J, Ramόn M. Reproduction and size at first maturity in a Mediterranean exploited Callista chione bivalve bed. Sci Mar. 2015; 79:233-42

12.

Goldstein J, Heppell S, Cooper A, Brault S, Lutcavage M. Reproductive status and body condition of Atlantic bluefin tuna in the Gulf of Maine, 2000–2002. Mar Biol. 2007; 151:2063-75

13.

Hutchings JA. Life histories of fish.In In: Hart P, Reynolds J, editors.editors Handbook of fish biology and fisheries. Oxford: Blackwell Science. 2002; p. 149-74

14.

Hutchings JA, Myers RA. Effect of age on the seasonality of maturation and spawning of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, in the Northwest Atlantic. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1993; 50:2468-74

15.

Hutchings JA, Reynolds JD. Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk. BioScience. 2004; 54:297-309

16.

Ilkyaz AT, Metin G, Soykan O, Kinacigil HT. Spawning season, first maturity length and age of 21 fish species from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci. 2018; 18:211-6

17.

Indian Ocean Tuna Commission [IOTC]. Review of the statistical data and fishery trends for tropical tunas.In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Working Party on Tropical Tunas. 2013 San Sebastian, Spain. .

18.

Jonsson B, Jonsson N. Early environment influences later performance in fishes. J Fish Biol. 2014; 85:151-88

19.

Karna SK, Panda S. Growth estimation and length at maturity of a commercially important fish species i.e., Dayscieaena albida (Boroga) in Chilika Lagoon, India. Eur J Exp Biol. 2011; 1:84-91.

20.

Langangen Ø, Ohlberger J, Stige LC, Durant JM, Ravagnan E, Stenseth NC, et al. Cascading effects of mass mortality events in Arctic marine communities. Glob Change Biol. 2017; 23:283-92

21.

Lin SJ, Chiang WC, Musyl MK, Wang SP, Su NJ, Chang QX, et al. Movements and habitat use of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) in the East China Sea. Sustainability. 2020; 12:5793

22.

Malone MA, Buck KM, Moreno G, Sancho G. Diet of three large pelagic fishes associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs) in the Western Equatorial Indian Ocean. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2011; 34:287-94

23.

McIntyre TM, Hutchings JA. Small-scale temporal and spatial variation in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) life history. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2003; 60:1111-21

24.

Nandikeswari R. Size at first maturity and maturity stages of Terapon jarbua (Forsskal, 1775) from Pondicherry coast, India. J Fish. 2016; 4:385-9

25.

Olsen E, Hansen C, Nilsen I, Perryman H, Vikebø F. Ecological effects and ecosystem shifts caused by mass mortality events on early life stages of fish. Front Mar Sci. 2019; 6:669

26.

Oxenford HA. Biology of the dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) in the Western Central Atlantic: a review. Sci Mar. 1999; 63:277-301

27.

Palko BJ, Beardsley GL, Richards WJ. Synopsis of the biological data on dolphin-fishes, Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus and Coryphaena equiselis Linnaeus. NOAA Tech Rep NMFS Circ. 1982; :443.

28.

Peixoto S, Calazans N, Silva EF, Nole L, Soares R, Frédou FL. Reproductive cycle and size at first sexual maturity of the white shrimp Penaeus schmitti (Burkenroad, 1936) in northeastern Brazil. Lat Am J Aquat Res. 2018; 46:1-9

29.

Perle CR, Snyder S, Merten W, Simmons M, Dacey J, Rodriguez-Sanchez R, et al. Dolphinfish movements in the Eastern Pacific Ocean of Mexico using conventional and electronic tags. Anim Biotelemetry. 2020; 8:30

30.

Potoschi A, Reñones O, Cannizzaro L. Sexual development, maturity and reproduction of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) in the Western and Central Mediterranean. Sci Mar. 1999; 63:367-72

31.

Queensland East Coast Trochus Fishery [ECTF]. General effort review: sustainability of permitted species [Internet]. 2004[cited 2021 Aug 4]https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/76629/StockAssessment-CTrawl-2004-Part9

32.

Rijnsdorp AD, Peck MA, Engelhard GH, Möllmann C, Pinnegar JK. Resolving the effect of climate change on fish populations. ICES J Mar Sci. 2009; 66:1570-83

33.

Roa R, Ernst B, Tapia F. Estimation of size at sexual maturity: an evaluation of analytical and resampling procedures. Fish Bull. 1999; 97:570-80.

34.

Schlenker LS, Faillettaz R, Stieglitz JD, Lam CH, Hoenig RH, Cox GK, et al. Remote predictions of mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus) spawning in the open ocean using summarized accelerometry data. Front Mar Sci. 2021; 8:626082

35.

Scott B, Marteinsdottir G, Wright P. Potential effects of maternal factors on spawning stock–recruitment relationships under varying fishing pressure. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1999; 56:1882-90

36.

Sturges HA. The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc. 1926; 21:65-6

37.

Taquet M, Dagorn L, Gaertner JC, Girard C, Aumerruddy R, Sancho G, et al. Behavior of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) around drifting FADs as observed from automated acoustic receivers. Aquat Living Resour. 2007; 20:323-30

38.

Tesfahun A. Overview of length-weight relationship, condition factor and size at first maturity of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in different water bodies of Ethiopia: a review. Greener J Biol Sci. 2018; 8:21-8

39.

Udupe KS. Statistical method of estimating the size at first maturity in fishes. Fishbyte. 1986; 4:8-10.

40.

Whitney NM, Taquet M, Brill RW, Girard C, Schwieterman GD, Dagorn L, et al. Swimming depth of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) associated and unassociated with fish aggregating devices. Fish Bull Natl Ocean Atmos Admin. 2016; 114:426-34