RESEARCH ARTICLE

Food and feeding habits of the large cyprinid fishes in the upper Blue Nile River, Ethiopia

Marishet Teshome1https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9540-0573, Minwyelet Mingist1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9729-7650, Elias Dadebo2, Degsera Aemro1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0073-4111
Author Information & Copyright
1Departmernt of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar 5501, Ethiopia
2Department of Biology, Hawassa University, Hawassa 5, Ethiopia
*Corresponding author: Degsera Aemro, Departmernt of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar 5501, Ethiopia, Tel: +251-058-320-6379, E-mail:adegsera@gmail.com

Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Nov 25, 2022; Revised: Feb 03, 2023; Accepted: Feb 07, 2023

Published Online: May 31, 2023

Abstract

Food and feeding habits of large cyprinid fishes (Labeobarbus intermedius, Labeobarbus nedgia, and Labeo forskalii) had been investigated in the upper Blue Nile River, Ethiopia. Four sampling sites were selected and specimens were sampled during the post-rainy (November 2016) and dry (March 2017) seasons by gillnets of 6 cm, 8 cm, 10 cm, 12 cm, and 14 cm mesh sizes. Totally 401 fishes were collected and about 30.4% (122) of the samples were documented with empty guts and 279 (69.6%) of them were with non-empty guts. The whole contents of all non-empty gut specimens were taken, labeled, and preserved using a 5% formaldehyde solution for further analysis. In the laboratory, gut contents were examined and identified using compound and stereo microscopes. The relative importance of different food items in the diet compositions was analyzed using a frequency of occurrence and volumetric analysis. During the post-rainy season, insects and phytoplankton were mostly ingested as food items. However, during the dry season, phytoplankton was the most important food item in the diet of all cyprinid fishes of the river. Based on current study results, L. intermedius and L. nedgia might be omnivores in their diet but Labeobarbus forskalii seemed to be detritivorous.

Keywords: Diet composition; Ethiopia; Feeding habits; Large cyprinid fishes; Upper Blue Nile River

Introduction

Ethiopia is endowed with numerous lakes and rivers, that are believed to have a promising capacity for fisheries resources. It has several water bodies including ponds, reservoirs, and wetlands. Wood & Talling (1988) estimated the surface area of major lakes and reservoirs to be 7,334 km2 and the length of rivers is 7,185 km. In general, there are nine main river basins (Blue Nile or Abay, Tekeze, Baro-Akobo, Omo-Ghibe, Afar/Denakil, Awash, Ogaden, Wabi-Shebelle, and Genale- Dawa) in Ethiopia and many of which are transboundary. The total mean annual flow from all those nine river basins was estimated to be 122 billion m3.

Foods are among the foremost vital exogenous factors that are essential for the property of each living organism throughout its lifetime and feeding may be a continuous method to derive energy for their future activities. The key factors that deeply influence the distribution, growth, reproduction, migration rate and behavior are mostly dependent on the provision of preferred prey organisms. The study of the food and feeding habits of fish is the subject of continuous analysis as a result it constitutes the premise for the event of a successful fisheries management program (Ikpi et al., 2012). Different studies that are done on the Blue Nile River approved that, cyprinid fishes were the dominant family over other fish families of the river (Awoke & Kefale, 2015; Beletew, 2007).

The decrement in diversity and abundance of large cyprinid fishes in this largest Ethiopian river (Labeobarbus intermedius, Labeobarbus nedgia and Labeo forskalii) have also been seen from time to time. L. nedgia is endemic to Lake Tana and its tributaries whereas, L. intermedius and L. forskalii are not endemic to Lake Tana. According to Getahun (2010) and Natugonza et al. (2023), L. nedgia and L. forskalii were under the least threatened species of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red Lists. However, as the Blue Nile River is the major river basin of Ethiopia with very important habitats of the endemic cyprinid fish fauna of the country, knowledge on the diets and feeding habits of those fish species of the river has not been systematically studied and explored. The necessity of conducting this study was to fill gaps in such biologically essential scientific information for the management and conservation of those dominant fish families of the river.

Materials and Methods

The main source of the Blue Nile River is the outflow from Lake Tana (Rzóska, 1976). The Blue Nile River flows down the eastern outskirts of Bahir Dar Town at the southern end of the Lake. The river flows down approximately 35 km in a southeast direction where it forms the famous Tiss-Isat Fall and drops into a gorge having a depth of about 45 m (Dile et al., 2013). The river flows down with deeper gorges for approximately 800 km to reach the Ethio-Sudan border, approximately 600–700 km beyond it joins with the White Nile River (Swain, 1997). Blue Nile River lies in the west of Ethiopia between 7° 45´ and 12° 45´ N, and 34° 05´and 39° 45´ E.

Four sampling sites (Sefani, Ketero, Millennium Bridge, and Bure-Abay) were selected by considering accessibility, nature and velocity of the flowing river, substrate type of the sediments, and suitability for setting gillnets, previous experience of traditional fishing and availability of fishes. The specific sampling sites were fixed by using GPS. The distances among sampling sites were 169 km from Sefani to Ketero, 109 km from Ketero to Millennium Bridge, 193 km from Millennium Bridge to Bure-Abay and 471 km from Sefani to Bure-Abay. The main features, coordinates and elevation of the sampling sites are described below (Table 1 and Fig. 1).

Table 1. Sampling sites and their GPS coordinates
Sampling sites Main features of sites Coordinate points Elevation (m)
Post-rainy season Dry season
Sefani High volume, turbid Low volume, clear 11° 27’ 46” N 1,553
Color, rocky, large Color, rocky, sandy 37° 38’ 1” E
Trees Leafless large trees
Ketero High volume, turbid Low volume, turbid 10° 39’ 49” N 1,136
Color, shrubs, infested Color, local 38° 30’ 11” E
By local crocodiles Irrigation, shrubs
Muddy
Millennium High volume, turbid Low volume, 10° 4’ 29” N 1,098
Bridge Color, sandy gravel Sandy, little 38° 11’ 24” E
Shrubs Vegetation
Bure-Abbay High volume, turbid High volume 10° 17’ 31” N 791
Color, shrubs, Turbid color, dense 37° 0’ 44” E
Crocodiles, Shrubs
Muddy
Download Excel Table
fas-26-5-344-g1
Fig. 1. Map of the study area and sampling sites.
Download Original Figure

This study has been conducted from November 2016 to March 2017 during the post-rainy and dry seasons, respectively in the upper Blue Nile River, Ethiopia. The whole gut contents of specimens of the large cyprinid fishes of the river from all selected sampling sites were collected during both seasons.

Fishing gears used for sampling fish specimens were multifilament gillnets of different stretched mesh sizes (6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 cm) with a length of 25 m and a width of 1.5 m.

Monofilament gillnets with stretched mesh sizes of 6, 8 and 10 cm were also used to sample fish in all sampling sites of the river. Monofilaments were set for about two hours in the daytime for all sampling sites from 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm. The total length and total weight of each captured specimen were measured immediately after capture using a measuring board and a balance to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 g, respectively. The all-food contents of all non-empty gut samples were taken with a bottle, information was written and preserved using a 5% formalin solution for further investigation.

Food and feeding habits

The preserved contents of each gut were transferred into a graduated plastic cylinder, volumes were measured, and data were recorded on the laboratory result datasheet. Then, the contents of each gut were transferred into the Petri dishes for microscopic identification, identification of larger food items was performed visually, whereas stereomicroscope (LEICA S4E, 10X/23, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and compound microscopes (OPTIKA E-PLAN, 10X/0.25, Optika, Ponteranica, Italy) were used to identify microscopic food categories. The relative importance of food categories was determined using the frequency of occurrence and volumetric methods of analysis. In the frequency of occurrence, the number of stomach samples containing one or more of a given food item was expressed as a percentage of all nonempty stomachs examined (Bagenal, 1978). The proportion of the large cyprinid fishes that feed on certain food items was estimated by this method. In volumetric analysis, food items were sorted into different taxonomic categories, and the water displaced by a group of items in each category was measured in a partially filled graduated cylinder (Bowen, 1983). The volume of water displaced by each category of food items was expressed as a percentage of the total volume of the stomach contents (Bowen, 1983). The diet component with the highest volume was given 16 points and every other component was awarded 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, and 0 points depending on the volume relative to the component with the highest volume (Hynes, 1950). Finally, the length and weight relationships of fishes of the upper Blue Nile River system were estimated separately by using the power function equation as in Bagenal & Tesch (1978).

Data analysis

Data were described using descriptive statistics (mean, SD and percentage). A Chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions of the different food categories during the post-rainy and dry seasons at a 95% confidence level. All needed analysis and calculations were done by using Microsoft Excel 2007.

Results

Diet composition of large cyprinid fishes

From the total number of 401 collected samples, 279 (about 70%) were found with non-empty guts; while the remaining 122 (30.4%) were with empty guts. Food and feeding habit results using the frequency of occurrence and volumetric analysis in the present study showed that, the presence of phytoplankton, insects, mud, detritus, macrophytes, macrophyte seed, sand grains, nematodes, fish scale, gastropods, zooplankton, and some unidentified food items as the dietary composition of large cyprinid fishes (Table 2 and Fig. 2).

Table 2. Frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions of different food items consumed by (A) Labeobarbus intermedius (n = 141), (B) Labeobarbus nedgia (n = 92) and (C) Labeo forskalii (n = 46) in the upper Blue Nile River
Food items Frequency of occurrence Volumetric analysis
Frequency % Volume (mL) %
(A)
Phytoplankton 140 99.3 1,130.0 61.3
Green algae 94 66.7 612.2 33.2
Blue-green algae 81 57.4 293.7 15.9
Diatoms 90 63.8 224.1 12.2
Insects 108 76.6 334.1 18.1
 Ephemeroptera 31 22.0 75.4 4.1
 Coleweoptera 20 14.2 26.0 1.4
 Plecoptera 5 3.5 8.2 0.4
 Ashinidae 1 0.7 0.5 0.04
 Anisoptera 1 0.7 2.7 0.1
 Zygoptera 4 2.8 10.9 0.6
 Diptera 13 9.2 25.0 1.4
 Hemiptera 21 14.9 28.1 1.5
 Chironomid larvae 102 72.3 135.0 7.3
 Tricoptera 10 7.1 22.2 1.2
Detritus 123 87.2 148.7 8.1
Macrophyte seed 28 19.9 83.0 4.5
Macrophytes 65 46.1 74.8 4.1
Sand grains 6 4.3 27.8 1.5
Unidentified items 17 12.1 18.5 1.0
Nematodes 18 12.8 15.4 0.8
Aquatic flatworms 18 12.8 15.4 0.8
Fish scale 10 7.1 9.2 0.5
Zooplankton 6 4.3 2.7 0.1
Protozoa 1 0.7 0.7 0.0
Cladocerans 5 3.5 2.0 0.1
(B)
Insects 84 91.3 288.35 37.4
 Ephemeroptera 47 51.1 94.01 12.2
 Coleoptera 17 18.5 20.205 2.6
 Hemiptera 33 35.9 47.27 6.1
 Chironomid larvae 68 73.9 82.39 10.7
 Diptera 16 17.4 33.445 4.3
 Odonata 2 2.2 0.435 0.1
 Plecoptera 1 1.1 0.135 0.0
 Tricoptera 5 5.4 10.46 1.4
Phytoplankton 83 90.2 267.896 34.7
Blue-green algae 63 68.5 109.47 14.2
 Green algae 41 44.6 89.561 11.6
Diatoms 41 44.6 68.865 8.9
Macrophyte seed 22 23.9 55.87 7.2
Sand grains 25 27.2 52.245 6.8
Detritus 72 78.3 48 6.2
Macrophytes 49 53.3 36.432 4.7
Nematodes 27 29.3 13.143 1.7
Aquatic flatworms 28 30.4 13.143 1.7
Gastropods 1 1.1 6.3 0.8
Cerithidea decollata 1 1.1 6.3 0.8
Fish scale 4 4.3 1.945 0.3
Unidentified items 3 3.3 0.978 0.13
Zooplankton 3 3.3 0.825 0.11
Cladocerans 2 2.2 0.39 0.1
Protozoa 1 1.1 0.435 0.1
(C)
Mud 46 100.0 217.205 57.7
Phytoplankton 39 84.8 149.94 39.8
Blue-green algae 36 78.3 130.685 34.7
Diatoms 9 19.6 15.28 4.1
Green algae 2 4.3 3.975 1.1
Nematodes 12 26.1 9.355 2.5
Aquatic flatworms 12 26.1 9.355 2.5
Zooplankton 1 2.2 0.2 0.1
Cladocerans 1 2.2 0.2 0.1
Download Excel Table
fas-26-5-344-g2
Fig. 2. Relative proportions of different food categories in the diet of (A) Labeobarbus intermedius, (B) Labeobarbus nedgia and (C) Labeo forskalii using the frequency of occurrence and volumetric analysis methods in upper Blue Nile River. PHY, phytoplankton; INS, insects; DET, detritus; MAC S, macrophyte seed; MAC, macrophytes; SDGr, sand grains; UI, unidentified items; NMT, nematodes; FS, fish scale; ZOO, zooplankton; GST, gastropods.
Download Original Figure

Specifically, L. intermedius frequently ingested phytoplankton, insects, and detritus, and these food items constituted bulk (87.5%) of the consumed foods by volume (Table 2A and Fig. 2A). The remaining food items such as macrophyte seed, macrophytes, sand grains, nematodes, fish scale and zooplankton accounted for 11.5% of the volume of the total food consumed. Phytoplankton were the most important food items occurring in 99.3% of the guts and contributing 61.3% of total volume whereas, insects and detritus had second and intermediate contributions with 18.1% and 8.1% volume of the total foods in the diet of this species in the Blue Nile River. Among the identified phytoplankton and insect groups, green algae represented by Microspora quadrata and Chironomid larvae followed by Ephemeroptera were important food items, respectively (Table 2A). However, insects were the most significant food items in the diet of L. nedgia followed by phytoplankton and macrophyte seed occurring in 91.3% of guts and accounting for 37.4% volume of total food items (Table 2B and Fig. 2B). Chironomid larvae were important food items followed by Ephemeroptera from the identified insect taxa. Whereas, blue-green algae represented by Microcysts frequently ingested by L. nedgia among the identified phytoplankton groups. The detailed contributions by other minor food items such as sand grains, detritus, macrophytes, nematodes, gastropods, fish scales, and zooplankton can be seen in Table 2B.

In the same manner, L. forskalii populations of the river mainly feed on the mud with 57.7% total volume contributions. Phytoplankton was the second important food item occurring in 84.4% of guts and contributing 39.8% volumetrically. From the identified phytoplankton groups, blue-green algae, which were represented by Microcyst were important food items (Table 2C). The contributions of nematodes and zooplankton were relatively low (Table 2C and Fig. 2C).

Results of the current study showed that phytoplankton, insects, mud, detritus, and macrophyte seed were vital food items and the presence of different prey selection behavior among the species as seen above.

Seasonal variation in the diet of large cyprinid fishes

The frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions of the different food items consumed by large cyprinid fishes varied significantly (Chi-square [X2] test, p < 0.05) with seasons (Table 3). Insects were the most important food categories during the post-rainy in the diet of L. intermedius volumetrically. However, the contribution of insects declined during the dry months by volume. Except for Chironomid larvae and Ephemeroptera, all others insect groups were not more important during the dry season (Table 3A). While phytoplankton contribution was the highest during the dry season. Only green algae represented by M.quadrata spp. was important during both seasons volumetrically from the identified phytoplankton groups in the diet of the same species. Except for some unidentified foods, the remaining food categories were more important during the dry and post-rainy seasons both in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions (Table 3A).

Table 3. Relative contributions of different food items in the diet of (A) Labeobarbus intermedius, (B) Labeobarbus nedgia and (C) Labeoforskalii during the post-rainy and dry seasons in the upper Blue Nile River
Food items Frequency of occurrence (%) Volumetric contribution (%)
Post-rainy season Dry season Post-rainy season Dry season
(A)
Insects 95.7a 65.3a 38.2b 10.7a
Ephemeroptera 50.0 14.7 10.3 1.8
Coleoptera 37.0 10.5 3.0 0.8
Plecoptera 10.9 - 1.6 -
Hemiptera 19.6 12.6 1.7 1.5
Anisoptera 2.2 - 0.5 -
Ashinidae - 1.1 - 0.04
Diptera 17.4 5.3 4.5 0.2
Zygoptera 8.7 - 2.2 -
Chironomid larvae 73.9 65.3 10.8 6.0
Tricoptera 13.0 5.3 3.6 0.3
Phytoplankton 82.6a 96.8a 37.6a 70.0b
Green algae 65.2 67.4 30.9 34.1
Blue-green algae 19.6 73.7 3.1 20.7
Diatoms 54.3 70.5 3.6 15.3
Detritus 80.4a 94.7a 8.9a 7.8a
Macrophyte seed 26.1a 16.8a 5.9a 4.0a
Macrophytes 50.0a 45.3a 6.0a 3.3a
Sand grains 10.9a 4.2a 1.6a 1.5a
Unidentified items - 18.9b - 1.4b
Nematodes 15.2a 15.8a 0.8a 0.9a
Aquatic flatworms 15.2 15.8 0.8 0.9
Zooplankton 13.0b - 0.6a -
Cladocerans 10.9 - 0.4 -
Protozoa 2.2 - 0.1 -
Fish scale 13.0a 5.3a 0.4a 0.5a
(B)
Insects 96.4a 87.7a 51.0a 31.3a
 Ephemeroptera 42.9 53.8 12.8 11.9
 Coleoptera 25.0 15.4 6.4 0.9
 Hemiptera 28.6 38.5 6.0 6.2
 Chironomid larvae 75.0 72.3 16.0 8.3
 Diptera 17.9 16.9 6.5 3.4
 Plecoptera 3.6 - 0.06 -
 Odonata - 3.1 - 0.1
 Tricoptera 10.7 4.6 3.3 0.5
Phytoplankton 78.6a 92.3a 15.6a 43.3a
Green algae 35.7 47.7 7.76 13.3
Blue-green algae 39.3 81.5 4.7 18.4
Diatoms 32.1 49.2 3.06 11.5
Macrophyte seed 21.4a 24.6a 11.1a 5.5a
Detritus 67.9a 81.5a 10.7a 4.2a
Macrophytes 42.9a 56.9a 5.1a 4.5a
Sand grains 21.4a 29.2a 3.2a 8.3a
Nematodes 35.7a 27.7a 2.1a 1.5a
Aquatic flatworms 35.7 27.7 2.1 1.5
Gastropods - 1.5a - 1.2a
Cerithidea decollata - 1.5 - 1.2
Fish scale 10.7b - 0.8a -
Zooplankton 3.6a 3.1a 0.2a 0.1a
Cladocerans - 3.1 - 0.1
Protozoa 3.6 - 0.2 -
Unidentified items 3.6a 3.1a 0.1a 0.1a
(C)
Mud 94.1a 96.6a 90.3b 37.3a
Nematodes 64.7b 6.9a 5.6a 0.6a
Aquatic flatworms 64.7 6.9 5.6 0.6
Phytoplankton 52.9a 100.0b 4.1a 62.1b
Green algae - 6.9 - 1.7
Blue-green algae 52.9 100.0 4.1 53.8
Diatoms - 72.4 - 6.6
Zooplankton - 3.4a - 0.1a
Cladocerans - 3.4 - 0.1

a,b Values of respective food categories under the same category given different superscript letters are significantly different (χ2, p < 0.05).

Download Excel Table

In the same manner, insects and phytoplankton were the essential dietary ingredients both in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions in the foods of L. nedgia through the post-rainy and dry seasons. Except for Plecoptera, all groups of insects were more important during the post-rainy months in volumetric contributions. Ephemeroptera was more important followed by Chironomid larvae during the dry season in the diet of this species volumetrically. Among the identified phytoplankton groups, the contribution of blue-green algae represented by Microcysts spp. was highest during the dry months in both frequency and volumetric contributions. Except for the frequency of occurrence contributions of the fish scale, all of the remaining food categories were important during both seasons in the diet of L. nedgia (Table 3B).

Similarly, the volumetric contribution of the mud was highest during the post-rainy season in the diet of L. forskalii species. However, mud contribution declined during the dry season. Whereas, the contributions of phytoplankton increased during the dry season both in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions. There were no contributions of green algae and diatom groups of phytoplankton during the post-rainy months in the diet of the same species. Except for Aphanizomenon spp., all the identified blue-green algae were more important during the dry months volumetrically. The contributions of the remaining food categories such as nematodes and zooplankton can be seen in Table 3C.

Results of the current study showed that, in the post-rainy season, insects, phytoplankton, as well as mud were the vital food items volumetrically and phytoplankton was the most important food categories both in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions during the dry season Table 3.

Ontogenetic dietary shifts in the diet of large cyprinid fishes

The percentages mean volume contributions of different food items in the diet of different size classes of large cyprinid fishes are presented in Fig. 3. In the smallest size class (< 20.0 cm FL) of L. intermedius, the mean volume of the diet was dominated by phytoplankton (57.3%) and detritus (20.2%) (Fig. 3A). The contribution of other food items such as macrophytes (11.7%), insects (9.8%), and sand grains (1%) was relatively low. In the size class, 20–30 cm FL of the same species, phytoplankton (45.5%), insects (13.0%), and macrophyte seed (12.7%) were important food items. In this size class, the contribution of macrophytes (10.0%), detritus (8.6%), sand grains (8.6%), unidentified food items (0.8%), nematodes (0.5%), and fish scale (0.1%) were relatively low. In the size class, 30–40 cm FL, the contributions of phytoplankton (54.9%), and insects (25.9%) were increased while the contributions of macrophyte seed (9.7%), macrophytes (5.7%), and detritus (1.7%) were relatively declined. The contributions of unidentified foods and fish scales are relatively very low. In the largest size class (> 40.0 cm FL) of L. intermedius, the contribution of phytoplankton (85.4%) was increased. The contribution of other food items such as insects, macrophytes and nematodes was relatively low (Fig. 3A).

fas-26-5-344-g3
Fig. 3. Percentage mean volumetric contributions of prey organisms consumed by (A) Labeobarbus intermedius, (B) Labeobarbus nedgia and (C) Labeo forskalii at different size classes in the upper Blue Nile River. PHY, phytoplankton; INS, insects; DET, detritus; MAC S, macrophyte seed; MAC, macrophytes; SDGr, sand grains; UI, unidentified items; NMT, nematodes; FS, fish scale; GST, gastropods.
Download Original Figure

In the same manner, the smallest size class (< 20.0 cm FL) of L. nedgia, mostly ingested phytoplankton (48.4%) and insects (39.7%) of the mean volume of the diet (Fig. 3B). The contribution of detritus (9.0%), nematodes (2.2%) and macrophytes (0.7%) were relatively low. In the size class of 20–30 cm FL of the same species, mean volume contributions of the diet were dominated by sand grains (24.0%), insects (18.3%), and phytoplankton (18 %) (Fig. 3B). The contributions of the remaining food categories such as macrophyte seed (15.3%), macrophytes (14.4%), and detritus (10%) were relatively low (Fig. 3B). In the size class, 30–40 cm FL of L. nedgia, the contribution of sand grains (32.1%) and insects (31.1%) were the significant food items (Fig. 3B). In his size class, the contributions of macrophytes (12.5%) and phytoplankton (1.7%) were declined, while, the contribution of macrophyte seed was increased. The contribution of nematodes (2.8%) was relatively very low. In the size class, > 40.0 cm FL of L. nedgia, the contribution of macrophytes (38%) and macrophyte seed was increased, while the contributions of insects (20%) and sand grains (7%) were diminished. The percent mean volume contributions of other food items such as phytoplankton and gastropods were relatively low (Fig. 3B). In the size class, < 20.0 cm FL of L. forskalii, mud contributed 93.5% of percent mean volume and nematodes was 6.5% (Fig. 3C). In the size class of 20–30 cm, FL of similar species, mud (84.1%) was decreased. In this size class, phytoplankton contributed 15.5% and there was no contribution of nematodes. In the size class of 30–40 cm of these fish species, mud (94%) increased, while phytoplankton (6%) contribution was declined.

In general, during the study period, the contributions of plant-origin foods, namely phytoplankton, macrophyte seed, macrophytes, detritus, and mud were increased with the sizes of large cyprinid fishes. Whereas, the contributions of animal-origin foods such as insects, nematodes, fish scales, zooplanktons and gastropods decreased as the size of these fishes increased (Fig. 3).

Discussion

Based on the frequency of occurrence and volumetric analysis, results of the current study clearly showed that the foods of large cyprinid fish species (L. intermedius, L. nedgia and L. forskalii) were constituted of diversified food items; phytoplankton, insects, macrophytes, mud, detritus, sand grains, macrophyte seed, nematodes, fish scale, gastropods, zooplanktons and some of the unidentified foods. This is virtually similar to reports for other fish species Heterotis niloticus and Labeo coubie from Lower Rive Benue (Solomon et al., 2017), from Lake Hawassa by Admassu & Dadebo (1997) and Lake Tana by Nagelkerke & Sibbing (1996) for Barbus species. The stomachs of cyprinid fishes comprise different types of microalgae, detritus, plant seeds, crustaceans, and the larval and adult forms of insects, which implies the trends of diversified feeding habits (Felley & Felley, 1987).

L. intermedius mainly fed on phytoplankton, insects, and detritus by appointing the bulk of the consumed foods volumetrically. The remaining food items such as macrophyte seeds, macrophytes, and others were relatively rare. The same results were reported from Lake Ahozon (South Benin) (Gbaguidi et al., 2016) for Sarotherodon galilaeus. Contrasting the present study, Engdaw et al. (2013) reported the detrital feeding habits of similar fish species from Lake Koka (Ethiopia) and gastropods were reported as a major food item of the same fish species from Lake Tana by (de Graaf et al., 2008) and from Lake Hawassa by (Desta et al., 2006). Food and feeding studies of big barbs from some other Ethiopian inland waters revealed them to be omnivorous and the fish can change its diet depending on the availability of foods, and seasonal and spatial differences (Admassu & Dadebo, 1997). The reason why L. intermedius mainly ingested phytoplankton in the current study might be due to the highest diversity of algae during the dry months and its nature of adaptive capacity to the environmental oscillations. There was no study on the specific feeding habits of the same species in riverine habitats of Africa including Ethiopia to compare the present results.

Insects were the most important food items followed by phytoplankton and macrophyte seed in the diet of L. nedgia which occur in 91.3% of guts and represented 37.4% of the total volume of the consumed prey items. Phytoplankton and macrophyte seed contributed 41.9% of the total volume. Whereas, the contributions of the remaining food items such as sand grains, detritus, macrophytes, nematodes, gastropods, fish scale, and zooplankton were relatively low. This is comparable to the results reported from Lake Tana by de Graaf et al. (2008) for the same species. The values of the remaining food items such as sand grains, gastropods, nematodes, zooplankton and fish scales were relatively low. Information is scarce on the feeding behavior of this species in riverine and lake habitats to make comparisons, except for the above-mentioned. Nevertheless, mud was a vital food item in the foods of L. forskalii with 57.7% total volume contributions. Phytoplankton was the second important food item occurring in 84.4% of guts and 39.8% volumetrically. Solomon et al. (2017) found the same results for L. coubie in the Lower River Benue. There was no comparative information on the feeding natures of L. forskalii in both African major rivers and lakes.

In the current investigation, the diet composition of large cyprinid fishes showed some seasonal variation both in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions; and slight differences among the species Table 3. The differences in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contribution of different food categories in the diet of fishes during the study period may be due to the difference in sampling period and the productivity of the rivers that create a conducive environmental condition for the seasonal reproductive cycle of the prey groups. The fact that the diet of cyprinids exhibited seasonal variations might be attributed to the changes in its location in certain periods for feeding purposes. Alike to this, Engdaw et al. (2013) reported the presence of seasonal variation in the diet of other fish species Oreochromis niloticus from Lake Koka. The current study correspondingly indicated that, in the post-rainy season, insects, phytoplankton, and mud were more important diet categories volumetrically in the diet of L. intermedius, and L. nedgia while mud contributed the highest proportions in the diet of L. forskalii in the same season. However, phytoplankton was the vital food category both in the frequency of occurrence and volumetric contributions during the dry season Table 3. This might be due to the low flow rates of the river and the high succession ability of algae during this season. A study conducted on tropical rivers showed that temperature plays a much-lessened role and the greatest densities of phytoplankton coincide with low water flow rates in riverine habitats (Talling & Rzoska, 1967). Although insects represented by Chironomid larvae and Ephemeroptera were the most important food items during the post-rainy season in the diet of L. intermedius and L. nedgia. This might be due to the deposition of organic matter that occurs in the lower regions of the stream, facilitating the establishment and availability of insects in the substrate during this season. In addition to this, the presence of dense vegetation during the post-rainy season of the study might also contribute to the abundance of insects when compared to the dry season.

The importance of mud in the diet of L. forskalii in the present study might be due to the inflow of a high number of sediments and related organisms such as crustaceans, terrestrial insect larvae, and decomposed plant remains by local runoff to the river during the post-rainy season. The important inputs into the aquatic system due to runoff include small non-aquatic insect larvae creatures and organic matter from terrestrial sources. As the floods advance, invertebrates, especially ants and termites caught by the rising flood and incorporated into the aquatic system. There was also a continuous input of insects, seeds, leaves, pollen and other material from flooded forests and grasslands, which either enters by the drift in flowing waters or settles to the bottom where it is decayed by bacterial and fungal activity (Marxsen, 1980). According to Scheffer & Carpenter (2003), mud and detritus are bottom deposits that represent two rather different kinds of food items in the river. The detritus feeders rely on coarser decomposing plant material together with associated microorganisms and animal communities. These comprise a high proportion of species, particularly in headwater streams and forested habitats, where leaf fall accumulates in the slack of the pools sor is close to floating vegetation where litter is also abundant. The resulting coarse detritus tends to be a feature of low-order streams and it becomes finer with progress downstream until in the autumn it forms fine organic mud. Bayley (1983) also described that mud contains amino acids and other organic products of decay, which can be used as fish food in combination with the saprophytic bacterial and protozoan microorganisms in the riverine habitats. The diet composition of large cyprinid fishes during the study period showed that, the omnivorous feeding habits of L. intermedius and L. nedgia populations; and the detrivores feeding natures of the L. forskalii species. Similar to the present results, omnivorous feeding habits of L. intermedius and Cyprinus carpio have been reported by Dadebo et al. (2013), and Dadebo et al. (2015), respectively from Lake Koka. Unlike the current results, Lake Tana (de Graaf et al., 2008) reported the insectivorous feeding habits of L. nedgia. Variations in feeding habits might be due to habitat differences, availability of the prey items, and the ability of prey selection by fishes in a given environment. The piscivorous feeding behaviour had not been seen during the study period. While eight piscivores Labeobarbus species have been reported from Lake Tana by Nagelkerke (1997).

In the current study, the increment of plant-origin foods contribution with the sizes of the fishes might be the implications of special adaptive mechanisms of these fishes. The presence of well-developed pharyngeal teeth used for processing food prior to digestion and long digestive tracts that increase the gut passage time to improve the efficiency of plant material digestion are the two major anatomical or physiological adaptation mechanisms of cyprinids to continue their life in changes of a given environment (Persson & Eklov, 1995). Results of this study also revealed that the ontogenetic dietary shifts were not probably evident and the only slight variation in percent mean volume contributions of different food items in the diets of different size classes is observed. Dadebo (2000) also reported similar slight variation results for Clarias gariepinus from Lake Hawassa. As most cyprinid fishes are generalists described by omnivory, detrivory or insectivory in their feeding habits, the ontogenetic diet shift may not be expected. Therefore, the absence of valid ontogenetic diet shifts during the study period might be due to the lack of fingerling feeding data and combinations of factors explained above.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding sources

The Ethiopian Ministry of Education granted us 167 USD for data collection for this research.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences of Bahir Dar University for providing the laboratory facilities and fishing gear.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study conformed to the guidance of animal ethical treatment for the care and use of experimental animals. There is no ethical approval process for fishery data in Ethiopia.

References

1.

Admassu D, Dadebo E. Diet composition, length-weight relationship and condition factor of Barbus species Rüipell, 1836 (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Awassa, Ethiopia. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 1997; 20:13-30

2.

Awoke T, Kefale A. Morphometric and meristic characteristics of dominant fishes in Blue Nile River, Ethiopia. World J Fish Mar Sci. 2015; 7:375-79.

3.

Bagenal TB. Aspects of fish fecundity.In In: Gerking SD, editor.editor Ecology of freshwater fish production. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. 1978; p p. 75-102.

4.

Bagenal TB, Tesch FW. Age and growth.In In: Bagenal TB, editor.editor Methods for assessment of fish production in freshwaters. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. 1978; p p. 101-36.

5.

Bayley PB. Central Amazon fish populations: biomass, production and some dynamic characteristics. [Ph.D. dissertation], Halifax: Dalhousie University. 1983.

6.

Beletew M. Diversity, relative abundance and biology of fishes in some rivers, and cestode parasites of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in some lakes of Ethiopia. [M.S. thesis], Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University. 2007.

7.

Bowen SH. Quantitative description of the diet.In In: Nielsen LA, Johnson DL, editors.editors Fisheries techniques. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society. 1983; p p. 325-36.

8.

Dadebo E. Reproductive biology and feeding habits of the catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) (Pisces: Clariidae) in Lake Awassa, Ethiopia. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 2000; 23:231-46

9.

Dadebo E, Eyayu A, Sorsa S, Tilahun G. Food and feeding habits of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L. 1758) (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Koka, Ethiopia. Momona Ethiop J Sci. 2015; 7:16-31

10.

Dadebo E, Tesfahun A, Teklegiorgis Y. Food and feeding habits of the African big barb Labeobarbus intermedius (Rüppell, 1836) (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Koka, Ethiopia. E3 J Agric Res Dev. 2013; 3:49-58.

11.

de Graaf M, Dejen E, Osse JWM, Sibbing FA. Adaptive radiation of Lake Tana’s (Ethiopia) Labeobarbus species flock (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Mar Freshw Res. 2008; 59:391-407

12.

Desta Z, Borgstrøm R, Rosseland BO, Gebre-Mariam Z. Major difference in mercury concentrations of the African big barb, Barbus intermedius (R.) due to shifts in trophic position. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2006; 15:532-43

13.

Dile YT, Berndtsson R, Setegn SG. Hydrological response to climate change for Gilgel Abay river, in the Lake Tana Basin: upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8e79296

14.

Engdaw F, Dadebo E, Nagappan R. Morphometric relationships and feeding habits of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) (Pisces: Cichlidae) from Lake Koka, Ethiopia. Int J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013; 2:65-71.

15.

Felley JD, Felley SM. Relationships between habitat selection by individuals of a species and patterns of habitat segregation among species: Fishes of the Calcasieu drainage.In In: Matthews WJ, Heins DC, editors.editors Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman. 1987; p p. 61-8.

16.

Gbaguidi HMAG, Adite A, Sossoukpe E. Feeding ecology and establishment of the naturally-colonized freshwater cichlid, Sarotherodon galilaeus (Pisces: Actinopterygii: Perciformes) from a man-made lake, South-Benin, West Africa. Nat Resour. 2016; 7:337-55

17.

Getahun A. Labeobarbus nedgia [Internet]. International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN]. 2010[cited 2023 Feb 3]https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/182236/7838647.

18.

Hynes HBN. The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. J Anim Ecol. 1950; 19:36-58

19.

Ikpi GU, Jenyo-Oni A, Offem BO. Catch rate, distribution, trophic and reproductive biology of the African carp Labeo coubie in the Agbokim waterfalls, Nigeria. Fish Aquac J. 2012; :2-15

20.

Marxsen JV. Investigations on the ecology of suspended bacteria in small streams. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl. 1980; 58:26-55.

21.

Nagelkerke L. The barbs of Lake Tana, Ethiopia: morphological diversity and its implications for taxonomy, trophic resource partitioning, and fisheries. [Ph.D. dissertation], Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University. 1997.

22.

Nagelkerke LAJ, Sibbing FA. Reproductive segregation among the Barbus intermedius complex of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. An example of intralacustrine speciation?. J Fish Biol. 1996; 49:1244-66

23.

Natugonza V, Musinguzi L, Getahun A, Twongo TK. Labeo forskalii [Internet]. International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN]. 2022[cited 2023 Feb 3]https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/181762/58327252.

24.

Persson L, Eklov P. Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology. 1995; 76:70-81

25.

Rzóska J. Lake Tana, headwaters of the Blue Nile.In In: Rzóska J, editor.editor The Nile, biology of an ancient river. Dordrecht: Springer. 1976; p p. 223-32

26.

Scheffer M, Carpenter SR. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation, trends in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003; 18:648-56

27.

Solomon SG, Okomoda VT, Achodo S. Biometric relationship, food and feeding habit of Heterotis niloticus (Cuvier, 1829) and Labeo coubie (Ruppell, 1832) from lower river Benue. J Aquac Eng Fish Res. 2017; 3:19-27

28.

Swain A. Ethiopia, the Sudan, and Egypt: the Nile river dispute. J Mod Afr Stud. 1997; 35:675-94

29.

Talling JF, Rzoska J. The development of plankton in relation to hydrological regime in the Blue Nile. J Ecol. 1967; 55:637-62

30.

Wood RB, Talling JF. Chemical and algal relationships in a salinity series of Ethiopian inland waters. Hydrobiologia. 1988; 158:29-67